A Study on Pre-service EFL Teachers’ Assessment of Their Own Microteaching Performance Compared with Peer and Instructor Assessments

Q1 Arts and Humanities Studies in English Language and Education Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.22275/see.28.3.03
Yoon-kyung Yim
{"title":"A Study on Pre-service EFL Teachers’ Assessment of Their Own Microteaching Performance Compared with Peer and Instructor Assessments","authors":"Yoon-kyung Yim","doi":"10.22275/see.28.3.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explored specific abilities prioritized by three assessment groups (instructors, peers, and pre-service English as a Foreign Language [EFL] teachers themselves) when assessing microteaching conducted in English. It also examined differences in assessment patterns among pre-service EFL teachers when evaluating their own and their peers’ microteaching performances. The research was conducted at a 4-year college in the southwestern region of Korea, involving three stages: instructor assessment of five pre-service EFL teachers from a different group; peer assessment of 20 pre-service EFL teachers, and collection of self-reflective journals from the same group. The collected data were subjected to both quantitative and qualitative analyses to compare and analyze the assessment criteria provided by three different assessment groups. In all three assessment groups, ‘non-verbal communication’ and ‘teaching skills and ability’ stood out as the most frequently mentioned criteria. The research findings further demonstrated that peer assessment covered a narrower range of assessment criteria compared to instructor assessment or self-assessment. The study also addresses the issues and implications associated with the implementation of peer assessment and self-assessment in pre-service EFL teacher education.","PeriodicalId":36412,"journal":{"name":"Studies in English Language and Education","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in English Language and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22275/see.28.3.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored specific abilities prioritized by three assessment groups (instructors, peers, and pre-service English as a Foreign Language [EFL] teachers themselves) when assessing microteaching conducted in English. It also examined differences in assessment patterns among pre-service EFL teachers when evaluating their own and their peers’ microteaching performances. The research was conducted at a 4-year college in the southwestern region of Korea, involving three stages: instructor assessment of five pre-service EFL teachers from a different group; peer assessment of 20 pre-service EFL teachers, and collection of self-reflective journals from the same group. The collected data were subjected to both quantitative and qualitative analyses to compare and analyze the assessment criteria provided by three different assessment groups. In all three assessment groups, ‘non-verbal communication’ and ‘teaching skills and ability’ stood out as the most frequently mentioned criteria. The research findings further demonstrated that peer assessment covered a narrower range of assessment criteria compared to instructor assessment or self-assessment. The study also addresses the issues and implications associated with the implementation of peer assessment and self-assessment in pre-service EFL teacher education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职前英语教师对自身微格教学绩效评价与同伴评价和导师评价的比较研究
本研究探讨了三个评估小组(教师、同伴和职前英语作为外语教师自己)在评估英语微教学时优先考虑的特定能力。本研究还考察了职前英语教师在评价自己和同伴的微教学表现时的评价模式的差异。本研究在韩国西南地区的一所四年制大学进行,分为三个阶段:对来自不同群体的五位职前英语教师进行教师评估;对20名职前英语教师进行同行评估,并收集同一组教师的自我反思日志。对收集到的数据进行定量和定性分析,比较和分析三个不同评估小组提供的评估标准。在所有三个评估小组中,“非语言沟通”和“教学技巧和能力”是最常被提及的标准。研究结果进一步表明,与教师评估或自我评估相比,同伴评估涵盖的评估标准范围更窄。本研究还探讨了职前英语教师教育中同伴评估和自我评估实施的相关问题和启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in English Language and Education
Studies in English Language and Education Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring the English vocabulary acquisition of Japanese learners Linguistic economy and slang as used by Jordanians on Twitter A critical content analysis of writing materials covered in Indonesian high school English textbooks Savoring Sundanese food: A discourse analysis of Instagram’s powerful promotion of Bandung’s culture and culinary The dynamic influence of interactive feedback on elevating EFL students’ writing skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1