TAP block comfort for lower abdominal surgery in pediatric patients

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cukurova Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.17826/cumj.1216281
Feyza ÖZKAN
{"title":"TAP block comfort for lower abdominal surgery in pediatric patients","authors":"Feyza ÖZKAN","doi":"10.17826/cumj.1216281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block after lower abdominal surgery on pain severity and additional analgesic requirement in a pediatric patient group.
 Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 46 ASA I children aged 2-18 years undergoing abdominal surgery were divided into two groups. Group T (n: 20) patients who were under the general anesthesia received ultrasound-guided TAP block with 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine immediately after the operation. Group O (n: 26) patients were administered intravenous (I.V.) 2 µcg/kg opioid (fentanyl) analgesia after recovery from general anesthesia. The patients were taken to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) for recovery and initial pain observation. Patients pain was assessed by using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score within the first 24 hours following surgery.
 Results: The incidence of the additional analgesic requirement in the TAP block(%15) group was statistically significantly lower than in the I.V. opioid group(%65). There was a difference between the first analgesic requirement and the discharging time according to TAP block administration, but it was statistically insignificant. The VAS scores at 4 hr and 8 hr in the TAP block group were statistically significantly lower than in the IV opioid group(4.VAS:4.90±1,21 5.90±0.85; 8.VAS:4.05±0.76 3.10±0.85). The VAS scores at postoperative 2 hr were decreased in both groups. However, the decrease in the VAS score at 2 hr was greater in the TAP block group.
 Conclusion: TAP block was superior to IV opioids in reducing additional analgesic requirements in pediatric patients undergoing abdominal surgery. It will contribute further to early discharging a patient as it allows early mobilization.","PeriodicalId":10748,"journal":{"name":"Cukurova Medical Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cukurova Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1216281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block after lower abdominal surgery on pain severity and additional analgesic requirement in a pediatric patient group. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 46 ASA I children aged 2-18 years undergoing abdominal surgery were divided into two groups. Group T (n: 20) patients who were under the general anesthesia received ultrasound-guided TAP block with 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine immediately after the operation. Group O (n: 26) patients were administered intravenous (I.V.) 2 µcg/kg opioid (fentanyl) analgesia after recovery from general anesthesia. The patients were taken to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) for recovery and initial pain observation. Patients pain was assessed by using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score within the first 24 hours following surgery. Results: The incidence of the additional analgesic requirement in the TAP block(%15) group was statistically significantly lower than in the I.V. opioid group(%65). There was a difference between the first analgesic requirement and the discharging time according to TAP block administration, but it was statistically insignificant. The VAS scores at 4 hr and 8 hr in the TAP block group were statistically significantly lower than in the IV opioid group(4.VAS:4.90±1,21 5.90±0.85; 8.VAS:4.05±0.76 3.10±0.85). The VAS scores at postoperative 2 hr were decreased in both groups. However, the decrease in the VAS score at 2 hr was greater in the TAP block group. Conclusion: TAP block was superior to IV opioids in reducing additional analgesic requirements in pediatric patients undergoing abdominal surgery. It will contribute further to early discharging a patient as it allows early mobilization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TAP阻滞对小儿下腹部手术患者的舒适度
目的:本研究旨在探讨下腹部手术后TAP阻滞对儿科患者组疼痛严重程度和额外镇痛需求的影响。 材料与方法:回顾性研究46例2-18岁ASA I级腹部手术患儿,分为两组。T组(n: 20例)全麻下患者术后立即行超声引导下TAP阻滞0.5 mL/kg 0.25%布比卡因。O组26例患者全麻恢复后静脉注射2µcg/kg阿片类药物(芬太尼)镇痛。患者被送往麻醉后护理病房(PACU)进行恢复和初步疼痛观察。术后24小时内采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估患者疼痛。 结果:TAP阻滞组的额外镇痛需求发生率(%15)显著低于静脉注射阿片类药物组(%65)。根据TAP阻滞给药,首次镇痛需求与出院时间之间存在差异,但差异无统计学意义。TAP阻断组4、8小时VAS评分均低于静脉注射阿片类药物组(4.VAS:4.90±1,21 5.90±0.85;8.血管:4.05±0.76 - 3.10±0.85)。两组术后2小时VAS评分均下降。然而,TAP阻断组在2小时时VAS评分的下降幅度更大。 结论:TAP阻滞在减少儿科腹部手术患者额外的镇痛需求方面优于静脉注射阿片类药物。它将进一步有助于病人早日出院,因为它允许早期动员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cukurova Medical Journal
Cukurova Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
159
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prematüre bebeklerde cinsiyet ve doğum şeklinin sistemik inflamatuar indeksler üzerine etkisi The prevalence of cryptosporidium spp. and other intestinal parasites in elderly patients mTOR inhibition modulates apoptosis and oxidative stress in hindlimb ischemia/reperfusion injury Mekanik ventilasyon modlarının prematüre bebeklerin tükürük kortizol düzeylerine etkisi Neonatal outcomes of patients with vaginal delivery after a Caesarean section
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1