Market Dependence as a Boundary Construction for Work Solidarity with the Solo Self-employed

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Work Employment and Society Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1177/09500170231206083
Isabell Kathrin Stamm, Lena Schürmann, Katharina Scheidgen
{"title":"Market Dependence as a Boundary Construction for Work Solidarity with the Solo Self-employed","authors":"Isabell Kathrin Stamm, Lena Schürmann, Katharina Scheidgen","doi":"10.1177/09500170231206083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As more people work outside standard employment, the foundations of work solidarity are contested. How does work solidarity arise in atypical forms of work that are characterised by flexible, autonomous and self-dependent organisation, such as in solo self-employment? Drawing on a discursive approach to work solidarity, this article emphasises how market dependence can serve as a boundary construction to create work solidarity. Empirically, this study engages in a discourse analysis on Soforthilfe, a policy measure introduced by the German government to financially assist solo self-employed people during the Covid-19 lockdown. In this discourse, market dependence serves to identify this social group’s need (social boundary) and to set out the corresponding policies for financial assistance (substantive boundary). Four solidarity norms – relief, equality, preservation and quasi-equivalence – support this boundary construction. The article contributes to the current discourse on work solidarity by identifying an additional boundary construction.","PeriodicalId":48187,"journal":{"name":"Work Employment and Society","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work Employment and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231206083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As more people work outside standard employment, the foundations of work solidarity are contested. How does work solidarity arise in atypical forms of work that are characterised by flexible, autonomous and self-dependent organisation, such as in solo self-employment? Drawing on a discursive approach to work solidarity, this article emphasises how market dependence can serve as a boundary construction to create work solidarity. Empirically, this study engages in a discourse analysis on Soforthilfe, a policy measure introduced by the German government to financially assist solo self-employed people during the Covid-19 lockdown. In this discourse, market dependence serves to identify this social group’s need (social boundary) and to set out the corresponding policies for financial assistance (substantive boundary). Four solidarity norms – relief, equality, preservation and quasi-equivalence – support this boundary construction. The article contributes to the current discourse on work solidarity by identifying an additional boundary construction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
市场依赖:个体户劳动团结的边界构建
随着越来越多的人在标准职业之外工作,工作团结的基础受到了质疑。在以灵活、自主和自我依赖的组织为特征的非典型工作形式中,例如在个体自营职业中,工作团结是如何产生的?本文利用话语的方法来研究劳动团结,强调市场依赖如何作为一种边界构建来创造劳动团结。从实证角度看,本研究对德国政府在新冠疫情封锁期间为个体经营者提供经济援助的政策措施Soforthilfe进行了话语分析。在这一论述中,市场依赖有助于确定该社会群体的需求(社会边界),并制定相应的财政援助政策(实质性边界)。救济、平等、保护和准等值四种团结规范支撑着这种边界建构。本文通过确定一个额外的边界结构,为当前关于工作团结的论述做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
13.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Work, Employment and Society (WES) is a leading international peer reviewed journal of the British Sociological Association which publishes theoretically informed and original research on the sociology of work. Work, Employment and Society covers all aspects of work, employment and unemployment and their connections with wider social processes and social structures. The journal is sociologically orientated but welcomes contributions from other disciplines which addresses the issues in a way that informs less debated aspects of the journal"s remit, such as unpaid labour and the informal economy.
期刊最新文献
(Doing) Time Is Money: Confinement, Prison Work and the Reproduction of Carceral Capitalism Book Review: Tiziano Bonini and Emiliano Treré, Algorithms of Resistance: The Everyday Fight Against Platform Power Book Review: Sarah Waters, Suicide Voices: Labour Trauma in France Book Review: Pablo Pérez-Ahumada, Building Power to Shape Labor Policy: Unions, Employee Associations, and Reform in Neoliberal Chile Exploring Informal Work: Gaining Legitimation through Nudging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1