Safety and Effectiveness of High-dose Liposomal Amphotericin B: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Alternative therapies in health and medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01
Xinyin Fu, Chunping Zhang, Xiaoru Lin, Xiufen Zheng, Qibing Liu, Yan Jin
{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness of High-dose Liposomal Amphotericin B: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Xinyin Fu, Chunping Zhang, Xiaoru Lin, Xiufen Zheng, Qibing Liu, Yan Jin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the level of medical care has been improved in recent years, the probability of patients contracting pathogens has increased greatly, with a rising incidence of invasive fungal infections. Deep-seated fungi have become common pathogens of nosocomial infections.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to systematically assess the effectiveness, mortality, survival rate, and adverse reactions (ARs) of high-dose (HD) liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) for human diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten articles (1661 patients) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs; whether randomized, single-blind, or double-blind) from January 1, 1960, to December 31, 2020, of HD-L-AMB treatment of diseases were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. The primary outcome measure was the overall therapeutic effect, and the secondary outcome measures were mortality, ≥10-week survival, and ARs. Data were meta-analyzed using RevMan 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten RCTs involving 1661 patients were included. HD-L-AMB did not show a significant therapeutic advantage in anti-infection treatment. In addition, HD-L-AMB treatment of invasive Aspergillus infection led to high mortality and low survival (≥10 weeks, OR = 0.57, 95%CI 0.34-0.94, P = .03). According to subgroup analysis, the incidence of ARs and the incidence of renal dysfunction associated with invasive fungal infection treatment were higher with HD-L-AMB than with regular-dose L-AMB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HD-L-AMB had no obvious advantage for the treatment of diseases and was accompanied by increased mortality, reduced long-term survival, and increased ARs (including renal insufficiency). Therefore, the use of HD-L-AMB to control infections is recommended with caution only when the preferred treatment is contraindicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although the level of medical care has been improved in recent years, the probability of patients contracting pathogens has increased greatly, with a rising incidence of invasive fungal infections. Deep-seated fungi have become common pathogens of nosocomial infections.

Objective: This study aims to systematically assess the effectiveness, mortality, survival rate, and adverse reactions (ARs) of high-dose (HD) liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) for human diseases.

Methods: Ten articles (1661 patients) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs; whether randomized, single-blind, or double-blind) from January 1, 1960, to December 31, 2020, of HD-L-AMB treatment of diseases were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. The primary outcome measure was the overall therapeutic effect, and the secondary outcome measures were mortality, ≥10-week survival, and ARs. Data were meta-analyzed using RevMan 5.3.

Results: Ten RCTs involving 1661 patients were included. HD-L-AMB did not show a significant therapeutic advantage in anti-infection treatment. In addition, HD-L-AMB treatment of invasive Aspergillus infection led to high mortality and low survival (≥10 weeks, OR = 0.57, 95%CI 0.34-0.94, P = .03). According to subgroup analysis, the incidence of ARs and the incidence of renal dysfunction associated with invasive fungal infection treatment were higher with HD-L-AMB than with regular-dose L-AMB.

Conclusion: HD-L-AMB had no obvious advantage for the treatment of diseases and was accompanied by increased mortality, reduced long-term survival, and increased ARs (including renal insufficiency). Therefore, the use of HD-L-AMB to control infections is recommended with caution only when the preferred treatment is contraindicated.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高剂量两性霉素B脂质体的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
背景:虽然近年来医疗水平有所提高,但患者感染病原体的概率大大增加,侵袭性真菌感染的发生率也在上升。深层真菌已成为医院感染的常见病原体。目的:系统评价高剂量两性霉素B (HD)脂质体治疗人类疾病的疗效、死亡率、生存率和不良反应(ARs)。方法:随机对照试验10篇(1661例);从PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials数据库中检索1960年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间的所有关于dd - l - amb治疗疾病的数据,包括随机、单盲或双盲。主要结局指标是总体治疗效果,次要结局指标是死亡率、≥10周生存期和ar。数据采用RevMan 5.3进行meta分析。结果:纳入10项随机对照试验,共1661例患者。HD-L-AMB在抗感染治疗中没有明显的治疗优势。此外,HD-L-AMB治疗侵袭性曲霉感染导致高死亡率和低生存率(≥10周,OR = 0.57, 95%CI 0.34-0.94, P = 0.03)。根据亚组分析,与侵袭性真菌感染治疗相关的ar发生率和肾功能障碍发生率,HD-L-AMB高于常规剂量的L-AMB。结论:HD-L-AMB在治疗疾病方面无明显优势,并伴有死亡率升高、长期生存率降低、ARs升高(包括肾功能不全)。因此,仅当首选治疗禁忌时,建议谨慎使用HD-L-AMB来控制感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alternative therapies in health and medicine
Alternative therapies in health and medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.
期刊最新文献
Complete Resolution of Plantar Psoriasis With Ayurveda, A Case Report. Humor and Laughter in Health Promotion Interventions and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Disciplinary Narrative Review. Low Concentrations of Wyethia Helenioides-derived Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory Against Allergic Rhinitis. The Effects of Fisetin on Reducing Biological Aging: A Pilot Study. Circular RNA Pum_0014 Targets miR-146a-5p/NF2 Axis to Regulate VEGF/PAK1 Pathway and Reduce H2O2-induced Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1