Proportionality Principle in the CJEU Judgments on Tax Cases

Q2 Social Sciences Lex Portus Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.26886/2524-101x.9.4.2023.3
Simeana Beshi, Driola Susuri
{"title":"Proportionality Principle in the CJEU Judgments on Tax Cases","authors":"Simeana Beshi, Driola Susuri","doi":"10.26886/2524-101x.9.4.2023.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a comprehensive jurisprudential analysis of the principle of proportionality in EU law in the context of avoiding, abusing, and preventing tax evasion, as highlighted by the CJEU’s jurisprudential practices. This study aims to clarify how the principle relates to the multifaceted challenges tax evasion poses for the EU. Key findings from this research underscore the pivotal role played by the principle in ensuring that EU tax laws effectively combat tax evasion while safeguarding fundamental rights and principles of justice. The CJEU’s jurisprudential practices provide valuable insights into the interpretation and application of this principle in concrete cases, offering guidance to Member States and practitioners in the field. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse surrounding tax evasion and its countermeasures within the EU. As the EU continues to evolve its tax policies in an increasingly globalized and interconnected world, understanding the nuances of the principle of proportionality becomes indispensable. This research is a valuable resource for policymakers, legal practitioners, scholars, and stakeholders interested in enhancing the coherence and effectiveness of EU tax law while upholding the rule of law and protecting the integrity of the internal market.","PeriodicalId":36374,"journal":{"name":"Lex Portus","volume":"44 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Portus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101x.9.4.2023.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive jurisprudential analysis of the principle of proportionality in EU law in the context of avoiding, abusing, and preventing tax evasion, as highlighted by the CJEU’s jurisprudential practices. This study aims to clarify how the principle relates to the multifaceted challenges tax evasion poses for the EU. Key findings from this research underscore the pivotal role played by the principle in ensuring that EU tax laws effectively combat tax evasion while safeguarding fundamental rights and principles of justice. The CJEU’s jurisprudential practices provide valuable insights into the interpretation and application of this principle in concrete cases, offering guidance to Member States and practitioners in the field. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse surrounding tax evasion and its countermeasures within the EU. As the EU continues to evolve its tax policies in an increasingly globalized and interconnected world, understanding the nuances of the principle of proportionality becomes indispensable. This research is a valuable resource for policymakers, legal practitioners, scholars, and stakeholders interested in enhancing the coherence and effectiveness of EU tax law while upholding the rule of law and protecting the integrity of the internal market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等法院税务判决中的比例原则
本文对欧盟法律中的比例原则在避免、滥用和防止逃税的背景下进行了全面的法理分析,并以欧洲法院的法理实践为重点。本研究旨在阐明该原则与逃税对欧盟构成的多方面挑战之间的关系。本研究的主要发现强调了该原则在确保欧盟税法有效打击逃税,同时维护基本权利和正义原则方面发挥的关键作用。欧洲法院的司法实践为在具体案件中解释和适用这一原则提供了宝贵的见解,为会员国和该领域的从业人员提供了指导。本研究有助于围绕欧盟内部逃税及其对策的持续讨论。随着欧盟在日益全球化和相互联系的世界中继续发展其税收政策,了解比例原则的细微差别变得必不可少。对于政策制定者、法律从业者、学者和利益相关者来说,这项研究是一个宝贵的资源,他们有兴趣提高欧盟税法的一致性和有效性,同时维护法治和保护内部市场的完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lex Portus
Lex Portus Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Parallel Imports: Striking a Delicate Balance in a Multifaceted Environment Potential Influence of Article 6(1)(b) of the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts on Indian Private International Law Ukrainian Supreme Court Judicial Practice in Cases Arising from Disputes between Foreign Shipowners or Protection and Indemnity Clubs, and Seafarers or Seafarers’ Next of Kin India’s Submission to the ITLOS Climate Change Advisory Opinion: A Lost Opportunity Ukraine – China Asymmetric Economic Power Relations: What is to Come after BRI?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1