Public participation as a key principle of the openness of the judiciary: genesis and globalization aspects

Andriy Mazovita
{"title":"Public participation as a key principle of the openness of the judiciary: genesis and globalization aspects","authors":"Andriy Mazovita","doi":"10.23939/law2023.38.262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Annotation. The article analyzes the historical-legal and recent globalization trends in the development of the principle of public participation as a factor of judicial openness. It was established that open governance guarantees transparency, accountability and openness of government, while simultaneously increasing opportunities for citizen participation. It has been proven that it is in demand in the exercise of judicial power. The genesis aspects of the formation of the judiciary were characterized by the fact that the parties to the process depended on the favor of the rulers for the right to participate in the courts: not all individuals were authorized to file lawsuits, testify, serve as a professional or public assessor, even the right to be a plaintiff. The author singled out historical aspects of the development of the openness of the judiciary: overcoming the selectivity of the participation of individuals in the process; development of the accessibility of the judicial process for all without discrimination on various grounds; spreading the openness of judicial information as a means of achieving the legal educational function of the government and a way of preventing crime; the direct connection between the development of the principle of openness and the development of political human rights. The existence of two concepts of the understanding of open justice is motivated: a quick and public trial, based on the norms of law, which are highlighted in the Bill of Rights of the United States of 1791, and the fairness and accessibility of the court, which is highlighted in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950. The global trends of changes in public participation in the judiciary under the influence of the development of the information environment are indicated. The latter provides wider opportunities for access to the court. The openness of the court is not only the main demand of people for judicial work, but also a channel for demonstrating judicial justice. The following problems of the modern stage of legal support of the principle of court openness have been identified: the complexity of guaranteeing (a combination of legal and technical mechanisms) the information availability of the judiciary; providing the latest opportunities for judicial information analysis by overcoming the classic selective approach by using the data systematization method.","PeriodicalId":490087,"journal":{"name":"Вісник Національного університету \"Львівська політехніка\"","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Вісник Національного університету \"Львівська політехніка\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.38.262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Annotation. The article analyzes the historical-legal and recent globalization trends in the development of the principle of public participation as a factor of judicial openness. It was established that open governance guarantees transparency, accountability and openness of government, while simultaneously increasing opportunities for citizen participation. It has been proven that it is in demand in the exercise of judicial power. The genesis aspects of the formation of the judiciary were characterized by the fact that the parties to the process depended on the favor of the rulers for the right to participate in the courts: not all individuals were authorized to file lawsuits, testify, serve as a professional or public assessor, even the right to be a plaintiff. The author singled out historical aspects of the development of the openness of the judiciary: overcoming the selectivity of the participation of individuals in the process; development of the accessibility of the judicial process for all without discrimination on various grounds; spreading the openness of judicial information as a means of achieving the legal educational function of the government and a way of preventing crime; the direct connection between the development of the principle of openness and the development of political human rights. The existence of two concepts of the understanding of open justice is motivated: a quick and public trial, based on the norms of law, which are highlighted in the Bill of Rights of the United States of 1791, and the fairness and accessibility of the court, which is highlighted in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950. The global trends of changes in public participation in the judiciary under the influence of the development of the information environment are indicated. The latter provides wider opportunities for access to the court. The openness of the court is not only the main demand of people for judicial work, but also a channel for demonstrating judicial justice. The following problems of the modern stage of legal support of the principle of court openness have been identified: the complexity of guaranteeing (a combination of legal and technical mechanisms) the information availability of the judiciary; providing the latest opportunities for judicial information analysis by overcoming the classic selective approach by using the data systematization method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众参与作为司法开放的关键原则:起源与全球化方面
注释。文章分析了作为司法公开因素的公众参与原则的历史法学发展趋势和近期的全球化趋势。公开治理保证了政府的透明度、问责制和开放性,同时增加了公民参与的机会。事实证明,在司法权的行使中,这是需要的。司法机构形成的起源方面的特点是,这一过程的各方取决于统治者对参与法院的权利的支持:并非所有个人都有权提起诉讼、作证、担任专业或公共评估员,甚至有权成为原告。作者列举了司法开放发展的历史方面:克服个人参与这一过程的选择性;使所有人都能无障碍地利用司法程序,不受各种理由的歧视;扩大司法信息公开是实现政府法制教育功能和预防犯罪的途径;开放原则的发展与政治人权的发展有着直接的联系。对公开司法的理解有两个概念的存在是有动机的:基于法律规范的快速和公开审判,这在1791年的《美国权利法案》中得到了强调;法院的公平和无障碍,这在1950年的《保护人权和基本自由公约》中得到了强调。指出在信息环境发展的影响下,公众司法参与的全球变化趋势。后者提供了更广泛的诉诸法院的机会。法院公开既是人民群众对司法工作的主要要求,也是体现司法公正的渠道。法院公开原则在现代阶段的法律支持存在以下问题:保障司法机构获得信息的复杂性(法律和技术机制的结合);采用数据系统化的方法,克服传统的选择性方法,为司法信息分析提供最新的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Codification of national labor legislation in the context of European integration Legal awareness and the national idea are the basis of a stable state and legal development of society Differences in the criminal law regulations of liability for fraud in the legislation of some foreign countries Local government in Ukraine under the conditions of marital state Ensuring the principle of the right to protection in Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1