Prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria causing pyogenic infections at a tertiary care hospital in Haryana

LeimapokpamSumitra Devi, KeithellakpamDibiya Devi, Manisha Khandait, Mukesh Sharma, Moumita Sardar, Ashima Singh, Rituparna Saha
{"title":"Prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria causing pyogenic infections at a tertiary care hospital in Haryana","authors":"LeimapokpamSumitra Devi, KeithellakpamDibiya Devi, Manisha Khandait, Mukesh Sharma, Moumita Sardar, Ashima Singh, Rituparna Saha","doi":"10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_66_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The growing occurrence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, especially those resistant to multiple drugs found in pyogenic infections, presents considerable challenges in effectively managing and curing these infections. Objective: This current research aimed to determine the prevalence of Gram-negative bacteria with multidrug resistance in cases of pyogenic infections treated at a tertiary care hospital located in Haryana, India. Materials and Methods: An observational cross-sectional investigation was conducted over 8 months, from June 2022 to January 2023, at a tertiary care hospital located in Haryana, India. Throughout the study, 376 samples of pus and wound swabs were gathered from patients visiting the outpatient and inpatient departments. Subsequently, specimens that exhibited noteworthy aerobic bacterial growth were identified following established bacterial testing procedures, and their antibiotic susceptibility profiles were determined using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Results: Out of the total 376 collected pus and wound swab specimens (n = 376), significant aerobic bacterial growth was observed in 116 cases (30.9%), with 113 instances (97.4%) showing monomicrobial growth and the remaining three cases (2.6%) exhibiting polymicrobial growth. Consequently, a sum of 119 bacterial isolates was obtained, with 70 (58.8%) being Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) and 49 (41.2%) being Gram-positive cocci. Among the GNB isolates, 37 (52.9%) were identified as Gram-negative fermenters (belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family), while the remainder were categorized as Gram-negative non-fermenters. The prevalent isolate was Pseudomonas aeruginosa, accounting for 42.9% of the cases, Escherichia coli at 25.7%, and Enterobacter species at 7.1%. Of these isolates, 31 (44.3%) were multidrug-resistant, 24 were Gram-negative fermenters, and seven were Gram-negative non-fermenters. Approximately three-quarters of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates showed potential for producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases, whereas a quarter exhibited potential for producing carbapenemases. Similarly, a quarter of the Gram-negative non-fermenters were identified as potential carbapenemase producers. Conclusion: The present study underscores the prevalence of multidrug-resistant strains within the pathogens, particularly among Enterobacteriaceae isolates responsible for pyogenic infections. Additionally, these findings will play a pivotal role in shaping a community-specific antimicrobial stewardship initiative, which stands as one of the most essential strategies for addressing the challenge of antimicrobial resistance.","PeriodicalId":52587,"journal":{"name":"MGM Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MGM Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_66_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The growing occurrence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, especially those resistant to multiple drugs found in pyogenic infections, presents considerable challenges in effectively managing and curing these infections. Objective: This current research aimed to determine the prevalence of Gram-negative bacteria with multidrug resistance in cases of pyogenic infections treated at a tertiary care hospital located in Haryana, India. Materials and Methods: An observational cross-sectional investigation was conducted over 8 months, from June 2022 to January 2023, at a tertiary care hospital located in Haryana, India. Throughout the study, 376 samples of pus and wound swabs were gathered from patients visiting the outpatient and inpatient departments. Subsequently, specimens that exhibited noteworthy aerobic bacterial growth were identified following established bacterial testing procedures, and their antibiotic susceptibility profiles were determined using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Results: Out of the total 376 collected pus and wound swab specimens (n = 376), significant aerobic bacterial growth was observed in 116 cases (30.9%), with 113 instances (97.4%) showing monomicrobial growth and the remaining three cases (2.6%) exhibiting polymicrobial growth. Consequently, a sum of 119 bacterial isolates was obtained, with 70 (58.8%) being Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) and 49 (41.2%) being Gram-positive cocci. Among the GNB isolates, 37 (52.9%) were identified as Gram-negative fermenters (belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family), while the remainder were categorized as Gram-negative non-fermenters. The prevalent isolate was Pseudomonas aeruginosa, accounting for 42.9% of the cases, Escherichia coli at 25.7%, and Enterobacter species at 7.1%. Of these isolates, 31 (44.3%) were multidrug-resistant, 24 were Gram-negative fermenters, and seven were Gram-negative non-fermenters. Approximately three-quarters of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates showed potential for producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases, whereas a quarter exhibited potential for producing carbapenemases. Similarly, a quarter of the Gram-negative non-fermenters were identified as potential carbapenemase producers. Conclusion: The present study underscores the prevalence of multidrug-resistant strains within the pathogens, particularly among Enterobacteriaceae isolates responsible for pyogenic infections. Additionally, these findings will play a pivotal role in shaping a community-specific antimicrobial stewardship initiative, which stands as one of the most essential strategies for addressing the challenge of antimicrobial resistance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哈里亚纳邦一家三级保健医院引起化脓性感染的多重耐药革兰氏阴性细菌的流行情况
背景:越来越多的抗生素耐药细菌,特别是在化脓性感染中发现的对多种药物耐药的细菌,对有效管理和治疗这些感染提出了相当大的挑战。目的:本研究旨在确定在印度哈里亚纳邦一家三级保健医院治疗的化脓性感染病例中革兰氏阴性菌耐多药的流行情况。材料和方法:从2022年6月至2023年1月,在印度哈里亚纳邦的一家三级保健医院进行了为期8个月的观察性横断面调查。在整个研究过程中,从访问门诊和住院部门的患者收集了376份脓和伤口拭子样本。随后,根据既定的细菌测试程序鉴定出表现出值得注意的需氧细菌生长的标本,并使用Kirby-Bauer圆盘扩散法确定其抗生素敏感性谱。结果:376例脓液和创面拭子标本(n = 376)中,116例(30.9%)观察到需氧菌显著生长,其中113例(97.4%)为单菌生长,其余3例(2.6%)为多菌生长。结果共分离出119株细菌,其中革兰氏阴性杆菌70株(58.8%),革兰氏阳性球菌49株(41.2%)。其中37株(52.9%)为革兰氏阴性发酵菌(属肠杆菌科),其余为革兰氏阴性非发酵菌。流行的分离菌为铜绿假单胞菌(42.9%)、大肠杆菌(25.7%)和肠杆菌(7.1%)。其中31株(44.3%)耐多药,24株为革兰氏阴性发酵菌,7株为革兰氏阴性非发酵菌。大约四分之三的肠杆菌科分离物显示出产生广谱β-内酰胺酶的潜力,而四分之一显示出产生碳青霉烯酶的潜力。同样,四分之一的革兰氏阴性非发酵菌被确定为潜在的碳青霉烯酶生产者。结论:目前的研究强调了病原体中多药耐药菌株的流行,特别是在导致化脓性感染的肠杆菌科分离株中。此外,这些发现将在形成针对社区的抗菌素管理倡议方面发挥关键作用,这是应对抗菌素耐药性挑战的最重要战略之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of ocular manifestations and related morbidity in severely malnourished children in a tertiary eye care center An evolutionary explanation for increased cesarean section rates Renal-limited systemic lupus erythematosus: Avoiding delay in diagnosis Associative role of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and thymidylate synthase 6bp del gene polymorphism in preterm delivery Clinical presentation and fungal species distribution in otomycosis in a tertiary care hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1