Beyond emergency remote teaching: did the pandemic lead to lasting change in university courses?

IF 8.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1186/s41239-023-00428-z
J. Broadbent, R. Ajjawi, M. Bearman, D. Boud, P. Dawson
{"title":"Beyond emergency remote teaching: did the pandemic lead to lasting change in university courses?","authors":"J. Broadbent, R. Ajjawi, M. Bearman, D. Boud, P. Dawson","doi":"10.1186/s41239-023-00428-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted traditional methods of teaching and learning within higher education. But what remained when the pandemic passed? While the majority of the literature explores the shifts during the pandemic, with much speculation about post-pandemic futures, a clear understanding of lasting implications remains elusive. To illuminate this knowledge gap, our study contrasts pedagogical practices in matched courses from the pre-pandemic year (2019) to the post-pandemic phase (2022/2023). We also investigate the factors influencing these changes and the perceptions of academics on these shifts. Data were gathered from academics in a large comprehensive Australian university of varying disciplines through a mixed-methods approach, collecting 67 survey responses and conducting 21 interviews. Findings indicate a notable increase in online learning activities, authentic and scaffolded assessments, and online unsupervised exams post-pandemic. These changes were primarily driven by university-guided adaptations, time and workload pressures, continued COVID-19 challenges, local leadership, an individual desire to innovate, and concerns about academic integrity. While most changes were seen as favourable by academics, perceptions were less positive concerning online examinations. These findings illuminate the enduring effects of the pandemic on higher education, suggesting longer-term implications than previous studies conducted during the acute phase of the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":13871,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education","volume":"46 13","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00428-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted traditional methods of teaching and learning within higher education. But what remained when the pandemic passed? While the majority of the literature explores the shifts during the pandemic, with much speculation about post-pandemic futures, a clear understanding of lasting implications remains elusive. To illuminate this knowledge gap, our study contrasts pedagogical practices in matched courses from the pre-pandemic year (2019) to the post-pandemic phase (2022/2023). We also investigate the factors influencing these changes and the perceptions of academics on these shifts. Data were gathered from academics in a large comprehensive Australian university of varying disciplines through a mixed-methods approach, collecting 67 survey responses and conducting 21 interviews. Findings indicate a notable increase in online learning activities, authentic and scaffolded assessments, and online unsupervised exams post-pandemic. These changes were primarily driven by university-guided adaptations, time and workload pressures, continued COVID-19 challenges, local leadership, an individual desire to innovate, and concerns about academic integrity. While most changes were seen as favourable by academics, perceptions were less positive concerning online examinations. These findings illuminate the enduring effects of the pandemic on higher education, suggesting longer-term implications than previous studies conducted during the acute phase of the pandemic.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
除了紧急远程教学:大流行是否导致了大学课程的持久变化?
新冠肺炎疫情严重破坏了传统的高等教育教学方式。但大流行过去后还剩下什么呢?虽然大多数文献探讨了大流行期间的变化,并对大流行后的未来进行了许多猜测,但对持久影响的清晰理解仍然难以捉摸。为了阐明这一知识差距,我们的研究对比了从大流行前一年(2019年)到大流行后阶段(2022/2023年)的匹配课程的教学实践。我们还调查了影响这些变化的因素以及学术界对这些变化的看法。数据通过混合方法从澳大利亚一所大型综合性大学的不同学科的学者中收集,收集了67份调查回复,进行了21次访谈。调查结果表明,大流行后,在线学习活动、真实和框架评估以及在线无监督考试显著增加。这些变化主要是由大学引导的适应、时间和工作量压力、持续的COVID-19挑战、地方领导、个人创新的愿望以及对学术诚信的关注所驱动的。虽然学术界认为大多数变化是有利的,但对在线考试的看法却不那么积极。这些发现阐明了大流行对高等教育的持久影响,表明了比以往在大流行急性阶段进行的研究更长期的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
59
审稿时长
76.7 days
期刊介绍: This journal seeks to foster the sharing of critical scholarly works and information exchange across diverse cultural perspectives in the fields of technology-enhanced and digital learning in higher education. It aims to advance scientific knowledge on the human and personal aspects of technology use in higher education, while keeping readers informed about the latest developments in applying digital technologies to learning, training, research, and management.
期刊最新文献
Students' digital technology attitude, literacy and self-efficacy and their effect on online learning engagement Face-to-face vs. blended learning in higher education: a quantitative analysis of biological science student outcomes Students’ perceptions of using ChatGPT in a physics class as a virtual tutor Integrating chatbots in education: insights from the Chatbot-Human Interaction Satisfaction Model (CHISM) Flipped classroom in higher education: a systematic literature review and research challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1