Effect of Short Course Caffeine on Recurrence of Apnea of Prematurity in Preterm Infants Less than 32 Weeks: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Q4 Medicine Journal of Neonatology Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1177/09732179231198302
K. Pradhap, M. Solaiappan, S. Ramya, N. Muthukumaran
{"title":"Effect of Short Course Caffeine on Recurrence of Apnea of Prematurity in Preterm Infants Less than 32 Weeks: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"K. Pradhap, M. Solaiappan, S. Ramya, N. Muthukumaran","doi":"10.1177/09732179231198302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Though caffeine is the preferred drug for apnea of prematurity for decades, the timing of discontinuation of caffeine therapy is still unknown. The proportion of ‘Recurrence of Apnea of Prematurity’(RAP) after stopping caffeine, in the short course group and long course group was compared. Methods Eligible neonates were randomized into two groups: short course group-caffeine was stopped when babies were off respiratory support and apnea free for 7 consecutive days and long course group-stopped at 34 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) if they were off respiratory support and apnea free for 7 consecutive days. Proportion of neonates with RAP in each group was analyzed. Results There were 87 neonates in each group. The proportion of neonates with RAP was [(12.6% vs 4.6%); odds ratio (OR) 3.0 (0.92–9.8) and p = 0.06] not statistically significant between the groups. However, in the subgroup analysis of 26–28-week infants, the incidence of RAP was significantly higher (p = 0.038). Cumulative duration of therapy was less by 13.77 days in short course group babies. The incidence of intermittent hypoxemia was significantly more (p = 0.003) in short course group. The incidence of adverse effects that include feed intolerance, hyperglycemia, tachycardia, osteopenia and EUGR were also significantly more in the long course group. Conclusions There was no statistically significant difference in RAP when caffeine was discontinued earlier when compared to the long course regimen. Larger non-inferiority, multicentric trials are required particularly in extremely preterm infants to make strong recommendations on stopping therapy.","PeriodicalId":16516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neonatology","volume":"34 13","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09732179231198302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Though caffeine is the preferred drug for apnea of prematurity for decades, the timing of discontinuation of caffeine therapy is still unknown. The proportion of ‘Recurrence of Apnea of Prematurity’(RAP) after stopping caffeine, in the short course group and long course group was compared. Methods Eligible neonates were randomized into two groups: short course group-caffeine was stopped when babies were off respiratory support and apnea free for 7 consecutive days and long course group-stopped at 34 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) if they were off respiratory support and apnea free for 7 consecutive days. Proportion of neonates with RAP in each group was analyzed. Results There were 87 neonates in each group. The proportion of neonates with RAP was [(12.6% vs 4.6%); odds ratio (OR) 3.0 (0.92–9.8) and p = 0.06] not statistically significant between the groups. However, in the subgroup analysis of 26–28-week infants, the incidence of RAP was significantly higher (p = 0.038). Cumulative duration of therapy was less by 13.77 days in short course group babies. The incidence of intermittent hypoxemia was significantly more (p = 0.003) in short course group. The incidence of adverse effects that include feed intolerance, hyperglycemia, tachycardia, osteopenia and EUGR were also significantly more in the long course group. Conclusions There was no statistically significant difference in RAP when caffeine was discontinued earlier when compared to the long course regimen. Larger non-inferiority, multicentric trials are required particularly in extremely preterm infants to make strong recommendations on stopping therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
短疗程咖啡因对32周以下早产儿呼吸暂停复发的影响:一项随机对照试验
虽然几十年来咖啡因是治疗早产儿呼吸暂停的首选药物,但停止咖啡因治疗的时间仍不清楚。比较停药后短疗程组和长疗程组“早产儿呼吸暂停复发”(RAP)的比例。方法将符合条件的新生儿随机分为两组:短疗程组在连续7天不使用呼吸支持且无呼吸暂停时停用咖啡因;长疗程组在连续7天不使用呼吸支持且无呼吸暂停时停用咖啡因。分析各组新生儿RAP发生率。结果每组新生儿87例。新生儿RAP比例为(12.6% vs 4.6%);比值比(OR) 3.0 (0.92-9.8), p = 0.06]组间差异无统计学意义。然而,在26 - 28周的婴儿亚组分析中,RAP的发生率明显更高(p = 0.038)。短疗程组累计治疗时间短13.77天。短疗程组间歇性低氧血症发生率显著高于短疗程组(p = 0.003)。不良反应的发生率,包括饲料不耐受,高血糖,心动过速,骨质减少和EUGR在长疗程组也明显更多。结论:与长期治疗方案相比,早期停用咖啡因的RAP无统计学差异。需要更大规模的非劣效性、多中心试验,特别是在极早产儿中,以对停止治疗提出强烈建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neonatology
Journal of Neonatology Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Post-operative Ultrashort Bowel Syndrome in a Term Neonate: One-year Follow-up Silent Struggles Beyond Breath: Decoding Hemostatic Dynamics and Bleeding in Neonates Affected by Perinatal Asphyxia Breast Milk Output and Factors Influencing Sustained Feeding with Mother’s Own Milk in Very Preterm Births: A Prospective Observational Study Assessment of Central Catheter Tip Position in Neonates by Ultrasonography Versus X-ray Kangaroo Mother Care Foundation, India: Champion Organization Focusing on the Essentials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1