[Influence of residual plaque score during initial treatment on pocket reduction rate at individual tooth surfaces].

M Yokota, K Kubo, T Setoguchi, H Hosaka, M Machigashira, T Sueda
{"title":"[Influence of residual plaque score during initial treatment on pocket reduction rate at individual tooth surfaces].","authors":"M Yokota,&nbsp;K Kubo,&nbsp;T Setoguchi,&nbsp;H Hosaka,&nbsp;M Machigashira,&nbsp;T Sueda","doi":"10.2329/perio.31.1182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to examine the relation ship between residual plaque score at an individual tooth surface during initial treatment and the pocket reduction rate at the evaluation time. Thirty-nine adult periodontal patients (mean age 30.2 years) who O'Leary plaque control record (PCR) reached a level of 10% PCR, were selected for this study. A total of 5638 surfaces were monitored by recording probing pocket depths at the disto-buccal (a), mid-buccal (b), mesio-buccal (c), disto-lingual (d), mid-lingual and (e), mesio-lingual (f) regions, and by examining O'Leary plaque control records. The results were as follows: 1) The residual plaque score at all teeth surfaces was 14.74 +/- 19.21%. 2) The lowest plaque score were seen at 54/45, and 21/12. 3) The highest plaque score were seen at 7/7, and 76/67. 4) Well-responding sites that showed a high residual plaque score and a good pocket reduction rate, were 5/5 (initial probing pocket depth 3.0-3.5mm, a), and 4/4 (initial probing pocket depth 3.0-3.5 mm,f; 5.0-5.5 mm, f). 5) 7/7 (initial probing pocket depth 3.0 mm a, b, d), and 7/7 (initial probing pocket depth 3.0-3.5 mm, f) showed a high residual plaque score and a low pocket reduction rate. 6) The normal pocket response occurred at a level of residual plaque score and a low pocket reduction rate. 6) The normal pocket response occurred at a level of residual plaque score of less than 25%. In order to gain good pocket response, it is important to keep the level of residual plaque score at less than 25% rather than to keep the level of PCR at 10% or 20% (as several authors have previously stated). 7) A low residual plaque score during treatment is therefore more important than a low PCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":19428,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai kaishi","volume":"31 4","pages":"1182-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai kaishi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2329/perio.31.1182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relation ship between residual plaque score at an individual tooth surface during initial treatment and the pocket reduction rate at the evaluation time. Thirty-nine adult periodontal patients (mean age 30.2 years) who O'Leary plaque control record (PCR) reached a level of 10% PCR, were selected for this study. A total of 5638 surfaces were monitored by recording probing pocket depths at the disto-buccal (a), mid-buccal (b), mesio-buccal (c), disto-lingual (d), mid-lingual and (e), mesio-lingual (f) regions, and by examining O'Leary plaque control records. The results were as follows: 1) The residual plaque score at all teeth surfaces was 14.74 +/- 19.21%. 2) The lowest plaque score were seen at 54/45, and 21/12. 3) The highest plaque score were seen at 7/7, and 76/67. 4) Well-responding sites that showed a high residual plaque score and a good pocket reduction rate, were 5/5 (initial probing pocket depth 3.0-3.5mm, a), and 4/4 (initial probing pocket depth 3.0-3.5 mm,f; 5.0-5.5 mm, f). 5) 7/7 (initial probing pocket depth 3.0 mm a, b, d), and 7/7 (initial probing pocket depth 3.0-3.5 mm, f) showed a high residual plaque score and a low pocket reduction rate. 6) The normal pocket response occurred at a level of residual plaque score and a low pocket reduction rate. 6) The normal pocket response occurred at a level of residual plaque score of less than 25%. In order to gain good pocket response, it is important to keep the level of residual plaque score at less than 25% rather than to keep the level of PCR at 10% or 20% (as several authors have previously stated). 7) A low residual plaque score during treatment is therefore more important than a low PCR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[初始治疗期间残留菌斑评分对单个牙齿表面袋缩小率的影响]。
本研究的目的是研究初始治疗时单个牙齿表面残留菌斑评分与评估时牙袋缩小率之间的关系。本研究选择39例O’leary菌斑控制记录(PCR)达到10% PCR水平的成人牙周患者(平均年龄30.2岁)。通过记录颊散区(A)、中颊区(b)、中颊区(c)、舌散区(d)、中舌区和(e)、中舌区(f)的探测袋深度,以及检查O’leary斑块对照记录,共监测5638个表面。结果表明:1)各牙面残留菌斑评分为14.74±19.21%。2)斑块评分最低,分别为54/45和21/12。3)斑块评分最高,分别为7/7和76/67。4)残留菌斑评分高、牙袋缩小率高的反应部位分别为5/5(初始探袋深度3.0-3.5mm, a)和4/4(初始探袋深度3.0-3.5mm, f);5.0-5.5 mm, f), 5) 7/7(初始探测袋深3.0 mm a, b, d)和7/7(初始探测袋深3.0-3.5 mm, f)显示残留菌斑评分高,口袋减少率低。6)在残余斑块评分水平和低袋缩小率的情况下,出现正常的袋反应。6)当残余斑块评分低于25%时,出现正常的斑块袋反应。为了获得良好的口袋反应,重要的是将残留斑块评分水平保持在25%以下,而不是将PCR水平保持在10%或20%(正如几位作者先前所述)。7)因此,治疗期间低残留斑块评分比低PCR更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Experimental studies on morphological changes of microvascular architecture following the free gingival autograft on denuded alveolar bone]. [A study of lipopolysaccharide derived from Bacteroides gingivalis]. [Distribution of enzymatically pathogenic bacteria from periodontal pocket in advancing periodontitis]. [The effect of superoxide dismutase on the inflammation induced by periodontal pathogenic bacteria and wound healing of gingival incision]. [Immunohistochemical localization of the chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan in demineralized rat periodontal tissue].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1