A New HRCT Score for Diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia: A Single-Center Study with 1153 Suspected COVID-19 Patients in the Emergency Department

Soccorsa Sofia, Giacomo Filonzi, Leonardo Catalano, Roberta Mattioli, Laura Marinelli, Elena Siopis, Laura Colì, Violante Mulas, Davide Allegri, Carlotta Rotini, Beatrice Scala, Alessio Bertini, Michele Imbriani, Michele Domenico Spampinato, Paolo Orlandi
{"title":"A New HRCT Score for Diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia: A Single-Center Study with 1153 Suspected COVID-19 Patients in the Emergency Department","authors":"Soccorsa Sofia, Giacomo Filonzi, Leonardo Catalano, Roberta Mattioli, Laura Marinelli, Elena Siopis, Laura Colì, Violante Mulas, Davide Allegri, Carlotta Rotini, Beatrice Scala, Alessio Bertini, Michele Imbriani, Michele Domenico Spampinato, Paolo Orlandi","doi":"10.3390/ijtm3040028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is affecting millions of people worldwide. Chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is commonly used as a diagnostic test for suspected COVID-19; however, despite numerous attempts, there is no single scoring system that is widely accepted and used in clinical practice to estimate the probability of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. The aim of this single-center retrospective study is to develop a radiological score to predict the probability of COVID-19 with HRCT. Patients admitted to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 who underwent both HRCT and RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swab to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection between 1 March and 30 April 2020 were included. A multivariable regression analysis was conducted to identify all HRCT signs independently associated with a positive RT-PCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 and build the HRCT score. A total of 1153 patients were enrolled in this study. The number of segments with ground glass opacities (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11–1.26), number of segments with linear opacities (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05–1.42), crazy paving patterns (OR 6, 95% CI 3.79–9.76), and vascular ectasia in each segment (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.1.5–5.8) were included in the score. The HRCT score showed high discriminatory power (area under the ROC curve of 0.8267 [95% CI 0.8–0.85]) with 72.2% sensitivity, 86.6% specificity, 78% PPV, and 83% NPV for its best cut-off. In summary, the HRCT score has good diagnostic and discriminatory accuracy for COVID-19 and is easy and quick to perform.","PeriodicalId":43005,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Translational Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtm3040028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is affecting millions of people worldwide. Chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is commonly used as a diagnostic test for suspected COVID-19; however, despite numerous attempts, there is no single scoring system that is widely accepted and used in clinical practice to estimate the probability of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. The aim of this single-center retrospective study is to develop a radiological score to predict the probability of COVID-19 with HRCT. Patients admitted to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 who underwent both HRCT and RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swab to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection between 1 March and 30 April 2020 were included. A multivariable regression analysis was conducted to identify all HRCT signs independently associated with a positive RT-PCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 and build the HRCT score. A total of 1153 patients were enrolled in this study. The number of segments with ground glass opacities (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11–1.26), number of segments with linear opacities (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05–1.42), crazy paving patterns (OR 6, 95% CI 3.79–9.76), and vascular ectasia in each segment (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.1.5–5.8) were included in the score. The HRCT score showed high discriminatory power (area under the ROC curve of 0.8267 [95% CI 0.8–0.85]) with 72.2% sensitivity, 86.6% specificity, 78% PPV, and 83% NPV for its best cut-off. In summary, the HRCT score has good diagnostic and discriminatory accuracy for COVID-19 and is easy and quick to perform.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断SARS-CoV-2肺炎的新HRCT评分:急诊1153例疑似COVID-19患者的单中心研究
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行正在影响全球数百万人。胸部高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)通常被用作疑似COVID-19的诊断测试;然而,尽管进行了多次尝试,但没有一种被广泛接受并用于临床实践的单一评分系统来估计SARS-CoV-2肺炎的概率。本单中心回顾性研究的目的是建立影像学评分,以HRCT预测COVID-19的可能性。纳入了在2020年3月1日至4月30日期间对鼻咽拭子进行HRCT和RT-PCR检测以检测SARS-CoV-2感染的急诊就诊患者。进行多变量回归分析,以确定与SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR阳性独立相关的所有HRCT体征,并建立HRCT评分。本研究共纳入1153例患者。毛玻璃混浊的节段数(OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.26)、线状混浊的节段数(OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.42)、疯狂铺砌模式(OR 6, 95% CI 3.79-9.76)和各节段血管扩张(OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.1.5-5.8)被纳入评分。HRCT评分具有较高的区分力(ROC曲线下面积为0.8267 [95% CI 0.8-0.85]),其最佳分界点灵敏度为72.2%,特异性为86.6%,PPV为78%,NPV为83%。综上所述,HRCT评分对COVID-19具有良好的诊断和鉴别准确性,且操作简便快捷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Translational Medicine
Journal of International Translational Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
317
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of International Translational Medicine (JITM, ISSN 2227-6394), founded in 2012, is an English academic journal published by Journal of International Translational Medicine Co., Ltd and sponsored by International Fderation of Translational Medicine. JITM is an open access journal freely serving to submit, review, publish, read and download full text and quote. JITM is a quarterly publication with the first issue published in March, 2013, and all articles published in English are compiled and edited by professional graphic designers according to the international compiling and editing standard. All members of the JITM Editorial Board are the famous international specialists in the field of translational medicine who come from twenty different countries and areas such as USA, Britain, France, Germany and so on.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Prognostic and Predictive Roles of Ki-67 in Endometrial Cancer A Review Concerning the Use of Etravirine and Darunavir in Translational Medicine Common Variable Immunodeficiency and Selective IgA Deficiency: Focus on Autoimmune Manifestations and Their Pathogenesis Primary Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma of the Parotid Gland in 32-Year-Old Male, a Case Report Mentha longifolia L. Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Cell Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis via Caspase Regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1