Earnings management, capital management, signalling and the Covid-19 pandemic: the case of listed banks in the United States

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1815
Ikechukwu Ndu, , Emmanuel Anoruo, Chiaku Chukwuogor
{"title":"Earnings management, capital management, signalling and the Covid-19 pandemic: the case of listed banks in the United States","authors":"Ikechukwu Ndu, , Emmanuel Anoruo, Chiaku Chukwuogor","doi":"10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose- This paper investigates earnings management, capital management, the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and signalling by United States listed banks of loan loss provisions. This study is particularly important because there is a relative dearth of research in banking on these topics and thus remain considerably under researched. Methodology- The dataset comprises a pooled cross-sectional and time series data for a sample of 249 U.S. listed banks for the period 2015 to 2020 consisting of 1,494 observations. A panel data analysis is conducted. Findings- Results overall show no evidence of systematic earnings management, capital management or signaling by the banks. Findings reveal the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic is not significant during this period of economic fragility for listed banks. The elasticity of loan loss provisions with regards to the annual growth in gross domestic product is negative and statistically significant overall. This is evidence that U.S. listed banks’ loan loss provisioning exhibits a pro-cyclical nature. Overall, these results provide evidence of the success of restrictions due to tighter bank regulation and supervision that came into effect at the end of 2014. This required U.S. banks to maintain a minimum common equity tier 1 capital ratio of 4 percent, a minimum tier 1 capital ratio of 5.5 percent, a minimum total capital ratio of 8 percent, and a minimum leverage ratio of 4 percent. Conclusion- This study adds to the literature as it provides evidence that restrictions on bank activities in the form of minimum capital and leverage ratios at the end of 2014, restrictions in the use of bank capital, and extension of financial support via government intervention funding during the Covid-19 pandemic crisis period have reduced incentives to smooth earnings in the United States banking system. It therefore represents a tried and tested model that can be adopted by banking systems in other countries. Keywords: Banks, capital management, COVID-19 pandemic, earnings management, loan loss provision, signalling. JEL Codes: M41, G21, C23, G28","PeriodicalId":15124,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose- This paper investigates earnings management, capital management, the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and signalling by United States listed banks of loan loss provisions. This study is particularly important because there is a relative dearth of research in banking on these topics and thus remain considerably under researched. Methodology- The dataset comprises a pooled cross-sectional and time series data for a sample of 249 U.S. listed banks for the period 2015 to 2020 consisting of 1,494 observations. A panel data analysis is conducted. Findings- Results overall show no evidence of systematic earnings management, capital management or signaling by the banks. Findings reveal the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic is not significant during this period of economic fragility for listed banks. The elasticity of loan loss provisions with regards to the annual growth in gross domestic product is negative and statistically significant overall. This is evidence that U.S. listed banks’ loan loss provisioning exhibits a pro-cyclical nature. Overall, these results provide evidence of the success of restrictions due to tighter bank regulation and supervision that came into effect at the end of 2014. This required U.S. banks to maintain a minimum common equity tier 1 capital ratio of 4 percent, a minimum tier 1 capital ratio of 5.5 percent, a minimum total capital ratio of 8 percent, and a minimum leverage ratio of 4 percent. Conclusion- This study adds to the literature as it provides evidence that restrictions on bank activities in the form of minimum capital and leverage ratios at the end of 2014, restrictions in the use of bank capital, and extension of financial support via government intervention funding during the Covid-19 pandemic crisis period have reduced incentives to smooth earnings in the United States banking system. It therefore represents a tried and tested model that can be adopted by banking systems in other countries. Keywords: Banks, capital management, COVID-19 pandemic, earnings management, loan loss provision, signalling. JEL Codes: M41, G21, C23, G28
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
盈余管理、资本管理、信号和Covid-19大流行:以美国上市银行为例
目的-本文研究盈余管理、资本管理、Covid-19大流行的影响以及美国上市银行对贷款损失拨备的信号。这项研究是特别重要的,因为银行业在这些主题上的研究相对缺乏,因此研究仍然相当不足。方法:该数据集包括2015年至2020年期间249家美国上市银行样本的汇总横截面和时间序列数据,包括1,494项观察结果。进行了面板数据分析。调查结果-总体结果显示,没有证据表明银行有系统的盈余管理、资本管理或信号。调查结果显示,在这一经济脆弱时期,Covid-19大流行对上市银行的影响并不显著。贷款损失准备金的弹性与国内生产总值的年增长率总体上是负的,在统计上是显著的。这表明,美国上市银行的贷款损失拨备具有顺周期性质。总的来说,这些结果证明,由于2014年底开始实施的更严格的银行监管,限制措施取得了成功。这要求美国银行维持最低的普通股一级资本比率为4%,最低的一级资本比率为5.5%,最低的总资本比率为8%,最低的杠杆率为4%。结论:本研究补充了文献,因为它提供了证据,表明2014年底以最低资本和杠杆率的形式对银行活动的限制,对银行资本使用的限制,以及在Covid-19大流行危机期间通过政府干预资金延长金融支持,降低了美国银行体系平稳盈利的激励。因此,它代表了一种久经考验的模式,可以为其他国家的银行体系所采用。关键词:银行、资本管理、新冠疫情、盈余管理、贷款损失拨备、信号JEL代码:M41, G21, C23, G28
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The meaning and practice of inclusion AMIDST gender diversity on boards of public sector organizations in Uganda COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TALENT MANAGEMENT AT THE LEVEL OF ACADEMIC STUDIES THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF BRAND LIKEABILITY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRAND IMAGE AND CONSPICUOUS CONSUMPTION DETERMINATION OF NEW FLIGHT ROUTE WITH DEA METHOD IN AIRLINE OPERATIONS INVESTIGATION OF TURKIYE S PERSPECTIVE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BY COUNTRY WITH MULTIVARIABLE STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1