Influence of geomagnetic disturbances on scintillations of GLONASS and GPS signals as observed on the Kola Peninsula

Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.12737/stp-93202307
Vladimir Belahovskiy, Pavel Budnikov, Alexey Kalishin, Sergey Pilgaev, Alexey Roldugin
{"title":"Influence of geomagnetic disturbances on scintillations of GLONASS and GPS signals as observed on the Kola Peninsula","authors":"Vladimir Belahovskiy, Pavel Budnikov, Alexey Kalishin, Sergey Pilgaev, Alexey Roldugin","doi":"10.12737/stp-93202307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have compared effects of geomagnetic disturbances during magnetic storms of various types (CME and CIR) and during an isolated substorm on scintillations of GLONASS and GPS signals, using a Septentrio PolaRx5 receiver installed in Apatity (Murmansk Region, Russia). We analyze observational data for 2021. The magnetic storms of November 3–4, 2021 and October 11–12, 2021 are examined in detail. The November 3–4, 2021 magnetic storm was one of the most powerful in recent years. The analysis shows that the scintillation phase index reaches its highest values during nighttime and evening substorms (σϕ≈1.5–1.8), accompanied by a negative bay in the magnetic field. During magnetic storms, positive bays in the magnetic field, associated with an increase in the eastward electrojet, lead, however, to quite comparable values of the phase scintillation index.
 An increase in phase scintillations during nighttime and evening disturbances correlates with an increase in the intensity of ULF waves (Pi3/Pc5 pulsations) and with the appearance of aurora arcs. This confirms the important role of ULF waves in forming the auroral arc and in developing ionospheric irregularities. The predominance of the green line in the spectrum of auroras indicates the contribution of disturbances in the ionospheric E layer to the scintillation increase. Pulsating auroras, associated with ionospheric disturbances in the D layer, do not lead to a noticeable increase in phase scintillations. Analysis of ionospheric critical frequencies according to ionosonde data from the Lovozero Hydrometeorological Station indicates the contribution of the sporadic Es layer of the ionosphere to jumps in phase scintillations.
 The difference between phase scintillation values on GLONASS and GPS satellites during individual disturbances can be as great as 1.5 times, which may be due to different orbits of the satellites. At the same time, the level of GLONASS/GPS scintillations at the L2 frequency is higher than at the L1 frequency. We did not find an increase in the amplitude index of scintillations during the events considered.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-93202307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have compared effects of geomagnetic disturbances during magnetic storms of various types (CME and CIR) and during an isolated substorm on scintillations of GLONASS and GPS signals, using a Septentrio PolaRx5 receiver installed in Apatity (Murmansk Region, Russia). We analyze observational data for 2021. The magnetic storms of November 3–4, 2021 and October 11–12, 2021 are examined in detail. The November 3–4, 2021 magnetic storm was one of the most powerful in recent years. The analysis shows that the scintillation phase index reaches its highest values during nighttime and evening substorms (σϕ≈1.5–1.8), accompanied by a negative bay in the magnetic field. During magnetic storms, positive bays in the magnetic field, associated with an increase in the eastward electrojet, lead, however, to quite comparable values of the phase scintillation index. An increase in phase scintillations during nighttime and evening disturbances correlates with an increase in the intensity of ULF waves (Pi3/Pc5 pulsations) and with the appearance of aurora arcs. This confirms the important role of ULF waves in forming the auroral arc and in developing ionospheric irregularities. The predominance of the green line in the spectrum of auroras indicates the contribution of disturbances in the ionospheric E layer to the scintillation increase. Pulsating auroras, associated with ionospheric disturbances in the D layer, do not lead to a noticeable increase in phase scintillations. Analysis of ionospheric critical frequencies according to ionosonde data from the Lovozero Hydrometeorological Station indicates the contribution of the sporadic Es layer of the ionosphere to jumps in phase scintillations. The difference between phase scintillation values on GLONASS and GPS satellites during individual disturbances can be as great as 1.5 times, which may be due to different orbits of the satellites. At the same time, the level of GLONASS/GPS scintillations at the L2 frequency is higher than at the L1 frequency. We did not find an increase in the amplitude index of scintillations during the events considered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
地磁扰动对在科拉半岛观测到的GLONASS和GPS信号闪烁的影响
我们使用安装在Apatity(俄罗斯摩尔曼斯克地区)的Septentrio PolaRx5接收机,比较了不同类型磁暴(CME和CIR)和孤立亚暴期间地磁扰动对GLONASS和GPS信号闪烁的影响。我们分析2021年的观测数据。对2021年11月3日至4日和2021年10月11日至12日的磁暴进行了详细研究。2021年11月3日至4日的磁暴是近年来最强的磁暴之一。分析表明,闪烁相位指数在夜间和傍晚亚暴期间达到最大值(σ φ≈1.5 ~ 1.8),并伴有磁场负凹。然而,在磁暴期间,与东向电喷流增加有关的磁场正凹导致了相闪烁指数的相当大的值。在夜间和夜间扰动期间,相位闪烁的增加与极低频波(Pi3/Pc5脉动)强度的增加和极光弧的出现有关。这证实了极低频波在形成极光弧和发展电离层不规则性中的重要作用。极光光谱中绿线的优势表明电离层E层的扰动对闪烁增加的贡献。脉动极光与D层的电离层扰动有关,不会导致相位闪烁的显著增加。根据Lovozero水文气象站的电离层探测资料对电离层临界频率的分析表明,电离层的零星Es层对相位闪烁跳变的贡献。 GLONASS和GPS卫星在单个扰动时的相位闪烁值相差可达1.5倍,这可能是由于卫星轨道不同造成的。同时,GLONASS/GPS在L2频率下的闪烁电平高于L1频率。在考虑的事件中,我们没有发现闪烁的振幅指数增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1