Magnus Ericsson, Anton Löf, Olof Löf, Daniel B. Müller
{"title":"Cobalt: corporate concentration 1975–2018","authors":"Magnus Ericsson, Anton Löf, Olof Löf, Daniel B. Müller","doi":"10.1007/s13563-023-00391-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The world’s dependency on cobalt mines in Congo and cobalt refineries in China is seen as serious security issues with potentially dangerous implications for the energy transition. However, Chinese refineries have a similar supply security issue as most of its cobalt concentrates are imported. Most supply security studies take a country perspective on market concentration and supply risks. However, control of the mines and refineries lies with the producing companies, not the governments of the countries where they are located. This paper analyses the corporate structure of the cobalt industry at the mine and the refinery stages over a longer time period to establish changes in the level of corporate concentration and to put the situation in 2018 in perspective. The level of corporate concentration at the mine stage is low and does not raise concerns for market failures or a lack of competitiveness. Corporate concentration of refined cobalt depends on the Chinese government’s influence over Chinese production: if the state control over individual refineries is assumed to be strong, the corporate concentration is high. Mine stage supply security could be strengthened by improving the general political stability in the DRC to make the country more attractive for investors other than the present ones. Increased local beneficiation would strongly benefit Congo and reduce China’s influence. This is a long and complicated process and its success is not at all certain. At the refinery stage, the solution is much easier: reliability of supply could be improved by constructing refineries in countries outside China.","PeriodicalId":44877,"journal":{"name":"Mineral Economics","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mineral Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-023-00391-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract The world’s dependency on cobalt mines in Congo and cobalt refineries in China is seen as serious security issues with potentially dangerous implications for the energy transition. However, Chinese refineries have a similar supply security issue as most of its cobalt concentrates are imported. Most supply security studies take a country perspective on market concentration and supply risks. However, control of the mines and refineries lies with the producing companies, not the governments of the countries where they are located. This paper analyses the corporate structure of the cobalt industry at the mine and the refinery stages over a longer time period to establish changes in the level of corporate concentration and to put the situation in 2018 in perspective. The level of corporate concentration at the mine stage is low and does not raise concerns for market failures or a lack of competitiveness. Corporate concentration of refined cobalt depends on the Chinese government’s influence over Chinese production: if the state control over individual refineries is assumed to be strong, the corporate concentration is high. Mine stage supply security could be strengthened by improving the general political stability in the DRC to make the country more attractive for investors other than the present ones. Increased local beneficiation would strongly benefit Congo and reduce China’s influence. This is a long and complicated process and its success is not at all certain. At the refinery stage, the solution is much easier: reliability of supply could be improved by constructing refineries in countries outside China.
期刊介绍:
Mineral Economics – Raw Materials Report is an international multidisciplinary journal focused on economics and policy issues in the minerals metals and mining industries. The journal exists to improve the understanding of economic social environmental and political implications of natural resources. The main focus is on non-fuel minerals metals and the mining industry and its role in society.Mineral Economics is widening its scope and particularly invites papers on: Socio-economic aspects of mining e.g. social license to operate indigenous peoples theory of change Materials for the Green transition e.g. battery metals ICT elements policies to secure supply of these elements Minerals in the periphery e.g. the Arctic deep-seabed and space Mineral Economics serves as a platform for academics industry practitioners decision makers and other experts who want to share perspectives and knowledge about natural resources.A wide range of topics have traditionally been covered including among others: mineral market analysis exploration and development resource availability market development price formation international trade environmental policy sustainability issues competition issues.Mineral Economics is a joint project of Lule? University of Technology and R?varugruppen Ekonomisk F?rening the organization which founded the journal Raw Materials Report in 1981