Computer model and code sharing practices in healthcare discrete-event simulation: a systematic scoping review

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Simulation Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.1080/17477778.2023.2260772
Thomas Monks, Alison Harper
{"title":"Computer model and code sharing practices in healthcare discrete-event simulation: a systematic scoping review","authors":"Thomas Monks, Alison Harper","doi":"10.1080/17477778.2023.2260772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discrete-event simulation (DES) is a widely used computational method in health services and health economic studies. This scoping review investigates to what extent authors share DES models and audits if sharing adheres to best practice. The Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and ACM Digital Library databases were searched between January 1 2019 till December 31 2022. Cost-effectiveness, health service research and methodology studies in a health context were included. Data extraction and audit were performed by two reviewers. We measured the proportion of literature that shared models; we report analyses by publication type, year of publication, COVID-19 application; and free and open source versus commercial software. Out of the 564 studies included, 47 (8.3%) cited a published computer model, rising to 9.0% in 2022. Studies were more likely to share models if they had been developed using free and open source tools. Studies rarely followed best practice when sharing computer models. Although still in the minority, healthcare DES authors are increasingly sharing their computer model artefacts. Although commercial software dominates the DES literature, free and open source software plays a crucial role in sharing. The DES community can adopt simple best practices to improve the quality of sharing.","PeriodicalId":51296,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Simulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2023.2260772","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Discrete-event simulation (DES) is a widely used computational method in health services and health economic studies. This scoping review investigates to what extent authors share DES models and audits if sharing adheres to best practice. The Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and ACM Digital Library databases were searched between January 1 2019 till December 31 2022. Cost-effectiveness, health service research and methodology studies in a health context were included. Data extraction and audit were performed by two reviewers. We measured the proportion of literature that shared models; we report analyses by publication type, year of publication, COVID-19 application; and free and open source versus commercial software. Out of the 564 studies included, 47 (8.3%) cited a published computer model, rising to 9.0% in 2022. Studies were more likely to share models if they had been developed using free and open source tools. Studies rarely followed best practice when sharing computer models. Although still in the minority, healthcare DES authors are increasingly sharing their computer model artefacts. Although commercial software dominates the DES literature, free and open source software plays a crucial role in sharing. The DES community can adopt simple best practices to improve the quality of sharing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗离散事件模拟中的计算机模型和代码共享实践:系统范围审查
离散事件模拟(DES)是一种广泛应用于卫生服务和卫生经济研究的计算方法。这个范围审查调查了作者在多大程度上共享DES模型,并审计共享是否符合最佳实践。在2019年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间检索了Web of Science、Scopus、PubMed和ACM数字图书馆数据库。其中包括保健方面的成本效益、保健服务研究和方法研究。数据提取和审核由两名审稿人完成。我们测量了共享模型的文献的比例;我们按出版类型、出版年份、COVID-19应用报告分析;免费和开源软件与商业软件的对比。在纳入的564项研究中,47项(8.3%)引用了已发表的计算机模型,到2022年这一比例将上升至9.0%。如果研究是使用免费和开源工具开发的,那么它们更有可能共享模型。在共享计算机模型时,研究很少遵循最佳实践。尽管仍占少数,但医疗保健DES的作者正在越来越多地分享他们的计算机模型人工制品。尽管商业软件在DES文献中占主导地位,但免费和开源软件在共享中起着至关重要的作用。DES社区可以采用简单的最佳实践来提高共享的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Simulation
Journal of Simulation COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Journal of Simulation (JOS) aims to publish both articles and technical notes from researchers and practitioners active in the field of simulation. In JOS, the field of simulation includes the techniques, tools, methods and technologies of the application and the use of discrete-event simulation, agent-based modelling and system dynamics.
期刊最新文献
Live fitting of process data within digital twins of manufacturing to use simulation and optimisation Mitigating housing market shocks: an agent-based reinforcement learning approach with implications for real-time decision support Hybrid simulation in healthcare: a systematic exploration of models, applications, and emerging trends Increasing the performance of a hospital department with budget allocation model and machine learning assisted by simulation Towards sharing tools and artefacts for reusable simulations in healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1