Comparison of the Structure of Soil Microbial Communities of Different Ecosystems Using the Microbiome Sequencing Approach

IF 2.9 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Systems Pub Date : 2023-08-02 DOI:10.3390/soilsystems7030070
Audrius Kačergius, Diana Sivojienė, Renata Gudiukaitė, Eugenija Bakšienė, Aistė Masevičienė, Lina Žičkienė
{"title":"Comparison of the Structure of Soil Microbial Communities of Different Ecosystems Using the Microbiome Sequencing Approach","authors":"Audrius Kačergius, Diana Sivojienė, Renata Gudiukaitė, Eugenija Bakšienė, Aistė Masevičienė, Lina Žičkienė","doi":"10.3390/soilsystems7030070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we aimed to compare the functional and taxonomic composition of soil microbial communities in different ecosystems, agricultural, natural grasslands, and old-growth forests, in the context of different environmental conditions. In this research, cultivable microbial quantification was performed by conventional plate-count techniques using different selective media. The taxonomic structure of microbe communities was evaluated using NGS metagenomic sequencing on the Illumina platform NovaSeq. The taxonomic analysis showed that individual land uses are characterized by the specific structure of communities; some taxonomic groups are specific only to agricultural, grassland, or forest ecosystems. After determining the abundance of functional groups of culturable microorganisms by the conventional plate-count method, statistically significant quantitative differences in physiological groups between the individual ecosystems were revealed. The metagenomic analysis revealed that different ecosystems are characterized by specific taxonomic groups of microorganisms and that general alpha diversity varies among individual land-use samples. Since the most unstable soil systems are agricultural, they are likely to suffer the most and will suffer more in the future from climate change than natural ones.","PeriodicalId":21908,"journal":{"name":"Soil Systems","volume":"188 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems7030070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to compare the functional and taxonomic composition of soil microbial communities in different ecosystems, agricultural, natural grasslands, and old-growth forests, in the context of different environmental conditions. In this research, cultivable microbial quantification was performed by conventional plate-count techniques using different selective media. The taxonomic structure of microbe communities was evaluated using NGS metagenomic sequencing on the Illumina platform NovaSeq. The taxonomic analysis showed that individual land uses are characterized by the specific structure of communities; some taxonomic groups are specific only to agricultural, grassland, or forest ecosystems. After determining the abundance of functional groups of culturable microorganisms by the conventional plate-count method, statistically significant quantitative differences in physiological groups between the individual ecosystems were revealed. The metagenomic analysis revealed that different ecosystems are characterized by specific taxonomic groups of microorganisms and that general alpha diversity varies among individual land-use samples. Since the most unstable soil systems are agricultural, they are likely to suffer the most and will suffer more in the future from climate change than natural ones.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用微生物组测序方法比较不同生态系统土壤微生物群落结构
在本研究中,我们旨在比较不同环境条件下不同生态系统、农业、天然草地和原生林土壤微生物群落的功能和分类组成。在本研究中,可培养微生物的定量是通过传统的平板计数技术使用不同的选择培养基进行的。在Illumina平台NovaSeq上使用NGS宏基因组测序对微生物群落的分类结构进行评估。分类学分析表明,个体土地利用的特点是群落结构的特殊性;有些分类群只针对农业、草地或森林生态系统。在用传统的平板计数法确定可培养微生物功能群的丰度后,揭示了个体生态系统之间生理群的数量差异具有统计学意义。宏基因组分析表明,不同的生态系统具有不同的微生物类群,不同土地利用样品的α多样性存在差异。由于最不稳定的土壤系统是农业土壤系统,它们可能受到的影响最大,而且在未来将比自然土壤系统受到的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Systems
Soil Systems Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Structural Shifts in the Soil Prokaryotic Communities Marking the Podzol-Forming Process on Sand Dumps Soil Phytomining: Recent Developments—A Review Selenium and Heavy Metals in Soil–Plant System in a Hydrogeochemical Province with High Selenium Content in Groundwater: A Case Study of the Lower Dniester Valley Tillage and Cover Crop Systems Alter Soil Particle Size Distribution in Raised-Bed-and-Furrow Row-Crop Agroecosystems Shifts in Soil Bacterial Communities under Three-Year Fertilization Management and Multiple Cropping Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1