A Survey of Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by Korean Students

Q1 Arts and Humanities Studies in English Language and Education Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.22275/see.28.3.01
Dennis Laffey
{"title":"A Survey of Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by Korean Students","authors":"Dennis Laffey","doi":"10.22275/see.28.3.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies of vocabulary learning strategies (VLS) rely on taxonomies and classifications of strategies created decades ago, but recent work suggests that this foundational work needs updating. This study presents data from an expansion of an earlier survey of university learners’ vocabulary strategy use and perceptions, this time among high school, university, and adult learner cohorts. The study provides information on strategies used often as distinct from strategies tried. The findings suggest that contemporary learners use more strategic variety than in the past. Strategies for meaning discovery are generally considered helpful. Dictionaries and technological tools for meaning discovery receive the highest marks, while social strategies are given the lowest. Strategies for vocabulary consolidation are widely used but not always viewed as helpful for vocabulary retention. Repetition and strategies for analyzing or remembering the sound and spelling are widely utilized, and strategies that actively integrate new vocabulary are seen as helpful. While differences in meaning discovery VLS use and perceptions of helpfulness for all strategies across age cohorts are small, the high school cohort reported significantly wider use of consolidation VLS than the older age cohorts. The university cohort and the adult learner cohort had more similar responses with regard to consolidation strategy use.","PeriodicalId":36412,"journal":{"name":"Studies in English Language and Education","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in English Language and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22275/see.28.3.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies of vocabulary learning strategies (VLS) rely on taxonomies and classifications of strategies created decades ago, but recent work suggests that this foundational work needs updating. This study presents data from an expansion of an earlier survey of university learners’ vocabulary strategy use and perceptions, this time among high school, university, and adult learner cohorts. The study provides information on strategies used often as distinct from strategies tried. The findings suggest that contemporary learners use more strategic variety than in the past. Strategies for meaning discovery are generally considered helpful. Dictionaries and technological tools for meaning discovery receive the highest marks, while social strategies are given the lowest. Strategies for vocabulary consolidation are widely used but not always viewed as helpful for vocabulary retention. Repetition and strategies for analyzing or remembering the sound and spelling are widely utilized, and strategies that actively integrate new vocabulary are seen as helpful. While differences in meaning discovery VLS use and perceptions of helpfulness for all strategies across age cohorts are small, the high school cohort reported significantly wider use of consolidation VLS than the older age cohorts. The university cohort and the adult learner cohort had more similar responses with regard to consolidation strategy use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国学生词汇学习策略调查
词汇学习策略(VLS)的研究依赖于几十年前创建的分类法和策略分类,但最近的研究表明,这一基础工作需要更新。本研究提供了早期对大学学习者词汇策略使用和认知的调查的扩展数据,这次是在高中、大学和成人学习者群体中进行的。这项研究提供了不同于尝试过的策略的信息。研究结果表明,当代学习者比过去使用更多的策略多样性。意义发现的策略通常被认为是有用的。词典和用于意义发现的技术工具得分最高,而社交策略得分最低。词汇巩固策略被广泛使用,但并不总是被认为对词汇记忆有帮助。重复和分析或记忆声音和拼写的策略被广泛使用,积极整合新词汇的策略被认为是有帮助的。虽然意义发现VLS的使用和对所有策略的有用性的感知在年龄队列中的差异很小,但高中队列报告的巩固VLS的使用明显比老年队列更广泛。大学组和成人学习者组在巩固策略使用方面的反应更为相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in English Language and Education
Studies in English Language and Education Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring the English vocabulary acquisition of Japanese learners Linguistic economy and slang as used by Jordanians on Twitter A critical content analysis of writing materials covered in Indonesian high school English textbooks Savoring Sundanese food: A discourse analysis of Instagram’s powerful promotion of Bandung’s culture and culinary The dynamic influence of interactive feedback on elevating EFL students’ writing skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1