György Márkus, 75% mensch: On the occasion of the publication of the English version of How Is Critical Economic Theory Possible?

IF 1 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Thesis Eleven Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1177/07255136231199781
John Grumley
{"title":"György Márkus, 75% mensch: On the occasion of the publication of the English version of <i>How Is Critical Economic Theory Possible?</i>","authors":"John Grumley","doi":"10.1177/07255136231199781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I give an overall interpretation of the development of the Budapest School in Australia as political emigres, who initially worked and wrote in Melbourne and Sydney until the final years when Heller and Feher moved on to New York in the mid-1980s and then back to Budapest in 1993. The translation of How Is Critical Economic Theory Possible? has allowed us to better grasp the motivations and theoretical innovations of the Budapest School, to appreciate their internal disputes and to recognise fundamental continuities and difference in these two key thinkers. This book was a gallant retrieval of democratic potentials in Marx. It excavated Marx’s own appreciation of needs produced by, and critical of, the alienations of the capitalist system. Ultimately, this early work was unable to realise its ambition to educate the diverse progressive movements of the times. I will show later that the retrieval of progressive potentials took a more social democratic form in the work of Maria Márkus on needs as she encountered them later in the Hawke Labor Government of Australia from 1983. Introducing the world media to the Budapest School in The Times Literary Supplement on 15 February 1971, Lukács described Márkus as ‘75% mensch’. When Lukács first met him, George already had his own philosophical interests, which he would bring with him when he became a key figure in ‘the Budapest School’. Márkus had studied in Moscow where he wrote his dissertation on the topic History and Consciousness and met his Polish wife, Maria. George used to modestly say that he was an expert only on the works of Karl Marx. That was despite that he had taught the history of modern philosophy at Eotvös Loránd University to Hungary’s most promising philosophers for a decade and later to philosophy students at Sydney University for the next 20 years. In the early 1970s, George invited Janos Kis and György Bence to work on his next project that would become the Hungarian version of Überhaupt, which was to become How Is Critical Economic Theory Possible? The new English translation published by Brill this year opens this important rethinking of the work of Marx to an international readership.","PeriodicalId":54188,"journal":{"name":"Thesis Eleven","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thesis Eleven","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136231199781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article I give an overall interpretation of the development of the Budapest School in Australia as political emigres, who initially worked and wrote in Melbourne and Sydney until the final years when Heller and Feher moved on to New York in the mid-1980s and then back to Budapest in 1993. The translation of How Is Critical Economic Theory Possible? has allowed us to better grasp the motivations and theoretical innovations of the Budapest School, to appreciate their internal disputes and to recognise fundamental continuities and difference in these two key thinkers. This book was a gallant retrieval of democratic potentials in Marx. It excavated Marx’s own appreciation of needs produced by, and critical of, the alienations of the capitalist system. Ultimately, this early work was unable to realise its ambition to educate the diverse progressive movements of the times. I will show later that the retrieval of progressive potentials took a more social democratic form in the work of Maria Márkus on needs as she encountered them later in the Hawke Labor Government of Australia from 1983. Introducing the world media to the Budapest School in The Times Literary Supplement on 15 February 1971, Lukács described Márkus as ‘75% mensch’. When Lukács first met him, George already had his own philosophical interests, which he would bring with him when he became a key figure in ‘the Budapest School’. Márkus had studied in Moscow where he wrote his dissertation on the topic History and Consciousness and met his Polish wife, Maria. George used to modestly say that he was an expert only on the works of Karl Marx. That was despite that he had taught the history of modern philosophy at Eotvös Loránd University to Hungary’s most promising philosophers for a decade and later to philosophy students at Sydney University for the next 20 years. In the early 1970s, George invited Janos Kis and György Bence to work on his next project that would become the Hungarian version of Überhaupt, which was to become How Is Critical Economic Theory Possible? The new English translation published by Brill this year opens this important rethinking of the work of Marx to an international readership.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
György Márkus, 75% mensch:值此《批判经济理论如何可能?》英文版出版之际。
在这篇文章中,我对作为政治移民的布达佩斯学派在澳大利亚的发展进行了全面的解释,他们最初在墨尔本和悉尼工作和写作,直到20世纪80年代中期海勒和费赫尔搬到纽约,然后在1993年回到布达佩斯的最后几年。《批判经济理论如何可能?》使我们能够更好地掌握布达佩斯学派的动机和理论创新,欣赏他们的内部争论,并认识到这两位关键思想家的基本连续性和差异。这本书是对马克思的民主潜力的一次勇敢的检索。它挖掘了马克思自己对资本主义制度的异化所产生的需求的欣赏,并对其进行了批判。最终,这部早期作品未能实现其教育当时各种进步运动的雄心。我稍后会说明,在Maria Márkus关于需求的工作中,对进步潜力的检索采取了一种更社会民主的形式,因为她后来在1983年澳大利亚的霍克工党政府中遇到了这些需求。1971年2月15日,Lukács在《泰晤士报文学增刊》向世界媒体介绍布达佩斯学派时,将Márkus描述为“75%的人”。当Lukács第一次见到他时,乔治已经有了自己的哲学兴趣,当他成为“布达佩斯学派”的关键人物时,他将带着这些兴趣。Márkus曾在莫斯科学习,在那里他写了关于历史与意识的论文,并遇到了他的波兰妻子玛丽亚。乔治过去常常谦虚地说,他只是卡尔·马克思著作方面的专家。尽管他在Eotvös Loránd大学为匈牙利最有前途的哲学家教授了10年的现代哲学史,后来又为悉尼大学的哲学系学生教授了20年。在20世纪70年代早期,乔治邀请亚诺斯·基斯和György本斯为他的下一个项目工作,这个项目后来成为匈牙利版Überhaupt,也就是《批判经济理论是如何可能的?》今年由布里尔出版的新英译本向国际读者开启了对马克思著作的重要反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thesis Eleven
Thesis Eleven SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Established in 1996 Thesis Eleven is a truly international and interdisciplinary peer reviewed journal. Innovative and authorative the journal encourages the development of social theory in the broadest sense by consistently producing articles, reviews and debate with a central focus on theories of society, culture, and politics and the understanding of modernity. The purpose of this journal is to encourage the development of social theory in the broadest sense. We view social theory as both multidisciplinary and plural, reaching across social sciences and liberal arts and cultivating a diversity of critical theories of modernity across both the German and French senses of critical theory.
期刊最新文献
Jeffrey Alexander, a statesman in social theory and cultural sociology: An interview with Frédéric Vandenberghe From systems to forms: Reconstructing Niklas Luhmann’s approach to relationships Cornelius Castoriadis and Jacques Ellul on the dilemmas of technical autonomy ‘The coldest of all cold monsters’: Friedrich Nietzsche as a constitutional theorist Book review: The Work of History: Writing for Stuart Macintyre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1