Diastolic Function Assessment by Echocardiography at Dhulilkhel Hospital

Sanjaya Humagain, Rajendra Prasad Koju
{"title":"Diastolic Function Assessment by Echocardiography at Dhulilkhel Hospital","authors":"Sanjaya Humagain, Rajendra Prasad Koju","doi":"10.3126/jcmsn.v19i2.55326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionDiastolic dysfunction (DD) is understood as impaired Left ventricular relaxation. Echocardiography is the key in diagnosis. In 2016 recommendation by American Society of Echocardiography(ASE) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) was updated. In our country we do not have a general consensus. Diastolic dysfunction is reported on the basis of E/A ratio of mitral flow, that has the chance of missing a lot of patients with pseudo-normalization. This study carried out to look at importance of evaluation of other parameters to diagnose a patient with diastolic dysfunction.Methods: It is a retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study. Echocardiography report from the year 2018 and 2019 was collected from database and the patients with diagnosis of Diastolic dysfunction were selected. Patient profile and the echocardiographic parameter were recorded. Echocardiography was reported according to 2016 ASE and EACVI update.Results: Total of 1982 patients selected for analysis. E/A < 0.8 was seen in 702(35.4%) patients, E/A 0.8- 2.0 was seen in 1136 (57.3%) patients and E/A > 2.0 was found in 144(7.3%) patients. The most common finding being E/e’ 1470 (74.2%) of patients followed by TR velocity > 2.8m/s 1422 (71.7%), Septal e’ velocity < 7 cm/s or Lateral e’ velocity <10 cm/s 1334 (67.3%) and LA area >20 cm2 1286 (64.8%) respectively.Conclusions: Diastolic dysfunction should be evaluated using all the parameters recommended by 2016 ASE andEACVI guideline update. Measurement of only E/A ratio has a chance of missing large number of patient with DD.","PeriodicalId":15436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College of Medical Sciences-nepal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College of Medical Sciences-nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jcmsn.v19i2.55326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionDiastolic dysfunction (DD) is understood as impaired Left ventricular relaxation. Echocardiography is the key in diagnosis. In 2016 recommendation by American Society of Echocardiography(ASE) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) was updated. In our country we do not have a general consensus. Diastolic dysfunction is reported on the basis of E/A ratio of mitral flow, that has the chance of missing a lot of patients with pseudo-normalization. This study carried out to look at importance of evaluation of other parameters to diagnose a patient with diastolic dysfunction.Methods: It is a retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study. Echocardiography report from the year 2018 and 2019 was collected from database and the patients with diagnosis of Diastolic dysfunction were selected. Patient profile and the echocardiographic parameter were recorded. Echocardiography was reported according to 2016 ASE and EACVI update.Results: Total of 1982 patients selected for analysis. E/A < 0.8 was seen in 702(35.4%) patients, E/A 0.8- 2.0 was seen in 1136 (57.3%) patients and E/A > 2.0 was found in 144(7.3%) patients. The most common finding being E/e’ 1470 (74.2%) of patients followed by TR velocity > 2.8m/s 1422 (71.7%), Septal e’ velocity < 7 cm/s or Lateral e’ velocity <10 cm/s 1334 (67.3%) and LA area >20 cm2 1286 (64.8%) respectively.Conclusions: Diastolic dysfunction should be evaluated using all the parameters recommended by 2016 ASE andEACVI guideline update. Measurement of only E/A ratio has a chance of missing large number of patient with DD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dhulilkhel医院超声心动图评价舒张功能
舒张功能障碍(DD)被理解为左心室舒张功能受损。超声心动图是诊断的关键。2016年,美国超声心动图学会(ASE)和欧洲心血管成像协会(EACVI)的建议进行了更新。在我国,我们没有一个普遍的共识。舒张功能不全是根据二尖瓣血流的E/A比值来报道的,这有可能遗漏很多假正常化的患者。本研究旨在探讨其他参数对舒张功能不全患者诊断的重要性。方法:采用回顾性横断面描述性研究。从数据库中收集2018年和2019年的超声心动图报告,选择诊断为舒张功能不全的患者。记录患者概况和超声心动图参数。超声心动图是根据2016年ASE和EACVI更新报告的。结果:共选取1982例患者进行分析。E / & lt;702例(35.4%)患者为0.8,1136例(57.3%)患者为0.8 ~ 2.0,E/A >144例(7.3%)患者中发现2.0。最常见的发现是E/ E ' 1470(74.2%),其次是TR速度>2.8m/s 1422(71.7%),间隔e '速度<横向速度为10cm /s 1334(67.3%),横向面积为20cm /s 1286(64.8%)。结论:舒张功能障碍应使用2016年ASE和deacvi指南更新中推荐的所有参数进行评估。仅测量E/A比值有可能遗漏大量DD患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Parental Satisfaction Regarding Online Education of Their Children During COVID-19 Pandemic Blood Pressure and Hematoma Expansion in Hemorrhagic Stroke Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Lower Calyceal Stones of ≤ 2 cm Potential Nephrotoxic Sequel of the Kidney Following Exposure to Turmeric Extract in Adult Wistar Rats Clinical Psychopathology During Covid-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1