Cooperation and the Organisation of Production and Markets: A Critical Survey

Q3 Social Sciences Contributions to Political Economy Pub Date : 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1093/cpe/bzad001
Suzanne J Konzelmann
{"title":"Cooperation and the Organisation of Production and Markets: A Critical Survey","authors":"Suzanne J Konzelmann","doi":"10.1093/cpe/bzad001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This critical survey examines the role of cooperation in production and exchange, the relationship between the organisation of production and markets, and, more generally, the nature and functioning of productive systems. It traces ideas about the relationship between markets, industrial organisation, and power, from Adam Smith and Karl Marx to the early neo-classical economists, before turning to the evolution of liberal economic thinking that accompanied the emergence and growth of large organisations with market power. This is then confronted with Alfred Marshall’s methodological and theoretical contributions to both economics and industrial organisation and development, and his attempt to reconcile the neo-classical economic dilemma of increasing returns in production and competition in markets. During the inter-war years, and especially after his death in 1924, Marshall’s ideas were strongly challenged—and ultimately abandoned—by neo-classical economists. However, this debate re-emerged nearly a half century later, when the Fordist mass production model faced growing competition from more cooperative forms of industrial organisation. Based on solid empirical research into contemporary industrial districts and localised productive systems, there was a re-discovery of the importance of cooperation in production, and an acknowledgement of the significance of Marshall’s earlier contributions. Inspired by these developments, Frank Wilkinson’s ‘productive systems’ approach brings together the threads running through Smith’s, Marx’s, and Marshall’s analysis of the dynamics of cooperation in production and exchange, to explore the implications of the mutual and conflicting interests inherent to production, industrial organisation, and economic development.","PeriodicalId":38730,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to Political Economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cpe/bzad001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This critical survey examines the role of cooperation in production and exchange, the relationship between the organisation of production and markets, and, more generally, the nature and functioning of productive systems. It traces ideas about the relationship between markets, industrial organisation, and power, from Adam Smith and Karl Marx to the early neo-classical economists, before turning to the evolution of liberal economic thinking that accompanied the emergence and growth of large organisations with market power. This is then confronted with Alfred Marshall’s methodological and theoretical contributions to both economics and industrial organisation and development, and his attempt to reconcile the neo-classical economic dilemma of increasing returns in production and competition in markets. During the inter-war years, and especially after his death in 1924, Marshall’s ideas were strongly challenged—and ultimately abandoned—by neo-classical economists. However, this debate re-emerged nearly a half century later, when the Fordist mass production model faced growing competition from more cooperative forms of industrial organisation. Based on solid empirical research into contemporary industrial districts and localised productive systems, there was a re-discovery of the importance of cooperation in production, and an acknowledgement of the significance of Marshall’s earlier contributions. Inspired by these developments, Frank Wilkinson’s ‘productive systems’ approach brings together the threads running through Smith’s, Marx’s, and Marshall’s analysis of the dynamics of cooperation in production and exchange, to explore the implications of the mutual and conflicting interests inherent to production, industrial organisation, and economic development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生产与市场的合作与组织:一项重要调查
摘要:这一重要调查研究了合作在生产和交换中的作用,生产组织和市场之间的关系,以及更一般地说,生产系统的性质和功能。该书追溯了从亚当•斯密(Adam Smith)和卡尔•马克思(Karl Marx)到早期新古典经济学家关于市场、产业组织和权力之间关系的观点,然后转向自由主义经济思想的演变,这种思想伴随着拥有市场力量的大型组织的出现和成长。然后,阿尔弗雷德·马歇尔(Alfred Marshall)在经济学和产业组织与发展方面的方法论和理论贡献,以及他试图调和生产回报增加和市场竞争这一新古典经济学困境的努力,都将面临这一挑战。在两次世界大战期间,特别是在他1924年去世后,马歇尔的思想受到了新古典经济学家的强烈挑战,并最终被抛弃。然而,近半个世纪后,当福特主义的大规模生产模式面临来自更具合作性的工业组织形式日益激烈的竞争时,这一争论再次出现。基于对当代工业区和本地化生产系统的坚实实证研究,重新发现了合作在生产中的重要性,并承认了马歇尔早期贡献的重要性。受这些发展的启发,弗兰克·威尔金森的“生产系统”方法汇集了贯穿史密斯、马克思和马歇尔对生产和交换合作动态分析的线索,以探索生产、产业组织和经济发展中固有的相互利益和冲突利益的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contributions to Political Economy
Contributions to Political Economy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Contributions to Political Economy provides a forum for the academic discussion of original ideas and arguments drawn from important critical traditions in economic analysis. Articles fall broadly within the lines of thought associated with the work of the Classical political economists, Marx, Keynes, and Sraffa. While the majority of articles are theoretical and historical in emphasis, the journal welcomes articles of a more applied character. It also reviews noteworthy books recently published.
期刊最新文献
Economics Imperialism then and now: Ben Fine on the Changing Relationship between Economics and the Other Social Sciences Money and Its Body in the Social Positioning and Credit Perspectives: Review Article of Samuel A. Chambers’ Money has No Value The Origins and Dynamics of Inequality: Sex, Politics, and Ideology The Place of Law In Political Economy. J.R.Commons’ Legal Foundations of Capitalism at 100: A Retrospective Article Pasinetti on The Cambridge Keynesians*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1