Green industry experts’ consensus about wildlife-friendly landscape maintenance: Delphi-informed implications for agricultural and extension educators

Dharmendra Kalauni, Laura A. Warner, Colby J. Silvert, Cody Gusto, John M. Diaz, Jaret Daniels
{"title":"Green industry experts’ consensus about wildlife-friendly landscape maintenance: Delphi-informed implications for agricultural and extension educators","authors":"Dharmendra Kalauni, Laura A. Warner, Colby J. Silvert, Cody Gusto, John M. Diaz, Jaret Daniels","doi":"10.5032/jae.v64i3.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was designed to understand the current state of wildlife-friendly landscape maintenance practices and the associated barriers and motivations among Florida green industry professionals. A Delphi technique to achieve consensus, along with descriptive survey questions, was used to facilitate feedback from Florida-based green industry professionals and Extension professionals. The expert panel identified 55 wildlife-friendly landscape activities, 25 barrier items, and 25 motivator items. Descriptive findings showed that green industry professionals believe, on average, Florida residents request wildlife-friendly maintenance services less frequently than wildlife-friendly landscape services are offered by Florida green industry professionals. Consensus findings demonstrated the barriers with the greatest agreement were a lack of public awareness about wildlife-friendly landscaping, its ecological and environmental benefits, professional focus on profit, homeowner association (HOA) regulations, and demand for formal landscape aesthetics. Consensus findings also revealed Florida green industry’s major motivators were clients’ demand for native, Florida-Friendly plants and wildlife-supporting landscapes, the desire to promote the company as wildlife-friendly, and public interest in native and Florida-Friendly Landscaping. Extension professionals, along with policymakers, educators, and program planners should reduce the identified barriers and expand on the motivators to encourage green industry professionals to engage in landscape maintenance activities that support wildlife.","PeriodicalId":73589,"journal":{"name":"Journal of agricultural education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of agricultural education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i3.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study was designed to understand the current state of wildlife-friendly landscape maintenance practices and the associated barriers and motivations among Florida green industry professionals. A Delphi technique to achieve consensus, along with descriptive survey questions, was used to facilitate feedback from Florida-based green industry professionals and Extension professionals. The expert panel identified 55 wildlife-friendly landscape activities, 25 barrier items, and 25 motivator items. Descriptive findings showed that green industry professionals believe, on average, Florida residents request wildlife-friendly maintenance services less frequently than wildlife-friendly landscape services are offered by Florida green industry professionals. Consensus findings demonstrated the barriers with the greatest agreement were a lack of public awareness about wildlife-friendly landscaping, its ecological and environmental benefits, professional focus on profit, homeowner association (HOA) regulations, and demand for formal landscape aesthetics. Consensus findings also revealed Florida green industry’s major motivators were clients’ demand for native, Florida-Friendly plants and wildlife-supporting landscapes, the desire to promote the company as wildlife-friendly, and public interest in native and Florida-Friendly Landscaping. Extension professionals, along with policymakers, educators, and program planners should reduce the identified barriers and expand on the motivators to encourage green industry professionals to engage in landscape maintenance activities that support wildlife.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色产业专家关于野生动物友好型景观维护的共识:德尔福对农业和推广教育者的启示
本研究旨在了解野生动物友好型景观维护实践的现状,以及佛罗里达州绿色产业专业人员的相关障碍和动机。采用德尔菲技术达成共识,同时采用描述性调查问题,以促进来自佛罗里达州绿色产业专业人员和推广专业人员的反馈。专家小组确定了55项野生动物友好景观活动、25项屏障项目和25项激励项目。描述性调查结果显示,绿色产业专业人士认为,平均而言,佛罗里达州居民要求野生动物友好的维护服务的频率低于佛罗里达州绿色产业专业人士提供的野生动物友好景观服务。调查结果显示,公众对野生动物友好型景观、生态和环境效益缺乏认识、专业人士对利润的关注、房主协会(HOA)法规以及对正式景观美学的需求是最一致的障碍。一致的调查结果还显示,佛罗里达绿色产业的主要动机是客户对原生的、对佛罗里达友好的植物和支持野生动物的景观的需求,促进公司对野生动物友好的愿望,以及公众对原生和对佛罗里达友好的景观的兴趣。推广专业人员,以及政策制定者、教育工作者和项目规划者应该减少已确定的障碍,并扩大激励因素,以鼓励绿色产业专业人员参与支持野生动物的景观维护活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The dualism of interdisciplinarity: A model for agriculture, food, and natural resources education Student interest in the national council for agricultural education career pathways AFNR educators’ experiences in an MA program Technical agriculture skills teachers need to teach courses in the animal systems pathway Preparing pre-service agricultural education teachers to teach agricultural mechanics: Are we doing enough?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1