Not Equivalent (Yet?): The Current EU Third Country Regime for Credit Institutions and Incoming Changes

IF 2.1 4区 社会学 Q3 BUSINESS European Business Organization Law Review Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1007/s40804-023-00300-7
Jens-Hinrich Binder
{"title":"Not Equivalent (Yet?): The Current EU Third Country Regime for Credit Institutions and Incoming Changes","authors":"Jens-Hinrich Binder","doi":"10.1007/s40804-023-00300-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As part of the European Commission’s ‘Banking Package’, introducing a series of amendments to the key legal sources of EU banking regulation, a comprehensive proposal for the treatment of third country branches of credit institutions (i.e., branches of institutions licensed by non-EU jurisdictions seeking authorisation in an EU Member State) has been presented. If and when ultimately adopted, this new framework will, for the first time, harmonise the applicable authorisation procedures and substantive conditions for authorisation hitherto left exclusively to the discretion of EU Member States. Under the new regime, the equivalence of third country regulatory and supervisory approaches with EU banking regulation will play a role, albeit a limited one. While taking up, and refining, approaches that have been present in a range of Member States for some time already, the new framework will require others to fundamentally change their existing regimes. The new amendments will be of particular relevance for the future regulatory relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union, since a bespoke arrangement for continuing access of UK financial intermediaries to the EU markets has not been achieved, and UK credit institutions wishing to continue to operate within the EU other than through legally separate and independently capitalised subsidiaries have to rely on authorisations as third country branches. Against this backdrop, the present paper presents a functional analysis of the incoming regime in light of experiences made with regard to the existing landscape of diverging national laws.","PeriodicalId":45278,"journal":{"name":"European Business Organization Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Business Organization Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-023-00300-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract As part of the European Commission’s ‘Banking Package’, introducing a series of amendments to the key legal sources of EU banking regulation, a comprehensive proposal for the treatment of third country branches of credit institutions (i.e., branches of institutions licensed by non-EU jurisdictions seeking authorisation in an EU Member State) has been presented. If and when ultimately adopted, this new framework will, for the first time, harmonise the applicable authorisation procedures and substantive conditions for authorisation hitherto left exclusively to the discretion of EU Member States. Under the new regime, the equivalence of third country regulatory and supervisory approaches with EU banking regulation will play a role, albeit a limited one. While taking up, and refining, approaches that have been present in a range of Member States for some time already, the new framework will require others to fundamentally change their existing regimes. The new amendments will be of particular relevance for the future regulatory relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union, since a bespoke arrangement for continuing access of UK financial intermediaries to the EU markets has not been achieved, and UK credit institutions wishing to continue to operate within the EU other than through legally separate and independently capitalised subsidiaries have to rely on authorisations as third country branches. Against this backdrop, the present paper presents a functional analysis of the incoming regime in light of experiences made with regard to the existing landscape of diverging national laws.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不等同(尚未?):当前欧盟第三国信贷机构制度和即将发生的变化
作为欧盟委员会“银行业一揽子计划”的一部分,对欧盟银行业监管的主要法律来源进行了一系列修订,提出了一项关于信贷机构第三国分支机构(即,在欧盟成员国寻求授权的非欧盟司法管辖区许可的机构分支机构)处理的综合建议。如果最终通过,这一新框架将首次协调迄今为止仅由欧盟成员国自行决定的适用授权程序和实质性授权条件。在新制度下,第三国监管和监督方法与欧盟银行业监管的等同将发挥作用,尽管作用有限。在采用和改进一些会员国已经存在了一段时间的办法的同时,新的框架将要求其他国家从根本上改变其现有制度。新的修正案将与英国和欧盟之间未来的监管关系特别相关,因为英国金融中介机构继续进入欧盟市场的定制安排尚未实现,英国信贷机构希望继续在欧盟内运营,而不是通过合法分离和独立资本化的子公司,必须依赖授权作为第三国分支机构。在此背景下,本文件根据各国法律分歧的现状所取得的经验,对即将到来的制度进行功能分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) aims to promote a scholarly debate which critically analyses the whole range of organizations chosen by companies, groups of companies, and state-owned enterprises to pursue their business activities and offer goods and services all over the European Union. At issue are the enactment of corporate laws, the theory of firm, the theory of capital markets and related legal topics.
期刊最新文献
Enterprise Foundations and Faithful Agency as Drivers of Sustainable Long-Termism in Philanthropy Solving Investors’ Problems with Access to Evidence in Damages Litigation: Suggestions for a Future Issuer Liability Regime ESG & Executive Remuneration in Europe Interpretation of the Scope of International Commercial Arbitration Agreements: A Comparison of Swiss and Turkish Case Law Reining in the Behemoths for the Common Good? An Analysis of State Control of State-Owned Enterprises and the Pathway to Better Governance in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1