M Yokota, K Kubo, T Setoguchi, H Hosaka, M Machigashira, T Sueda
{"title":"[Influence of residual plaque score during initial treatment on pocket reduction rate at individual tooth surfaces].","authors":"M Yokota, K Kubo, T Setoguchi, H Hosaka, M Machigashira, T Sueda","doi":"10.2329/perio.31.1182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to examine the relation ship between residual plaque score at an individual tooth surface during initial treatment and the pocket reduction rate at the evaluation time. Thirty-nine adult periodontal patients (mean age 30.2 years) who O'Leary plaque control record (PCR) reached a level of 10% PCR, were selected for this study. A total of 5638 surfaces were monitored by recording probing pocket depths at the disto-buccal (a), mid-buccal (b), mesio-buccal (c), disto-lingual (d), mid-lingual and (e), mesio-lingual (f) regions, and by examining O'Leary plaque control records. The results were as follows: 1) The residual plaque score at all teeth surfaces was 14.74 +/- 19.21%. 2) The lowest plaque score were seen at 54/45, and 21/12. 3) The highest plaque score were seen at 7/7, and 76/67. 4) Well-responding sites that showed a high residual plaque score and a good pocket reduction rate, were 5/5 (initial probing pocket depth 3.0-3.5mm, a), and 4/4 (initial probing pocket depth 3.0-3.5 mm,f; 5.0-5.5 mm, f). 5) 7/7 (initial probing pocket depth 3.0 mm a, b, d), and 7/7 (initial probing pocket depth 3.0-3.5 mm, f) showed a high residual plaque score and a low pocket reduction rate. 6) The normal pocket response occurred at a level of residual plaque score and a low pocket reduction rate. 6) The normal pocket response occurred at a level of residual plaque score of less than 25%. In order to gain good pocket response, it is important to keep the level of residual plaque score at less than 25% rather than to keep the level of PCR at 10% or 20% (as several authors have previously stated). 7) A low residual plaque score during treatment is therefore more important than a low PCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":19428,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai kaishi","volume":"31 4","pages":"1182-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai kaishi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2329/perio.31.1182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the relation ship between residual plaque score at an individual tooth surface during initial treatment and the pocket reduction rate at the evaluation time. Thirty-nine adult periodontal patients (mean age 30.2 years) who O'Leary plaque control record (PCR) reached a level of 10% PCR, were selected for this study. A total of 5638 surfaces were monitored by recording probing pocket depths at the disto-buccal (a), mid-buccal (b), mesio-buccal (c), disto-lingual (d), mid-lingual and (e), mesio-lingual (f) regions, and by examining O'Leary plaque control records. The results were as follows: 1) The residual plaque score at all teeth surfaces was 14.74 +/- 19.21%. 2) The lowest plaque score were seen at 54/45, and 21/12. 3) The highest plaque score were seen at 7/7, and 76/67. 4) Well-responding sites that showed a high residual plaque score and a good pocket reduction rate, were 5/5 (initial probing pocket depth 3.0-3.5mm, a), and 4/4 (initial probing pocket depth 3.0-3.5 mm,f; 5.0-5.5 mm, f). 5) 7/7 (initial probing pocket depth 3.0 mm a, b, d), and 7/7 (initial probing pocket depth 3.0-3.5 mm, f) showed a high residual plaque score and a low pocket reduction rate. 6) The normal pocket response occurred at a level of residual plaque score and a low pocket reduction rate. 6) The normal pocket response occurred at a level of residual plaque score of less than 25%. In order to gain good pocket response, it is important to keep the level of residual plaque score at less than 25% rather than to keep the level of PCR at 10% or 20% (as several authors have previously stated). 7) A low residual plaque score during treatment is therefore more important than a low PCR.
本研究的目的是研究初始治疗时单个牙齿表面残留菌斑评分与评估时牙袋缩小率之间的关系。本研究选择39例O’leary菌斑控制记录(PCR)达到10% PCR水平的成人牙周患者(平均年龄30.2岁)。通过记录颊散区(A)、中颊区(b)、中颊区(c)、舌散区(d)、中舌区和(e)、中舌区(f)的探测袋深度,以及检查O’leary斑块对照记录,共监测5638个表面。结果表明:1)各牙面残留菌斑评分为14.74±19.21%。2)斑块评分最低,分别为54/45和21/12。3)斑块评分最高,分别为7/7和76/67。4)残留菌斑评分高、牙袋缩小率高的反应部位分别为5/5(初始探袋深度3.0-3.5mm, a)和4/4(初始探袋深度3.0-3.5mm, f);5.0-5.5 mm, f), 5) 7/7(初始探测袋深3.0 mm a, b, d)和7/7(初始探测袋深3.0-3.5 mm, f)显示残留菌斑评分高,口袋减少率低。6)在残余斑块评分水平和低袋缩小率的情况下,出现正常的袋反应。6)当残余斑块评分低于25%时,出现正常的斑块袋反应。为了获得良好的口袋反应,重要的是将残留斑块评分水平保持在25%以下,而不是将PCR水平保持在10%或20%(正如几位作者先前所述)。7)因此,治疗期间低残留斑块评分比低PCR更重要。