Coping strategies of footballers who have recovered from COVID-19 in five European countries

{"title":"Coping strategies of footballers who have recovered from COVID-19 in five European countries","authors":"","doi":"10.35189/dpeskj.2023.62.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the realm of sports performance, coping skills play a pivotal role, particularly within the stress inducing environment of sports. The aim of this research was to explore differences between football athletes who had tested positive for COVID-19 and athletes who had not contracted the virus in terms of their utilization of coping strategies. Additionally, differences among countries were investigated, in the case of football players who had, at some point, battled COVID-19. A total of 147 (one hundred and forty-seven) male football players from five European countries - Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Romania – took part in this study. To assess coping skills, we employed the Brief COPE questionnaire, which encompassed fourteen coping strategies, grouped into three categories: emotion-oriented coping strategies, problem/task-oriented strategies, and dysfunctional coping strategies. Using the Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner pairwise comparison test, the differences between the five countries were scrutinized, starting from the three dependent variables (the grouped coping strategies). Notably, football athletes from Poland and Romania exhibited a higher frequency of employing emotion-focused coping strategies (during the pandemic). Conversely, athletes from Italy leaned towards employing problem-focused strategies more frequently. No significant differences were observed in terms of dysfunctional coping strategies among football players who had battled COVID-19 across the five countries. We discussed the frequency of using coping strategies among football athletes who reported no infection with the SARS-COV-2 virus (up to the 4th wave of the pandemic) and those who had experienced COVID-19. The findings are of considerable interest to specialists, raising awareness on the coping skills employed by footballers during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":31352,"journal":{"name":"Discobolul Physical Education Sports and Kinetotherapy Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discobolul Physical Education Sports and Kinetotherapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35189/dpeskj.2023.62.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the realm of sports performance, coping skills play a pivotal role, particularly within the stress inducing environment of sports. The aim of this research was to explore differences between football athletes who had tested positive for COVID-19 and athletes who had not contracted the virus in terms of their utilization of coping strategies. Additionally, differences among countries were investigated, in the case of football players who had, at some point, battled COVID-19. A total of 147 (one hundred and forty-seven) male football players from five European countries - Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Romania – took part in this study. To assess coping skills, we employed the Brief COPE questionnaire, which encompassed fourteen coping strategies, grouped into three categories: emotion-oriented coping strategies, problem/task-oriented strategies, and dysfunctional coping strategies. Using the Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner pairwise comparison test, the differences between the five countries were scrutinized, starting from the three dependent variables (the grouped coping strategies). Notably, football athletes from Poland and Romania exhibited a higher frequency of employing emotion-focused coping strategies (during the pandemic). Conversely, athletes from Italy leaned towards employing problem-focused strategies more frequently. No significant differences were observed in terms of dysfunctional coping strategies among football players who had battled COVID-19 across the five countries. We discussed the frequency of using coping strategies among football athletes who reported no infection with the SARS-COV-2 virus (up to the 4th wave of the pandemic) and those who had experienced COVID-19. The findings are of considerable interest to specialists, raising awareness on the coping skills employed by footballers during the pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲五国新冠肺炎康复后足球运动员的应对策略
在运动表现领域,应对技能起着举足轻重的作用,特别是在运动的压力诱导环境中。本研究的目的是探讨COVID-19检测呈阳性的足球运动员和未感染该病毒的运动员在应对策略的使用方面的差异。此外,研究人员还调查了国家之间的差异,比如曾经与COVID-19作过斗争的足球运动员。来自意大利、拉脱维亚、立陶宛、波兰和罗马尼亚五个欧洲国家的147名(147名)男足球运动员参加了这项研究。为了评估应对技能,我们采用了简短的COPE问卷,其中包含14种应对策略,分为三类:情绪导向的应对策略、问题/任务导向的应对策略和功能失调的应对策略。使用Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner两两比较检验,从三个因变量(分组应对策略)开始,仔细检查了五个国家之间的差异。值得注意的是,波兰和罗马尼亚的足球运动员(在大流行期间)更频繁地采用以情绪为中心的应对策略。相反,意大利运动员更倾向于采用以问题为中心的策略。在与COVID-19作斗争的五个国家的足球运动员中,在功能失调的应对策略方面没有观察到显著差异。我们讨论了在报告未感染SARS-COV-2病毒(直到第四波大流行)的足球运动员和经历过COVID-19的足球运动员中使用应对策略的频率。这些发现引起了专家们的极大兴趣,提高了人们对足球运动员在大流行期间所使用的应对技能的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anthropometric measurements and their relationship with technical skills and physical performance in junior basketball players Improving coordination skills in young football players aged 8-10 years DISTINGUISHABLE HARDSHIPS FOR A SAMPLE OF MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS FROM VRANCEA COUNTY Study on the impact of adapted judo practice on individuals with ASD and Down syndrome Effects of kinesiotherapy versus hidrokinetic therapy on the rehabilitation of patients with amputation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1