Green port management practices for sustainable port operations: a multi method study of Asian ports

IF 3.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION Maritime Policy & Management Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1080/03088839.2023.2258125
Kazi Khaled Mahmud, Mohammed Mojahid Hossain Chowdhury, Md. Mostafa Aziz Shaheen
{"title":"Green port management practices for sustainable port operations: a multi method study of Asian ports","authors":"Kazi Khaled Mahmud, Mohammed Mojahid Hossain Chowdhury, Md. Mostafa Aziz Shaheen","doi":"10.1080/03088839.2023.2258125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPorts pose a substantial portion of marine emissions, causing significant health and environmental risks. Providing profitable services in compliance with environmental regulations has become a significant challenge for port authorities. The idea of green port management practices (GPMP) has recently grown as an innovative method for balancing port economic growth with ecological issues. The study systematically reviewed the literature regarding the green port management model and identified an integrated set of drivers of GPMP for sustainable port operations. Besides, an empirical multiple case study methodology was adopted where twelve major Asian ports from developing and developed countries were investigated through a performance-based scoring measurement method based on their GPMP drivers’ implementation status. Finally, the study employed a quantitative fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory model (DEMATEL) to examine the interdependent cause-and-effect connections among the different green port drivers. The study reveals that Singapore is rated highest in green port implementation practices while the Port of Male (Maldives) was classified lowest among 12 Asian ports. Besides, Pollution Control Measures are the most significant driver having the highest influence on all drivers. Automation and digitalization have the most significant causal influence on all the drivers of GPMP, followed by environmental incentives and penalty pricing.KEYWORDS: green portdriversSustainabilityMaritime port industryfuzzy DEMATELAsian Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":18288,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Policy & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maritime Policy & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2023.2258125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTPorts pose a substantial portion of marine emissions, causing significant health and environmental risks. Providing profitable services in compliance with environmental regulations has become a significant challenge for port authorities. The idea of green port management practices (GPMP) has recently grown as an innovative method for balancing port economic growth with ecological issues. The study systematically reviewed the literature regarding the green port management model and identified an integrated set of drivers of GPMP for sustainable port operations. Besides, an empirical multiple case study methodology was adopted where twelve major Asian ports from developing and developed countries were investigated through a performance-based scoring measurement method based on their GPMP drivers’ implementation status. Finally, the study employed a quantitative fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory model (DEMATEL) to examine the interdependent cause-and-effect connections among the different green port drivers. The study reveals that Singapore is rated highest in green port implementation practices while the Port of Male (Maldives) was classified lowest among 12 Asian ports. Besides, Pollution Control Measures are the most significant driver having the highest influence on all drivers. Automation and digitalization have the most significant causal influence on all the drivers of GPMP, followed by environmental incentives and penalty pricing.KEYWORDS: green portdriversSustainabilityMaritime port industryfuzzy DEMATELAsian Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续港口运营的绿色港口管理实践:亚洲港口的多方法研究
摘要港口构成了海洋排放的很大一部分,造成了重大的健康和环境风险。提供符合环境法规的有利可图的服务已成为港口当局面临的重大挑战。绿色港口管理实践(GPMP)的理念最近成为平衡港口经济增长与生态问题的创新方法。本研究系统地回顾了有关绿色港口管理模式的文献,并确定了绿色港口管理模式对可持续港口运营的综合驱动因素。此外,采用实证多案例研究方法,对亚洲12个发展中国家和发达国家的主要港口进行了调查,采用基于绩效的评分测量方法,根据其GPMP司机的实施情况进行了调查。最后,本研究采用定量模糊决策试验与评价实验室模型(DEMATEL)来检验不同绿色港口驱动因素之间的相互依存因果关系。该研究显示,新加坡在绿色港口实施实践方面排名最高,而马累港(马尔代夫)在12个亚洲港口中排名最低。污染控制措施是最重要的驱动因素,对所有驱动因素的影响最大。自动化和数字化对各驱动因素的因果影响最为显著,其次是环境激励和罚款定价。关键词:绿色港口驱动者可持续性海运港口产业模糊demata亚洲披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.60%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Thirty years ago maritime management decisions were taken on the basis of experience and hunch. Today, the experience is augmented by expert analysis and informed by research findings. Maritime Policy & Management provides the latest findings and analyses, and the opportunity for exchanging views through its Comment Section. A multi-disciplinary and international refereed journal, it brings together papers on the different topics that concern the maritime industry. Emphasis is placed on business, organizational, economic, sociolegal and management topics at port, community, shipping company and shipboard levels. The Journal also provides details of conferences and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Special issue on “Green Port and Maritime Shipping” A New wine in new wineskins: unfolding dimension of port-hinterland connectivity and market shares Dividend payments and dividend smoothing in shipping companies The role of port smartness in achieving sustainable development goals Measuring the dynamic term structure of the FFA market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1