Comparison of four types of intrauterine transfusion: effect on fetal hematocrit.

Fetal therapy Pub Date : 1989-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000263434
K J Moise, R J Carpenter, B Kirshon, R L Deter, J D Sala, L E Cano
{"title":"Comparison of four types of intrauterine transfusion: effect on fetal hematocrit.","authors":"K J Moise,&nbsp;R J Carpenter,&nbsp;B Kirshon,&nbsp;R L Deter,&nbsp;J D Sala,&nbsp;L E Cano","doi":"10.1159/000263434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The advent of cordocentesis has made it possible to treat fetuses affected by severe red cell alloimmunization by infusing red cells into umbilical vessels. In addition, serial hematocrits can be followed between transfusions. Twenty fetuses underwent a total of 118 intrauterine procedures. Four transfusion techniques were compared to assess the effect of each method on the stability of the fetal hematocrit between procedures. The change in hematocrit per day for direct intravascular transfusion was -1.06 +/- 0.68%, for intraperitoneal transfusion: +0.03 +/- 0.6%, for combined exchange intravascular and intraperitoneal transfusion: +0.02 +/- 0.3% and for combined direct intravascular and intraperitoneal technique: -0.01 +/- 0.4%. The greatest fall in hematocrit was noted with the use of the direct intravascular technique alone (p less than 0.001). The combined direct intravascular/intraperitoneal approach produces a stable hematocrit between procedures and offers the possibility of performing intrauterine transfusions at less frequent intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":77713,"journal":{"name":"Fetal therapy","volume":"4 2-3","pages":"126-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000263434","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000263434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

The advent of cordocentesis has made it possible to treat fetuses affected by severe red cell alloimmunization by infusing red cells into umbilical vessels. In addition, serial hematocrits can be followed between transfusions. Twenty fetuses underwent a total of 118 intrauterine procedures. Four transfusion techniques were compared to assess the effect of each method on the stability of the fetal hematocrit between procedures. The change in hematocrit per day for direct intravascular transfusion was -1.06 +/- 0.68%, for intraperitoneal transfusion: +0.03 +/- 0.6%, for combined exchange intravascular and intraperitoneal transfusion: +0.02 +/- 0.3% and for combined direct intravascular and intraperitoneal technique: -0.01 +/- 0.4%. The greatest fall in hematocrit was noted with the use of the direct intravascular technique alone (p less than 0.001). The combined direct intravascular/intraperitoneal approach produces a stable hematocrit between procedures and offers the possibility of performing intrauterine transfusions at less frequent intervals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四种宫内输血方式对胎儿红细胞压积的影响。
脐带穿刺术的出现使得通过向脐带血管注入红细胞来治疗严重红细胞异体免疫影响的胎儿成为可能。此外,可以在两次输血之间跟踪连续的血细胞比容。20个胎儿总共接受了118次宫内手术。我们比较了四种输血技术,以评估每种方法对胎儿红细胞压积稳定性的影响。直接血管内输血每日红细胞压积变化为-1.06 +/- 0.68%,腹腔内输血:+0.03 +/- 0.6%,联合交换血管内和腹腔内输血:+0.02 +/- 0.3%,直接血管内和腹腔内联合技术:-0.01 +/- 0.4%。单独使用直接血管内技术时,红细胞压积下降幅度最大(p < 0.001)。直接血管内/腹腔联合入路在两次手术之间产生稳定的红细胞压积,并提供以较低间隔进行宫内输血的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fetal Infections: Immune Response to Infections during Fetal Life Twin-to-Twin Transfusion Syndrome: Placental and Fetal Pathogenesis Human Genetics and Fetal Disease: Assessment of the Fetal Genome A Fetal Origin of Adult Disease Fetal Cerebral Consequences of Structural Heart Disease: Can These Be Ameliorated?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1