Review: Andrew Feenberg, The Ruthless Critique of Everything Existing

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES Theory Culture & Society Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1177/02632764231207016
Rainer Winter
{"title":"Review: Andrew Feenberg, <i>The Ruthless Critique of Everything Existing</i>","authors":"Rainer Winter","doi":"10.1177/02632764231207016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his new book, The Ruthless Critique of Everything Existing: Nature and Revolution in Marcuse’s Philosophy of Praxis (2023), Andrew Feenberg offers a critical reconstruction of the latter’s oeuvre that brings into focus the topicality and poignancy of his thinking. To this end, he examines significant aspects of Marcuse’s writings in an effort to determine the philosophical foundations and pioneering perspectives of his thought. He contends that Marcuse’s philosophy is now more relevant than ever because it profoundly critiques science and technology and urgently advocates the protection of nature from their destructive consequences. It calls into question the operationality and efficiency of control and monitoring, which are becoming more and more prevalent today. In this regard, as Feenberg argues, Marcuse’s approach is largely predicated on a rehabilitation of the everyday experience inspired by phenomenology, on the principle of potentiality highlighted by Aristotle and Hegel, and on Freud’s conceptions of Eros and the death drive, as well as his theory of the imagination. Marcuse endeavored to ascertain more precisely how existence is historically and socially situated and how a transformative practice may emerge.","PeriodicalId":48276,"journal":{"name":"Theory Culture & Society","volume":"122 40","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764231207016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his new book, The Ruthless Critique of Everything Existing: Nature and Revolution in Marcuse’s Philosophy of Praxis (2023), Andrew Feenberg offers a critical reconstruction of the latter’s oeuvre that brings into focus the topicality and poignancy of his thinking. To this end, he examines significant aspects of Marcuse’s writings in an effort to determine the philosophical foundations and pioneering perspectives of his thought. He contends that Marcuse’s philosophy is now more relevant than ever because it profoundly critiques science and technology and urgently advocates the protection of nature from their destructive consequences. It calls into question the operationality and efficiency of control and monitoring, which are becoming more and more prevalent today. In this regard, as Feenberg argues, Marcuse’s approach is largely predicated on a rehabilitation of the everyday experience inspired by phenomenology, on the principle of potentiality highlighted by Aristotle and Hegel, and on Freud’s conceptions of Eros and the death drive, as well as his theory of the imagination. Marcuse endeavored to ascertain more precisely how existence is historically and socially situated and how a transformative practice may emerge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:安德鲁·芬伯格《对一切现存事物的无情批判》
安德鲁·芬伯格在他的新书《对一切现存事物的无情批判:马尔库塞实践哲学中的自然与革命》(2023)中,对后者的作品进行了批判性的重构,将其思想的话题性和辛痛性集中在了一起。为此,他考察了马尔库塞著作的重要方面,努力确定其思想的哲学基础和开创性观点。他认为,马尔库塞的哲学现在比以往任何时候都更有意义,因为它深刻地批评了科学和技术,并迫切主张保护自然免受其破坏性后果的影响。它使人们对管制和监测的可操作性和效率产生疑问,而管制和监测在今天正变得越来越普遍。在这方面,正如芬伯格所认为的那样,马尔库塞的方法在很大程度上是基于现象学启发的日常经验的恢复,基于亚里士多德和黑格尔强调的潜在性原则,基于弗洛伊德的厄洛斯和死亡驱动的概念,以及他的想象理论。马尔库塞试图更精确地确定存在是如何在历史和社会上定位的,以及变革实践是如何出现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Theory, Culture & Society is a highly ranked, high impact factor, rigorously peer reviewed journal that publishes original research and review articles in the social and cultural sciences. Launched in 1982 to cater for the resurgence of interest in culture within contemporary social science, Theory, Culture & Society provides a forum for articles which theorize the relationship between culture and society. Theory, Culture & Society is at the cutting edge of recent developments in social and cultural theory. The journal has helped to break down some of the disciplinary barriers between the humanities and the social sciences by opening up a wide range of new questions in cultural theory.
期刊最新文献
Latour and the Question of Politics: A Constitutional Reading The Land of the Moderns: The Sense of Latour’s Pragmatism With and after the Inquiry: How Do We Pragmatically Move from the Moderns to the Contemporaries? Bruno Latour and Religion: A Strange Parishioner Artificial Intelligence and the Production of Judicial Truth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1