Factors that Influence People’s Beliefs About Men’s and Women’s Jealousy Responses

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Evolutionary Psychological Science Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1007/s40806-023-00379-8
Mons Bendixen, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair
{"title":"Factors that Influence People’s Beliefs About Men’s and Women’s Jealousy Responses","authors":"Mons Bendixen, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair","doi":"10.1007/s40806-023-00379-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examines what beliefs people hold about other men’s and women’s reaction to infidelity and how related these beliefs are to one’s own jealousy response and to various socio-cultural influences. This novel approach was examined in a Facebook snowball sample ( N = 1213) who responded to three infidelity scenarios regarding what aspect of infidelity (emotional or sexual) they believed would make men and women more jealous and then what aspect would make themselves more jealous. The results suggest that both men and women believed men would be more upset by the sexual aspect of infidelity and that women would be more upset by the emotional aspect (i.e., falling in love). Own jealousy responses in men and women were strongly associated with beliefs about same-sex responses to infidelity and showed moderate association with beliefs about opposite-sex responses. Self-reported perceptions of cues to infidelity and knowledge from various sources about what (1) may be cues to infidelity and (2) may be typical reactions to infidelity were unrelated to beliefs about men’s and women’s jealousy responses and to own jealousy responses. We discuss whether beliefs about men’s and women’s jealousy responses may be culturally transmitted or more likely involve a dual model consisting of (a) reflection of own jealousy responses with (b) some cross-sex insights into jealousy reactions in men and women. The findings suggest that there may be evolved psychological adaptations for jealousy beliefs that extend to others of same and opposite sex.","PeriodicalId":52399,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Psychological Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-023-00379-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study examines what beliefs people hold about other men’s and women’s reaction to infidelity and how related these beliefs are to one’s own jealousy response and to various socio-cultural influences. This novel approach was examined in a Facebook snowball sample ( N = 1213) who responded to three infidelity scenarios regarding what aspect of infidelity (emotional or sexual) they believed would make men and women more jealous and then what aspect would make themselves more jealous. The results suggest that both men and women believed men would be more upset by the sexual aspect of infidelity and that women would be more upset by the emotional aspect (i.e., falling in love). Own jealousy responses in men and women were strongly associated with beliefs about same-sex responses to infidelity and showed moderate association with beliefs about opposite-sex responses. Self-reported perceptions of cues to infidelity and knowledge from various sources about what (1) may be cues to infidelity and (2) may be typical reactions to infidelity were unrelated to beliefs about men’s and women’s jealousy responses and to own jealousy responses. We discuss whether beliefs about men’s and women’s jealousy responses may be culturally transmitted or more likely involve a dual model consisting of (a) reflection of own jealousy responses with (b) some cross-sex insights into jealousy reactions in men and women. The findings suggest that there may be evolved psychological adaptations for jealousy beliefs that extend to others of same and opposite sex.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响人们对男女嫉妒反应看法的因素
摘要:本研究考察了人们对其他男性和女性对不忠的反应的看法,以及这些看法与自己的嫉妒反应和各种社会文化影响的关系。这种新颖的方法在Facebook雪球样本(N = 1213)中进行了检验,他们对三种不忠场景做出了回应,即他们认为不忠的哪一方面(情感或性)会让男人和女人更嫉妒,以及哪一方面会让他们自己更嫉妒。研究结果表明,男性和女性都认为,男性会对不忠的性方面感到更不安,而女性会对不忠的情感方面(即坠入爱河)感到更不安。男性和女性的嫉妒反应与同性对不忠的反应强烈相关,与异性对不忠的反应适度相关。自我报告对不忠线索的感知,以及从各种来源获得的关于(1)可能是不忠线索和(2)可能是不忠典型反应的知识,与男性和女性的嫉妒反应以及自己的嫉妒反应的信念无关。我们讨论了关于男性和女性嫉妒反应的信念是否可能是文化传播的,或者更可能涉及到一个双重模型,包括(a)对自己嫉妒反应的反映和(b)对男性和女性嫉妒反应的一些跨性别见解。研究结果表明,可能存在一种进化的心理适应,这种心理适应可以延伸到同性和异性身上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolutionary Psychological Science
Evolutionary Psychological Science Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Psychological Science is an international, interdisciplinary journal that publishes empirical research, theoretical contributions, literature reviews, and commentaries addressing human evolved psychology and behavior. The Journal especially welcomes submissions on non-humans that inform human psychology and behavior, as well as submissions that address clinical implications and applications of an evolutionary perspective. The Journal is informed by all the social and life sciences, including anthropology, biology, criminology, law, medicine, philosophy, political science, and the humanities, and welcomes contributions from these and related fields that contribute to the understanding of human evolved psychology and behavior. Submissions should not exceed 10,000 words, all inclusive.
期刊最新文献
Advancing the Understanding of Phenotypic Mimicry in Men’s Conspicuous Consumption Effects of Accelerated Reproductive Timing in Response to Childhood Adversity on Lifetime Reproductive Success in Modern Environments Women’s Dangerous World Beliefs Predict Biases Against Formidable Men in Legal Domains Distractibility and Impulsivity in ADHD as an Evolutionary Mismatch of High Trait Curiosity Reciprocator-Recipient Asymmetries in Reciprocal Altruism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1