A thematic analysis of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence responses to coroners’ concerns’

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of patient safety and risk management Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1177/25160435231202597
Sara Southall, Alison Tariq, Hannah Patrick, Kevin Harris, Chris Bird
{"title":"A thematic analysis of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence responses to coroners’ concerns’","authors":"Sara Southall, Alison Tariq, Hannah Patrick, Kevin Harris, Chris Bird","doi":"10.1177/25160435231202597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In England and Wales, law requires that coroners issue a Prevention of Future Death (PFD) report when they believe that action should be taken to prevent future deaths. Prevention of Future Death reports therefore provide an opportunity to learn and prevent harm. This study thematically analyses PFD reports received by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) along with the organisation's response. We undertook a framework analysis of PFD reports, the organisation's response, and supporting documents or correspondence. Our framework was developed with a deductive approach, with themes pre-selected using areas of interest to the inquiry, including NHS England's national standards for patient safety investigation. The review includes 39 reports dated from 2012 to 2020. Common health areas involved were intrapartum care and head injuries. Coroners frequently raised the issue of a lack of relevant NICE guidance, with NICE most often committing to reflecting on the issues raised through its established processes. Recent responses demonstrated greater consideration of implementation and engagement actions, along with a more collaborative approach and person-centred tone. This report provides insight into the PFD report practices of a national guidance producing and standard setting body in the UK. The report supports system-level understanding of current practices in relation to PFD reports. However, there are no means to assess if the Chief Coroner's Office and the wider safety system considered them an adequate response or whether the actions taken were effective. Recommendations are made to support transparency, learning and collaboration in an evolving patient safety landscape.","PeriodicalId":73888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435231202597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In England and Wales, law requires that coroners issue a Prevention of Future Death (PFD) report when they believe that action should be taken to prevent future deaths. Prevention of Future Death reports therefore provide an opportunity to learn and prevent harm. This study thematically analyses PFD reports received by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) along with the organisation's response. We undertook a framework analysis of PFD reports, the organisation's response, and supporting documents or correspondence. Our framework was developed with a deductive approach, with themes pre-selected using areas of interest to the inquiry, including NHS England's national standards for patient safety investigation. The review includes 39 reports dated from 2012 to 2020. Common health areas involved were intrapartum care and head injuries. Coroners frequently raised the issue of a lack of relevant NICE guidance, with NICE most often committing to reflecting on the issues raised through its established processes. Recent responses demonstrated greater consideration of implementation and engagement actions, along with a more collaborative approach and person-centred tone. This report provides insight into the PFD report practices of a national guidance producing and standard setting body in the UK. The report supports system-level understanding of current practices in relation to PFD reports. However, there are no means to assess if the Chief Coroner's Office and the wider safety system considered them an adequate response or whether the actions taken were effective. Recommendations are made to support transparency, learning and collaboration in an evolving patient safety landscape.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家健康和护理卓越研究所对验尸官担忧的回应的专题分析
在英格兰和威尔士,法律要求验尸官在认为应该采取措施防止未来死亡时,出具一份预防未来死亡(PFD)报告。因此,预防未来死亡报告提供了一个学习和预防伤害的机会。本研究从主题上分析了国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)收到的PFD报告以及该组织的回应。我们对PFD报告、组织的回应以及支持文件或信函进行了框架分析。我们的框架是用演绎的方法开发的,主题是预先选择的,使用了调查感兴趣的领域,包括英国国民保健服务体系的患者安全调查的国家标准。该审查包括2012年至2020年期间的39份报告。涉及的常见保健领域包括产中护理和头部损伤。验尸官经常提出缺乏相关NICE指导的问题,而NICE通常承诺通过其既定流程反思提出的问题。最近的回应显示出对实施和参与行动的更多考虑,以及更具协作性的方法和以人为本的基调。本报告提供了对英国国家指南生产和标准制定机构的PFD报告实践的见解。该报告支持对与PFD报告相关的当前实践的系统级理解。然而,没有办法评估总死因裁判官办公室和更广泛的安全系统是否认为这些措施是适当的反应,或所采取的行动是否有效。在不断变化的患者安全环境中,提出了支持透明度、学习和合作的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB) and safety management systems: An integrated approach to managing safety in healthcare Challenges of integrating patient safety into nursing curricula: An integrative literature review Patient safety near misses – Still missing opportunities to learn A five-step approach to safer skin surgery Gaps in patient safety: Areas that need our attention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1