Effects of fertilizer produced from agro-industrial wastes on the quality of two different soils

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.1080/03650340.2023.2266218
Federica Marra, Angela Maffia, Francesco Canino, Carmelo Greco, Carmelo Mallamaci, Muscolo Adele
{"title":"Effects of fertilizer produced from agro-industrial wastes on the quality of two different soils","authors":"Federica Marra, Angela Maffia, Francesco Canino, Carmelo Greco, Carmelo Mallamaci, Muscolo Adele","doi":"10.1080/03650340.2023.2266218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTA newly developed sustainable fertilizer, known as SB, was created by blending organic and mineral components using agro-industrial waste, sulphur, and orange residue, bound together with bentonite. It was extensively tested on two distinct soils with different chemical and biological properties, comparing its effectiveness to traditional chemical (NPK) and organic (horse manure, HM) fertilizers, with unfertilized soil as a control (CTR). The introduction of SB did not alter soil texture but significantly impacted soil chemistry and biology. It positively influenced the labile fraction of soil organic matter, resulting in a 15% increase in soil microbial biomass, total phenolic content, cations, bacterial colonies, and enzyme activities, with varying effects depending on soil characteristics. SB demonstrated a beneficial effect on both soil types, with optimal concentrations determined to be 2.8 for Motta and 4.2 for Lazzaro, highlighting the importance of soil characteristics in fertilizer effectiveness. In conclusion, SB represents a promising innovation for transitioning from traditional agriculture to a more sustainable and circular approach, offering economic and environmental benefits by reducing waste disposal costs and decreasing reliance on mineral fertilizers in line with circular economy principles. This study emphasizes the need to consider soil properties when optimizing fertilizer use.KEYWORDS: Fertilizer productionsoil enzyme activitiessoil qualitysoil fertilitysulphur-based fertilizer Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Author contributionsAll authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. Muscolo Adele designed the project, wrote the manuscript, review & editing it. Federica Marra worked in the laboratory, carrying on soil chemical analyses. Francesco Canino and Beatrix Petrovicova worked in the laboratory carrying on the biochemical soil analysis. Mallamaci Carmelo, Greco Carmelo carried on the field experiments.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by LIFE Programme of the European Commission, under grant LIFE20 ENV/IT/000229 –LIFE RecOrgFert PLUS.","PeriodicalId":8154,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2023.2266218","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTA newly developed sustainable fertilizer, known as SB, was created by blending organic and mineral components using agro-industrial waste, sulphur, and orange residue, bound together with bentonite. It was extensively tested on two distinct soils with different chemical and biological properties, comparing its effectiveness to traditional chemical (NPK) and organic (horse manure, HM) fertilizers, with unfertilized soil as a control (CTR). The introduction of SB did not alter soil texture but significantly impacted soil chemistry and biology. It positively influenced the labile fraction of soil organic matter, resulting in a 15% increase in soil microbial biomass, total phenolic content, cations, bacterial colonies, and enzyme activities, with varying effects depending on soil characteristics. SB demonstrated a beneficial effect on both soil types, with optimal concentrations determined to be 2.8 for Motta and 4.2 for Lazzaro, highlighting the importance of soil characteristics in fertilizer effectiveness. In conclusion, SB represents a promising innovation for transitioning from traditional agriculture to a more sustainable and circular approach, offering economic and environmental benefits by reducing waste disposal costs and decreasing reliance on mineral fertilizers in line with circular economy principles. This study emphasizes the need to consider soil properties when optimizing fertilizer use.KEYWORDS: Fertilizer productionsoil enzyme activitiessoil qualitysoil fertilitysulphur-based fertilizer Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Author contributionsAll authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. Muscolo Adele designed the project, wrote the manuscript, review & editing it. Federica Marra worked in the laboratory, carrying on soil chemical analyses. Francesco Canino and Beatrix Petrovicova worked in the laboratory carrying on the biochemical soil analysis. Mallamaci Carmelo, Greco Carmelo carried on the field experiments.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by LIFE Programme of the European Commission, under grant LIFE20 ENV/IT/000229 –LIFE RecOrgFert PLUS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农业工业废弃物生产的肥料对两种不同土壤质量的影响
新开发的可持续肥料SB是将农业工业废料、硫和橙渣与膨润土结合在一起,将有机和矿物成分混合而成的。在两种具有不同化学和生物特性的土壤上进行了广泛的试验,比较了其与传统化学(NPK)和有机(马粪,HM)肥料的效果,并以未施肥的土壤为对照(CTR)。引种SB对土壤质地无显著影响,但对土壤化学和生物特性有显著影响。它对土壤有机质的不稳定组分产生积极影响,导致土壤微生物生物量、总酚含量、阳离子、细菌菌落和酶活性增加15%,其效果因土壤特征而异。SB对两种土壤类型都有良好的效果,Motta的最佳浓度为2.8,Lazzaro的最佳浓度为4.2,这突出了土壤特征对肥料有效性的重要性。综上所述,SB代表了从传统农业向更可持续和循环的方式过渡的一种有前景的创新,通过降低废物处理成本和减少对矿物肥料的依赖,符合循环经济原则,提供经济和环境效益。本研究强调在优化肥料使用时需要考虑土壤性质。关键词:肥料生产土壤酶活性土壤质量土壤肥力含硫肥料披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。所有作者讨论了结果并对稿件进行了评论。Muscolo Adele设计了这个项目,撰写了手稿,并对其进行了审查和编辑。费代丽卡·马拉在实验室工作,进行土壤化学分析。Francesco Canino和Beatrix Petrovicova在实验室进行土壤生化分析。Mallamaci Carmelo, Greco Carmelo进行了实地实验。本研究由欧盟委员会生命项目资助,项目编号为LIFE20 ENV/IT/000229 -LIFE RecOrgFert PLUS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: rchives of Agronomy and Soil Science is a well-established journal that has been in publication for over fifty years. The Journal publishes papers over the entire range of agronomy and soil science. Manuscripts involved in developing and testing hypotheses to understand casual relationships in the following areas: plant nutrition fertilizers manure soil tillage soil biotechnology and ecophysiology amelioration irrigation and drainage plant production on arable and grass land agroclimatology landscape formation and environmental management in rural regions management of natural and created wetland ecosystems bio-geochemical processes soil-plant-microbe interactions and rhizosphere processes soil morphology, classification, monitoring, heterogeneity and scales reuse of waste waters and biosolids of agri-industrial origin in soil are especially encouraged. As well as original contributions, the Journal also publishes current reviews.
期刊最新文献
Dust-induced metal toxicity alleviated by the combined effect of organic and inorganic amendments on soil and plant Determinants of minimal soil disturbance adoption over time and in the face of climate vulnerability Soil chemical characteristics, yield and technological quality of sugarcane under subsurface drip irrigation with treated sewage effluent Coated controlled-release urea improves soil NO3−−N accumulation, rubber yield and economic profit in a Hevea brasiliensis plantation Effects of the training system on water productivity and water footprint in Mediterranean vineyards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1