A qualitative study of perceived barriers and facilitators to interrupting sedentary behaviour among adults living with obesity

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Science & Practice Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.1002/osp4.721
Fiona Curran, Carol Brennan, James Matthews, Grainne O’ Donoghue
{"title":"A qualitative study of perceived barriers and facilitators to interrupting sedentary behaviour among adults living with obesity","authors":"Fiona Curran, Carol Brennan, James Matthews, Grainne O’ Donoghue","doi":"10.1002/osp4.721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Both obesity and sedentary behaviour (SB), are associated with negative health consequences including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, certain cancers and all‐cause mortality. To date, perceived barriers and facilitators to interrupting SB in adults living with obesity have not been identified. Objective This study aimed to identify these perceived barriers and facilitators by conducting a behavioural analysis underpinned by the theoretical domains framework (TDF) and the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation‐Behaviour (COM‐B) model, to enhance knowledge and inform future intervention development. Methods A purposive and snowball sample (N=21) of adults living with obesity took part in semi‐structured interviews, guided by the TDF, to investigate perceived barriers or facilitators to interrupting SB. Transcribed interviews were inductively coded using reflexive thematic analysis. Key themes and subthemes were generated by grouping similar and recurring codes. Finally, subthemes were mapped to the TDF and COM‐B. Results Five key themes were identified, which influence SB across all domains of living. These relate to (i) physical and mental wellbeing; (ii) motivational readiness; (iii) roles, responsibilities and support; (iv) weight bias and stigma and (v) the environment. These themes were then deductively mapped to all 14 TDF domains and all six of the COM‐B constructs. Conclusion A complex interplay of individual, societal and policy factors contribute to the development and habituation of SB patterns for adults living with obesity. Factors identified in this study could assist in the development of interventions, strategies and policies designed to interrupt or reduce sedentary behaviour for this population. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"9 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Both obesity and sedentary behaviour (SB), are associated with negative health consequences including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, certain cancers and all‐cause mortality. To date, perceived barriers and facilitators to interrupting SB in adults living with obesity have not been identified. Objective This study aimed to identify these perceived barriers and facilitators by conducting a behavioural analysis underpinned by the theoretical domains framework (TDF) and the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation‐Behaviour (COM‐B) model, to enhance knowledge and inform future intervention development. Methods A purposive and snowball sample (N=21) of adults living with obesity took part in semi‐structured interviews, guided by the TDF, to investigate perceived barriers or facilitators to interrupting SB. Transcribed interviews were inductively coded using reflexive thematic analysis. Key themes and subthemes were generated by grouping similar and recurring codes. Finally, subthemes were mapped to the TDF and COM‐B. Results Five key themes were identified, which influence SB across all domains of living. These relate to (i) physical and mental wellbeing; (ii) motivational readiness; (iii) roles, responsibilities and support; (iv) weight bias and stigma and (v) the environment. These themes were then deductively mapped to all 14 TDF domains and all six of the COM‐B constructs. Conclusion A complex interplay of individual, societal and policy factors contribute to the development and habituation of SB patterns for adults living with obesity. Factors identified in this study could assist in the development of interventions, strategies and policies designed to interrupt or reduce sedentary behaviour for this population. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项对肥胖成人中打断久坐行为的感知障碍和促进因素的定性研究
肥胖和久坐行为(SB)都与心血管疾病、糖尿病、某些癌症和全因死亡率等负面健康后果有关。迄今为止,尚未发现肥胖成人中断SB的障碍和促进因素。本研究旨在通过基于理论领域框架(TDF)和能力、机会、动机-行为(COM - B)模型的行为分析来识别这些感知到的障碍和促进因素,以增强知识并为未来的干预发展提供信息。方法在TDF的指导下,有目的的雪球样本(N=21)参与了半结构化访谈,以调查中断SB的感知障碍或促进因素。使用反身性主题分析对转录的访谈进行归纳编码。主要主题和次级主题是通过将类似和重复出现的代码分组产生的。最后,将子主题映射到TDF和COM‐B。结果确定了影响SB生活各个领域的五个关键主题。这些涉及(i)身心健康;(ii)动机准备;(iii)角色、责任和支持;(四)体重偏见和污名化;(五)环境。然后将这些主题演绎映射到所有14个TDF域和所有6个COM - B结构。结论个体因素、社会因素和政策因素共同作用,促进了成人肥胖患者SB模式的发展和习惯化。本研究确定的因素可以帮助制定干预措施、策略和政策,旨在打断或减少这一人群的久坐行为。这篇文章受版权保护。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity Science & Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Behavioral weight loss interventions in college health centers: A qualitative analysis of barriers and facilitators to implementation. A Novel and Comprehensive Wellness Assessment for Lifestyle-Based Interventions. Results of a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial using counseling to augment a digital weight loss program. Predictors of ongoing attendance at an Australian publicly funded specialist obesity service. The impact of weight self-stigma on weight-loss treatment engagement and outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1