WHITE HOUSE AND UNITED STATES CAPITOL: BATTLE FOR THE SUPREME COURT (SECOND HALF OF THE 20TH CENTURY)

A. I. Makurin
{"title":"WHITE HOUSE AND UNITED STATES CAPITOL: BATTLE FOR THE SUPREME COURT (SECOND HALF OF THE 20TH CENTURY)","authors":"A. I. Makurin","doi":"10.17072/2219-3111-2023-2-84-95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. Constitution requires the President to submit Supreme Court nominees to the Senate for its advice and consent. The appointment of a Supreme Court Justice is an event of major significance in American politics. Since the early 20th century, Presidents have submitted 62 nominations for the Court, including those for the post of Chief Justice. Of this total, 55 were confirmed (seven declined to serve). The article dissects the crucial constitutional disputes between the executive and legislative branches of government from the Eisenhower administration to the end of the Clinton administration, and examines the day-to-day working relations between the President and Congress, which go beyond the traditional discussions of Supreme Court decisions. The article analyzes the conflicts between the President and Congress in the field of shared power – nomination and confirmation of the Supreme Court Justices in the Senate. The research is based on historical and statistical data on the Supreme Court: its institutional development; decision trends; background, nomination; its relations with public, governmental, and other judicial bodies; and its influence. A special place in the article is given to the analysis of the policies of the Nixon, Reagan and Clinton administrations.","PeriodicalId":41257,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2023-2-84-95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The U.S. Constitution requires the President to submit Supreme Court nominees to the Senate for its advice and consent. The appointment of a Supreme Court Justice is an event of major significance in American politics. Since the early 20th century, Presidents have submitted 62 nominations for the Court, including those for the post of Chief Justice. Of this total, 55 were confirmed (seven declined to serve). The article dissects the crucial constitutional disputes between the executive and legislative branches of government from the Eisenhower administration to the end of the Clinton administration, and examines the day-to-day working relations between the President and Congress, which go beyond the traditional discussions of Supreme Court decisions. The article analyzes the conflicts between the President and Congress in the field of shared power – nomination and confirmation of the Supreme Court Justices in the Senate. The research is based on historical and statistical data on the Supreme Court: its institutional development; decision trends; background, nomination; its relations with public, governmental, and other judicial bodies; and its influence. A special place in the article is given to the analysis of the policies of the Nixon, Reagan and Clinton administrations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白宫与美国国会大厦:最高法院之争(20世纪下半叶)
美国宪法要求总统将最高法院提名人提交参议院,征求参议院的意见和同意。最高法院大法官的任命是美国政治中具有重大意义的事件。自20世纪初以来,总统已经为最高法院提交了62份提名,包括首席大法官的提名。其中55人得到确认(7人拒绝服役)。本文剖析了从艾森豪威尔政府到克林顿政府末期政府行政和立法部门之间的重要宪法争议,并考察了总统和国会之间的日常工作关系,这些关系超出了最高法院裁决的传统讨论。本文分析了总统和国会在权力共享领域的冲突——参议院最高法院大法官的提名和确认。该研究基于最高法院的历史和统计数据:其制度发展;决定趋势;背景,提名;与公众、政府和其他司法机构的关系;以及它的影响。本文特别分析了尼克松、里根和克林顿政府的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
«СОЦИАЛДЫК ПАТОЛОГИЯ» ТҮШҮНҮГҮНҮН ЖАНА ФОРМАЛАРЫНЫН ИЗИЛДЕНИШИ ААЛАМДАШУУ ШАРТЫНДА КЫРГЫЗСТАНДЫКТАРДЫН ЖАРАНДЫК ИДЕНТТҮҮЛҮГҮ: УЧУРДАГЫ АБАЛЫ ЖАНА БАГЫТТАРЫ КЫРГЫЗСТАНДАГЫ ОРУС ЧИРКӨӨСҮНҮН ТАРЫХЫ ЖАНА БҮГҮНКҮ КҮНДӨГҮ АБАЛЫ (АКСЫ РАЙОНУНУН ЖЕРГЕ-ТАЛ АЙЫЛЫНЫН МИСАЛЫНДА) ОТРАЖЕНИЕ ИСТОРИИ ХЛОПКОВОДСТВА В АРХИВАХ ТОРГОВЫХ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЙ ТУРКЕСТАНСКОГО КРАЯ (НА ПРИМЕРЕ КОЛОНИАЛЬНОГО ПЕРИОДА) ЭГЕМЕНДҮҮЛҮК ЖЫЛДАРЫНДА КЫРГЫЗСТАНДЫН «ЛЕГЕНДАРЛУУ» ПАРЛАМЕНТИНИН – ЖОГОРКУ КЕҢЕШИНИН КАЛЫПТАНЫШЫ ЖАНА АНЫН МАМЛЕКЕТТИК-УКУКТУК РОЛУ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1