The Reported Side Effects Of Hormonal Contraception By Women Of Reproductive Age In Selected Hospitals In Enugu: Truth Or Myth

Anonde Chinedu Matthew, Obinna Onwujekwe, Itodo Samuel Olusegun, Itodo Miracle Chekwube
{"title":"The Reported Side Effects Of Hormonal Contraception By Women Of Reproductive Age In Selected Hospitals In Enugu: Truth Or Myth","authors":"Anonde Chinedu Matthew, Obinna Onwujekwe, Itodo Samuel Olusegun, Itodo Miracle Chekwube","doi":"10.58806/ijhmr.2023.v2i9n13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many unwanted pregnancies and its associated complications have resulted from refusal of some women of reproductive age to the use of contraceptives in general particularly the hormonal contraceptive in our environment. The fear of side effects, religious belief, ignorance and other myths surrounding the use of contraceptives had contributed to this. The main objective of the study was to find out if the reported side effects of hormonal contraceptives by women of reproductive age in Enugu, South Eastern Nigeria, are truth or myth. It was a combination of prospective and retrospective study with interviewer administered questionnaire to assess socio-demographic data, reasons why some women were not using hormonal contraceptives, side effects and benefits of hormonal contraceptives. From the 410 respondents, the study showed that 232 respondents (56.6%, X2=7.686) of respondents used hormonal contraceptive which was significant (p<0.05). 178respondents (43.4%) respondents did not use hormonal contraception. 76.0% of the hormonal contraceptives users had side effects while 24.0% did not. Irregular menses (44.4%) was the commonest side effect.130 respondents (73.0%) gave reasons such as religious belief, ignorance, fear of side effects etc as preventing factors to the use of contraceptives. The study showed that 69.8% of users were not discouraged by side effects and 81.1% agreed to recommend it to their friends and family relatives because of its numerous benefits. While it was true from the study that hormonal contraceptives was associated with some side effects of which some disappeared without intervention within 3-5 months of use (35.1%), and others were taken care of through medical interventions, some myths(religious belief, ignorance, husband approval, etc) were also limitations against hormonal contraceptives use.","PeriodicalId":51699,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58806/ijhmr.2023.v2i9n13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many unwanted pregnancies and its associated complications have resulted from refusal of some women of reproductive age to the use of contraceptives in general particularly the hormonal contraceptive in our environment. The fear of side effects, religious belief, ignorance and other myths surrounding the use of contraceptives had contributed to this. The main objective of the study was to find out if the reported side effects of hormonal contraceptives by women of reproductive age in Enugu, South Eastern Nigeria, are truth or myth. It was a combination of prospective and retrospective study with interviewer administered questionnaire to assess socio-demographic data, reasons why some women were not using hormonal contraceptives, side effects and benefits of hormonal contraceptives. From the 410 respondents, the study showed that 232 respondents (56.6%, X2=7.686) of respondents used hormonal contraceptive which was significant (p<0.05). 178respondents (43.4%) respondents did not use hormonal contraception. 76.0% of the hormonal contraceptives users had side effects while 24.0% did not. Irregular menses (44.4%) was the commonest side effect.130 respondents (73.0%) gave reasons such as religious belief, ignorance, fear of side effects etc as preventing factors to the use of contraceptives. The study showed that 69.8% of users were not discouraged by side effects and 81.1% agreed to recommend it to their friends and family relatives because of its numerous benefits. While it was true from the study that hormonal contraceptives was associated with some side effects of which some disappeared without intervention within 3-5 months of use (35.1%), and others were taken care of through medical interventions, some myths(religious belief, ignorance, husband approval, etc) were also limitations against hormonal contraceptives use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
据报道,在埃努古选定的医院育龄妇女激素避孕的副作用:真相或神话
许多意外怀孕及其相关并发症是由于一些育龄妇女拒绝使用避孕药具,特别是在我们的环境中使用激素避孕药具。对副作用的恐惧、宗教信仰、对使用避孕药具的无知和其他误解都是造成这种情况的原因。这项研究的主要目的是找出报道的尼日利亚东南部埃努古育龄妇女使用激素避孕药的副作用是真的还是假的。该研究采用前瞻性和回顾性研究相结合的方法,通过问卷调查来评估社会人口统计数据、一些妇女不使用激素避孕药的原因、激素避孕药的副作用和益处。在410名被调查者中,研究显示232名(56.6%,X2=7.686)的被调查者使用激素避孕药,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。178名(43.4%)受访者未使用激素避孕。激素避孕药使用者中76.0%出现副作用,24.0%无副作用。最常见的副作用是月经不调(44.4%)。130名(73.0%)受访者认为宗教信仰、无知、害怕副作用等是避孕措施的预防因素。研究表明,69.8%的使用者并没有因为副作用而气馁,81.1%的人同意向他们的朋友和家人推荐它,因为它有很多好处。虽然从研究来看,激素避孕药确实与一些副作用有关,其中一些副作用在使用3-5个月内无需干预就消失了(35.1%),其他副作用通过医疗干预得到了解决,但一些神话(宗教信仰、无知、丈夫批准等)也限制了激素避孕药的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parotid Abscess In Young Adult: Case Report Space Based Application For The Inventory, Distribution And Analysis Of Healthcare Facilities In Nasarawa State, Nigeria The Correlation Of Medication Adherence In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes And The Incident Of Hypertension In Primary Health Care Setting Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour (GIST) of Duodeno-Jejunal (DJ) Flexure with Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Rare Case Report A Retrospective Study Of 20 Cases Of Uterine Sarcoma In A Single Institute Over 10 Year Period
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1