Paleo sea-level indicators and proxies from Greenland in the GAPSLIP database and comparison with modelled sea level from the PaleoMIST ice-sheet reconstruction

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q1 GEOLOGY Geus Bulletin Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.34194/geusb.v53.8355
Evan J Gowan
{"title":"Paleo sea-level indicators and proxies from Greenland in the GAPSLIP database and comparison with modelled sea level from the PaleoMIST ice-sheet reconstruction","authors":"Evan J Gowan","doi":"10.34194/geusb.v53.8355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most common ways to assess ice-sheet reconstructions of the past is to evaluate how they impact changes in sea level through glacial isostatic adjustment. PaleoMIST 1.0, a preliminary reconstruction of topography and ice sheets during the past 80 000 years, was created without a rigorous comparison with past sea-level indicators and proxies in Greenland. The basal shear stress values for the Greenland ice sheet were deduced from the present day ice-sheet configuration, which were used for the entire 80 000 years without modification. The margin chronology was based on previous reconstructions and interpolation between them. As a result, it was not known if the Greenland component was representative of its ice-sheet history. In this study, I compile sea–level proxy data into the Global Archive of Paleo Sea Level Indicators and Proxies (GAPSLIP) database and use them to evaluate the PaleoMIST 1.0 reconstruction. The Last Glacial Maximum (c.20 000 years before present) contribution to sea level in PaleoMIST 1.0 is about 3.5 m, intermediate of other reconstructions of the Greenland ice sheet. The results of the data-model comparison show that PaleoMIST requires a larger pre-Holocene ice volume than it currently has to match the sea-level highstands observed around Greenland, especially in southern Greenland. Some of this mismatch is likely because of the crude 2500 year time step used in the margin reconstruction and the limited Last Glacial Maximum extent. Much of the mismatch can also be mitigated if different Earth model structures, particularly a thinner lithosphere, are assumed. Additional ice in Greenland would contribute to increasing the 3–5 m mismatch between the modelled far-field sea level at the Last Glacial Maximum and proxies in PaleoMIST 1.0.","PeriodicalId":48475,"journal":{"name":"Geus Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geus Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34194/geusb.v53.8355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most common ways to assess ice-sheet reconstructions of the past is to evaluate how they impact changes in sea level through glacial isostatic adjustment. PaleoMIST 1.0, a preliminary reconstruction of topography and ice sheets during the past 80 000 years, was created without a rigorous comparison with past sea-level indicators and proxies in Greenland. The basal shear stress values for the Greenland ice sheet were deduced from the present day ice-sheet configuration, which were used for the entire 80 000 years without modification. The margin chronology was based on previous reconstructions and interpolation between them. As a result, it was not known if the Greenland component was representative of its ice-sheet history. In this study, I compile sea–level proxy data into the Global Archive of Paleo Sea Level Indicators and Proxies (GAPSLIP) database and use them to evaluate the PaleoMIST 1.0 reconstruction. The Last Glacial Maximum (c.20 000 years before present) contribution to sea level in PaleoMIST 1.0 is about 3.5 m, intermediate of other reconstructions of the Greenland ice sheet. The results of the data-model comparison show that PaleoMIST requires a larger pre-Holocene ice volume than it currently has to match the sea-level highstands observed around Greenland, especially in southern Greenland. Some of this mismatch is likely because of the crude 2500 year time step used in the margin reconstruction and the limited Last Glacial Maximum extent. Much of the mismatch can also be mitigated if different Earth model structures, particularly a thinner lithosphere, are assumed. Additional ice in Greenland would contribute to increasing the 3–5 m mismatch between the modelled far-field sea level at the Last Glacial Maximum and proxies in PaleoMIST 1.0.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GAPSLIP数据库中格陵兰岛的古海平面指标和代用品,以及与PaleoMIST冰盖重建的模拟海平面的比较
评估过去冰盖重建的最常见方法之一是评估它们如何通过冰川均衡调整影响海平面的变化。PaleoMIST 1.0是对过去8万年的地形和冰盖的初步重建,它没有与格陵兰岛过去的海平面指标和代用物进行严格的比较。格陵兰冰原的基底剪应力值是根据现在的冰原结构推导出来的,在整个8万年的时间里都没有经过修改。边缘年表是基于先前的重建和它们之间的插值。因此,人们不知道格陵兰的组成部分是否代表了它的冰盖历史。本研究将全球古海平面指标与代理档案(GAPSLIP)数据库中的海平面代理数据编入全球古海平面指标与代理档案,并利用这些数据对palomist 1.0重建结果进行评价。末次冰期极大期(距今约2万年)在PaleoMIST 1.0中对海平面的贡献约为3.5 m,处于格陵兰冰盖其他重建的中间位置。数据模型比较的结果表明,与目前相比,PaleoMIST需要更大的全新世前冰量来匹配格陵兰岛周围观测到的海平面高度,特别是在格陵兰岛南部。这种不匹配的部分原因可能是由于在边缘重建中使用了粗糙的2500年时间步长和有限的末次冰期最大值。如果假设不同的地球模型结构,特别是更薄的岩石圈,这种不匹配也可以得到缓解。格陵兰岛的额外冰将导致末次盛冰期模拟的远场海平面与PaleoMIST 1.0代数据之间3-5米的不匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geus Bulletin
Geus Bulletin GEOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
17.60%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
A new digital database of Ellen Louise Mertz’s 1924 ‘Overview of late- and postglacial elevation changes in Denmark’ Quantifying seabed geodiversity of the Archipelago Sea, Baltic Sea, Finland Beach-ridge formation as a possible indicator for an open Limfjord – North Sea connection Petrology of the Skaergaard Layered Series Stratigraphy of the Upper Jurassic to lowermost Cretaceous in the Rødryggen-1 and Brorson Halvø-1 boreholes, Wollaston Forland, North-East Greenland 
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1