Women of the Empire at Ajmer's Dargah: Negotiating Sacred and Civic at a Prominent Sufi Pilgrimage Site, 1900–1920

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY Gender and History Pub Date : 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1111/1468-0424.12711
Aishani Gupta
{"title":"Women of the Empire at Ajmer's <i>Dargah</i>: Negotiating Sacred and Civic at a Prominent Sufi Pilgrimage Site, 1900–1920","authors":"Aishani Gupta","doi":"10.1111/1468-0424.12711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines the experiences of four colonial and imperial women at the Sufi tomb complex of Muin al‐Din Chishti (d.1236 CE) in Ajmer during the latter years of British Raj in India. It specifically looks at the ways in which pre‐modern sacred sites and their male custodians were implicated in various municipal and legal apparatuses of the early twentieth century through petitions, complaints and patronage of women as pilgrims, visitors or family members. We first look at the complaints of a courtesan from Lucknow, who petitioned the British Government to claim maintenance from the Sajjada‐Nashin (the biological descent of the Sufi saint buried there). Then we move on to Muslim lady who complained to the colonial officials about being tortured and ill treated by her Sufi in‐laws. The third incident pertains to the wife of the British Chief Commissioner of Ajmer, whose molestation by Khadims (keepers of the shrine) was deftly brushed under the carpet by the local administration. The fourth is Queen‐Empress Mary herself, who granted royal patronage to the shrine by donating money which was then used to build an ablution tank and called the Victoria Tank. Tracing these fragmentary stories of their visits, this article argues that colonial and imperial women negotiated parallel forms of spiritual and political authorities at sacred spaces in order to fulfil their personal and public obligations. Their encounters with the bustling burial complex, its keepers and administrators also urge us to ponder on broader issues of gender, sexuality and race as they played out in such significant nodes across colonial South Asia.","PeriodicalId":46382,"journal":{"name":"Gender and History","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.12711","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the experiences of four colonial and imperial women at the Sufi tomb complex of Muin al‐Din Chishti (d.1236 CE) in Ajmer during the latter years of British Raj in India. It specifically looks at the ways in which pre‐modern sacred sites and their male custodians were implicated in various municipal and legal apparatuses of the early twentieth century through petitions, complaints and patronage of women as pilgrims, visitors or family members. We first look at the complaints of a courtesan from Lucknow, who petitioned the British Government to claim maintenance from the Sajjada‐Nashin (the biological descent of the Sufi saint buried there). Then we move on to Muslim lady who complained to the colonial officials about being tortured and ill treated by her Sufi in‐laws. The third incident pertains to the wife of the British Chief Commissioner of Ajmer, whose molestation by Khadims (keepers of the shrine) was deftly brushed under the carpet by the local administration. The fourth is Queen‐Empress Mary herself, who granted royal patronage to the shrine by donating money which was then used to build an ablution tank and called the Victoria Tank. Tracing these fragmentary stories of their visits, this article argues that colonial and imperial women negotiated parallel forms of spiritual and political authorities at sacred spaces in order to fulfil their personal and public obligations. Their encounters with the bustling burial complex, its keepers and administrators also urge us to ponder on broader issues of gender, sexuality and race as they played out in such significant nodes across colonial South Asia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帝国的妇女在Ajmer's Dargah:在一个著名的苏菲朝圣地谈判神圣和公民,1900-1920
摘要本文考察了1236年Muin al - Din Chishti苏非墓群中四位殖民和帝国女性的经历在英国统治印度的最后几年里,他在阿杰默尔。它特别关注了前现代的圣地及其男性监护人是如何通过请愿、投诉和妇女作为朝圣者、游客或家庭成员的赞助,与20世纪早期的各种市政和法律机构有牵连的。我们首先来看一位来自勒克瑙的妓女的控诉,她向英国政府请愿,要求Sajjada - Nashin(埋葬在那里的苏菲派圣人的生物后裔)提供赡养费。然后我们转到一位穆斯林女士,她向殖民官员抱怨被她的苏菲派姻亲折磨和虐待。第三件事与英国驻阿杰梅尔首席专员的妻子有关,当地政府巧妙地掩盖了Khadims(神庙看守人)对她的性骚扰。第四位是玛丽皇后本人,她通过捐款来授予皇室对神社的赞助,然后用来建造一个名为维多利亚坦克的沐浴池。通过追踪这些零碎的访问故事,本文认为,殖民地和帝国的女性在神圣的空间中谈判了平行的精神和政治权威形式,以履行她们的个人和公共义务。他们与熙熙攘攘的墓葬群、墓葬的看守人和管理者的相遇,也促使我们思考性别、性取向和种族等更广泛的问题,因为他们在南亚殖民地的这些重要节点上发挥了作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gender and History
Gender and History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Gender & History is now established as the major international journal for research and writing on the history of femininity and masculinity and of gender relations. Spanning epochs and continents, Gender & History examines changing conceptions of gender, and maps the dialogue between femininities, masculinities and their historical contexts. The journal publishes rigorous and readable articles both on particular episodes in gender history and on broader methodological questions which have ramifications for the discipline as a whole.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Engendering carcerality: An introduction ‘Good fortune in the camps never lasted’: Gendered experience of carceral labour in the Soviet Union, 1930–1953 ‘No sword could ever pierce my heart more than when I must miss my child’: Power dynamics, agency and motherhood in the prison of ‘s-Hertogenbosch 1820–1880 The other women's rights movement: ‘Streetwalkers’, habeas corpus and anticarceral activism in New York City, 1830–1860
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1