Qualitative Dermal Exposure Assessment of Laboratory Technicians in Selected Chemical Laboratories in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia

Ayman M. Arfaj, Jose Lauro M. Llamas
{"title":"Qualitative Dermal Exposure Assessment of Laboratory Technicians in Selected Chemical Laboratories in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia","authors":"Ayman M. Arfaj, Jose Lauro M. Llamas","doi":"10.20473/ijosh.v12i2.2023.237-245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The assessment of dermal exposure is a complex task. The most commonly used methods have fundamental problems, and there are large gaps in the documentation and validation of the known assessment methods. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of self-reported skin problems in laboratory technicians. Additionally, to determine if there is an association between self-reported skin problems and work tasks and other exposure-related parameters, we developed a simple qualitative questionnaire that may be used for conducting qualitative dermal exposure assessments. Methods: A well-structured survey questionnaire was developed and 45 laboratory technicians were interviewed while conducting qualitative dermal exposure assessments in three selected laboratories. The sampling technique was a qualitative survey conducted through interviews. The examined variables included skin problems, work characteristics, and chemicals used. Results: This study indicated that 18% of technicians reported having skin problems, most notably inexperienced technicians or technicians with more than 6 years of experience. Skin problems were also identified in technicians who worked between one and eight hours, performed manual operations, and handled solvents. The prevalence of skin problems has also been associated with changing gloves. However, no significant differences were observed between the examined parameters and skin problems (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The prevalence of self-reported skin problems (18%) among laboratory technicians was not high. The prevalence of dry skin was low (11%). A well-structured questionnaire can be used to conduct a qualitative dermal risk assessment. As this was a cross-sectional study with a small sample size, it was not possible to establish a causative effect between exposure to workplace hazards and dermal problems.","PeriodicalId":33133,"journal":{"name":"The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ijosh.v12i2.2023.237-245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The assessment of dermal exposure is a complex task. The most commonly used methods have fundamental problems, and there are large gaps in the documentation and validation of the known assessment methods. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of self-reported skin problems in laboratory technicians. Additionally, to determine if there is an association between self-reported skin problems and work tasks and other exposure-related parameters, we developed a simple qualitative questionnaire that may be used for conducting qualitative dermal exposure assessments. Methods: A well-structured survey questionnaire was developed and 45 laboratory technicians were interviewed while conducting qualitative dermal exposure assessments in three selected laboratories. The sampling technique was a qualitative survey conducted through interviews. The examined variables included skin problems, work characteristics, and chemicals used. Results: This study indicated that 18% of technicians reported having skin problems, most notably inexperienced technicians or technicians with more than 6 years of experience. Skin problems were also identified in technicians who worked between one and eight hours, performed manual operations, and handled solvents. The prevalence of skin problems has also been associated with changing gloves. However, no significant differences were observed between the examined parameters and skin problems (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The prevalence of self-reported skin problems (18%) among laboratory technicians was not high. The prevalence of dry skin was low (11%). A well-structured questionnaire can be used to conduct a qualitative dermal risk assessment. As this was a cross-sectional study with a small sample size, it was not possible to establish a causative effect between exposure to workplace hazards and dermal problems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯东部省选定化学实验室实验室技术人员皮肤暴露定性评估
皮肤暴露的评估是一项复杂的任务。最常用的方法存在根本性的问题,并且在已知评估方法的文档和验证方面存在很大的差距。本研究旨在确定实验室技术人员自我报告的皮肤问题的流行程度。此外,为了确定自我报告的皮肤问题与工作任务和其他暴露相关参数之间是否存在关联,我们开发了一份简单的定性问卷,可用于进行定性皮肤暴露评估。方法:设计了一份结构合理的调查问卷,对45名实验室技术人员进行了访谈,并在三个选定的实验室进行了定性皮肤暴露评估。抽样方法是通过访谈进行的定性调查。检查的变量包括皮肤问题、工作特征和使用的化学物质。结果:本研究表明,18%的技师报告有皮肤问题,最明显的是缺乏经验的技师或有6年以上经验的技师。在工作1到8小时、从事手工操作和处理溶剂的技术人员中也发现了皮肤问题。皮肤问题的流行也与更换手套有关。然而,在检查参数和皮肤问题之间没有观察到显著差异(p >0.05)。结论:实验室技术人员自我报告皮肤问题的患病率(18%)不高。皮肤干燥的患病率很低(11%)。一份结构良好的调查问卷可用于进行定性的皮肤风险评估。由于这是一项小样本量的横断面研究,因此不可能在暴露于工作场所有害物质和皮肤问题之间建立因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Proposed Workstation Design in Laboratory for Musculoskeletal Disorder Complaints The Paradox of Health and Safety Risks: A Disclose of Handling Strategies in Informal Construction Sites in Tanzania Implementation of Occupational Safety and Health Management System in the Education Sector The Effect of Work, Family Conflict, and Work Shifts on the Performance of Midwives with Work Stress as Intervening Variables Work Safety Aspects on the Sea on Small-Scale Fishermen in Jember Regency, Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1