Education Prototyping: a Methodological Device for Technical Democracy

Teresa Swist, Kalervo N. Gulson, Greg Thompson
{"title":"Education Prototyping: a Methodological Device for Technical Democracy","authors":"Teresa Swist, Kalervo N. Gulson, Greg Thompson","doi":"10.1007/s42438-023-00426-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The potential of applying a ‘technical democracy’ (Callon et al. 2009) to the context of sociotechnical controversies in education is the focus of this paper. This process reflects an emergent 'thought collective' (Fleck 1979) whose common interests, yet diverse expertise, are articulated through provisional objects and infrastructure for collective and experimental knowledge production. The technique of ‘prototyping’ was then deployed for a design experiment to: first, slow down, or suspend, existing power relations of co-evolving technologies and methodologies and, second, to accelerate, or expand, new possibilities and configurations for democratisation. Education prototyping is then introduced, with the intent to co-produce pluralistic spaces that expose challenges and test possibilities. Key aspects include the following: (i) prototyping dynamics: problematization and prefiguration; and, (ii) prototyping practices: spanning the temporal, methodological, relational, material, and spatial. These aspects were tested in the context of a research project exploring automated essay scoring in Australian schools. While always situated and partial, we argue that prototyping offers a unique device to interrupt and experiment with the politics of collaboratively researching increasingly networked and commercialised technologies across education and society.","PeriodicalId":489236,"journal":{"name":"Postdigital Science and Education","volume":"48 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postdigital Science and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00426-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The potential of applying a ‘technical democracy’ (Callon et al. 2009) to the context of sociotechnical controversies in education is the focus of this paper. This process reflects an emergent 'thought collective' (Fleck 1979) whose common interests, yet diverse expertise, are articulated through provisional objects and infrastructure for collective and experimental knowledge production. The technique of ‘prototyping’ was then deployed for a design experiment to: first, slow down, or suspend, existing power relations of co-evolving technologies and methodologies and, second, to accelerate, or expand, new possibilities and configurations for democratisation. Education prototyping is then introduced, with the intent to co-produce pluralistic spaces that expose challenges and test possibilities. Key aspects include the following: (i) prototyping dynamics: problematization and prefiguration; and, (ii) prototyping practices: spanning the temporal, methodological, relational, material, and spatial. These aspects were tested in the context of a research project exploring automated essay scoring in Australian schools. While always situated and partial, we argue that prototyping offers a unique device to interrupt and experiment with the politics of collaboratively researching increasingly networked and commercialised technologies across education and society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育原型:技术民主的方法论工具
将“技术民主”(Callon et al. 2009)应用于教育社会技术争议背景的潜力是本文的重点。这一过程反映了一个新兴的“思想集体”(Fleck 1979),他们的共同利益,但不同的专业知识,通过集体和实验知识生产的临时对象和基础设施来表达。“原型”技术随后被用于设计实验:首先,减缓或暂停共同发展的技术和方法的现有权力关系,其次,加速或扩展民主化的新可能性和配置。然后引入教育原型,目的是共同产生多元化的空间,暴露挑战和测试可能性。关键方面包括以下方面:(i)原型动力学:问题化和预配置;(ii)原型实践:跨越时间、方法、关系、材料和空间。这些方面在一个研究项目的背景下进行了测试,该项目探索了澳大利亚学校的自动作文评分。我们认为,原型设计提供了一种独特的手段,可以中断和实验跨教育和社会合作研究日益网络化和商业化的技术的政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review of Dave Cormier (2024). Learning in a Time of Abundance: The Community Is the Curriculum How AI Works: Reconfiguring Lifelong Learning Review of Tiziana Terranova (2022). After the Internet: Digital Networks between Capital and the Common Flatulence, Wonder, and Artificial Intelligence: Montaigne and Emerging Technologies An Alternative Approach to Science and Technology Parks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1