Radioguided occult lesion localisation: A retrospective audit at a single tertiary academic breast unit

Sumaya Ismail, Francois Malherbe, Eugenio Panieri, Lydia Cairncross, Gaseeda Boltman, Florence E. Davidson
{"title":"Radioguided occult lesion localisation: A retrospective audit at a single tertiary academic breast unit","authors":"Sumaya Ismail, Francois Malherbe, Eugenio Panieri, Lydia Cairncross, Gaseeda Boltman, Florence E. Davidson","doi":"10.4102/sajo.v7i0.233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) technique was introduced at Groote Schuur Hospital in 2003 replacing the wire-guided localisation (WGL) technique. In the case of preoperative histologically proven impalpable breast cancers, a sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy was done simultaneously (sentinel node [SN] with occult lesion localisation or SNOLL).Aim: To assess the efficacy of the ROLL and SNOLL techniques for diagnostic and therapeutic excisions.Setting: A retrospective record analysis of 190 patients who underwent a ROLL procedure for diagnostic or therapeutic excision of occult breast lesions was performed at a large tertiary hospital in the Western Cape.Methods: Data were collected on patient and tumour characteristics, successful localisation rates, the volume of tissue removed, complete tumour resection rates, the number of re-operations performed and the proportion of SLN detection. The Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to test for significance between variables at α = 0.05.Results: Correct radiopharmaceutical placement was achieved in 177/190 (93.2%) lesions. Histologic examination of excised specimens confirmed 115/190 (61.0%) malignant and 75/190 (39.0%) benign lesions. Involved margins were found in 37/115 (32.2%). Complete excision with adequate margins occurred in 50/70 (71.4%) of cases of invasive cancer and in 11/45 (24.4%) of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The SN was successfully identified in 30/37 (81.1%) of SNOLL cases.Conclusion: Radioguided occult lesion localisation is an effective tool in the preoperative localisation of occult lesions for surgical biopsy as well as the removal of impalpable breast cancers. A single intratumoural injection with 99mTc nanocolloid combined with lymphoscintigraphy is a reliable method of localising the SN.","PeriodicalId":52950,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Oncology","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajo.v7i0.233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) technique was introduced at Groote Schuur Hospital in 2003 replacing the wire-guided localisation (WGL) technique. In the case of preoperative histologically proven impalpable breast cancers, a sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy was done simultaneously (sentinel node [SN] with occult lesion localisation or SNOLL).Aim: To assess the efficacy of the ROLL and SNOLL techniques for diagnostic and therapeutic excisions.Setting: A retrospective record analysis of 190 patients who underwent a ROLL procedure for diagnostic or therapeutic excision of occult breast lesions was performed at a large tertiary hospital in the Western Cape.Methods: Data were collected on patient and tumour characteristics, successful localisation rates, the volume of tissue removed, complete tumour resection rates, the number of re-operations performed and the proportion of SLN detection. The Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to test for significance between variables at α = 0.05.Results: Correct radiopharmaceutical placement was achieved in 177/190 (93.2%) lesions. Histologic examination of excised specimens confirmed 115/190 (61.0%) malignant and 75/190 (39.0%) benign lesions. Involved margins were found in 37/115 (32.2%). Complete excision with adequate margins occurred in 50/70 (71.4%) of cases of invasive cancer and in 11/45 (24.4%) of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The SN was successfully identified in 30/37 (81.1%) of SNOLL cases.Conclusion: Radioguided occult lesion localisation is an effective tool in the preoperative localisation of occult lesions for surgical biopsy as well as the removal of impalpable breast cancers. A single intratumoural injection with 99mTc nanocolloid combined with lymphoscintigraphy is a reliable method of localising the SN.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射性引导隐匿性病灶定位:回顾性审计在一个单一的三级学术乳房单位
背景:2003年,grote Schuur医院引入了放射引导隐匿性病变定位(ROLL)技术,取代了线导定位(WGL)技术。在术前组织学证实摸不到的乳腺癌病例中,同时进行前哨淋巴结(SLN)活检(前哨淋巴结[SN]与隐匿性病变定位或SNOLL)。目的:评价ROLL和SNOLL技术在诊断性和治疗性手术中的应用效果。背景:在西开普省的一家大型三级医院,对190名接受ROLL手术诊断或治疗性切除隐匿性乳腺病变的患者进行了回顾性记录分析。方法:收集患者及肿瘤特征、成功定位率、切除组织体积、肿瘤完全切除率、再手术次数及SLN检出率等资料。采用皮尔逊卡方检验检验变量间的显著性,α = 0.05。结果:170 /190例(93.2%)病灶放射性药物放置正确。切除标本组织学检查证实115/190(61.0%)为恶性病变,75/190(39.0%)为良性病变。37/115(32.2%)发现受累边缘。50/70(71.4%)的浸润性癌和11/45(24.4%)的导管原位癌(DCIS)有足够边缘的完全切除。37例snl病例中有30例(81.1%)成功诊断出SN。结论:放射引导下隐匿性病变定位是手术活检术前隐匿性病变定位的有效工具,也是切除难以触及的乳腺癌的有效工具。单次肿瘤内注射99mTc纳米胶体并结合淋巴显像是定位SN的可靠方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Awareness of External Breast Prosthesis, it’s availability and affordability in Eastern Nigeria Quantitative exploration of barriers to access cancer services experienced by cancer patients in Lesotho DNA methylation microarray analysis of adult gliomas: A pilot study at Groote Schuur Hospital Treatment outcomes of Epstein-Barr virus-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma Epidemiology of head and neck cancer in a Johannesburg Hospital: A file review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1