Fast Maximal Quasi-clique Enumeration: A Pruning and Branching Co-Design Approach

Kaiqiang Yu, Cheng Long
{"title":"Fast Maximal Quasi-clique Enumeration: A Pruning and Branching Co-Design Approach","authors":"Kaiqiang Yu, Cheng Long","doi":"10.1145/3617331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mining cohesive subgraphs from a graph is a fundamental problem in graph data analysis. One notable cohesive structure is γ-quasi-clique (QC), where each vertex connects at least a fraction γ of the other vertices inside. Enumerating maximal γ-quasi-cliques (MQCs) of a graph has been widely studied and used for many applications such as community detection and significant biomolecule structure discovery. One common practice of finding all MQCs is to (1) find a set of QCs containing all MQCs and then (2) filter out non-maximal QCs. While quite a few algorithms have been developed (which are branch-and-bound algorithms) for finding a set of QCs that contains all MQCs, all focus on sharpening the pruning techniques and devote little effort to improving the branching part. As a result, they provide no guarantee on pruning branches and all have the worst-case time complexity of O*(2n), where O* suppresses the polynomials and n is the number of vertices in the graph. In this paper, we focus on the problem of finding a set of QCs containing all MQCs but deviate from further sharpening the pruning techniques as existing methods do. We pay attention to both the pruning and branching parts and develop new pruning techniques and branching methods that would suit each other better towards pruning more branches both theoretically and practically. Specifically, we develop a new branch-and-bound algorithm called FastQC based on newly developed pruning techniques and branching methods, which improves the worst-case time complexity to O*(αkn), where αk is a positive real number strictly smaller than 2. Furthermore, we develop a divide-and-conquer strategy for boosting the performance of FastQC. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments on both real and synthetic datasets, and the results show that our algorithms are up to two orders of magnitude faster than the state-of-the-art on real datasets.","PeriodicalId":498157,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data","volume":"34 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3617331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mining cohesive subgraphs from a graph is a fundamental problem in graph data analysis. One notable cohesive structure is γ-quasi-clique (QC), where each vertex connects at least a fraction γ of the other vertices inside. Enumerating maximal γ-quasi-cliques (MQCs) of a graph has been widely studied and used for many applications such as community detection and significant biomolecule structure discovery. One common practice of finding all MQCs is to (1) find a set of QCs containing all MQCs and then (2) filter out non-maximal QCs. While quite a few algorithms have been developed (which are branch-and-bound algorithms) for finding a set of QCs that contains all MQCs, all focus on sharpening the pruning techniques and devote little effort to improving the branching part. As a result, they provide no guarantee on pruning branches and all have the worst-case time complexity of O*(2n), where O* suppresses the polynomials and n is the number of vertices in the graph. In this paper, we focus on the problem of finding a set of QCs containing all MQCs but deviate from further sharpening the pruning techniques as existing methods do. We pay attention to both the pruning and branching parts and develop new pruning techniques and branching methods that would suit each other better towards pruning more branches both theoretically and practically. Specifically, we develop a new branch-and-bound algorithm called FastQC based on newly developed pruning techniques and branching methods, which improves the worst-case time complexity to O*(αkn), where αk is a positive real number strictly smaller than 2. Furthermore, we develop a divide-and-conquer strategy for boosting the performance of FastQC. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments on both real and synthetic datasets, and the results show that our algorithms are up to two orders of magnitude faster than the state-of-the-art on real datasets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速最大拟团枚举:一种剪枝和分支协同设计方法
从图中挖掘内聚子图是图数据分析中的一个基本问题。一个值得注意的内聚结构是γ-准团(QC),其中每个顶点至少连接内部其他顶点的一小部分γ。图的极大γ-拟团(MQCs)的枚举已被广泛研究并应用于群落检测和重大生物分子结构发现等领域。查找所有mqc的一种常见做法是:(1)查找一组包含所有mqc的qc,然后(2)过滤掉非最大的qc。虽然已经开发了相当多的算法(分支和定界算法)来查找包含所有mqc的一组qc,但所有算法都侧重于改进修剪技术,而很少致力于改进分支部分。因此,它们不能保证修剪分支,并且都具有O*(2n)的最坏情况时间复杂度,其中O*抑制多项式,n是图中的顶点数。在本文中,我们关注的问题是找到一组包含所有mqc的qc,但不像现有方法那样进一步加强修剪技术。我们同时关注剪枝和分支两个方面,不断开发新的剪枝技术和分支方法,使它们在理论和实践上都能更好地相互适应,从而修剪出更多的分支。具体而言,我们基于新开发的剪枝技术和分支方法开发了一种新的分支定界算法FastQC,将最坏情况时间复杂度提高到O*(αkn),其中αk是严格小于2的正实数。此外,我们还开发了一种分而治之的策略来提高FastQC的性能。最后,我们在真实数据集和合成数据集上进行了广泛的实验,结果表明我们的算法比真实数据集上的最先进算法快两个数量级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Verification of Unary Communicating Datalog Programs Postulates for Provenance: Instance-based provenance for first-order logic Tight Lower Bounds for Directed Cut Sparsification and Distributed Min-Cut Containment of Graph Queries Modulo Schema Bag Semantics Conjunctive Query Containment. Four Small Steps Towards Undecidability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1