How to objectively evaluate the impact of image-guided surgery technologies.

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-16 DOI:10.1007/s00259-023-06504-w
Jonathan M Sorger
{"title":"How to objectively evaluate the impact of image-guided surgery technologies.","authors":"Jonathan M Sorger","doi":"10.1007/s00259-023-06504-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This manuscript aims to provide a better understanding of methods and techniques with which one can better quantify the impact of image-guided surgical technologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted with regard to economic and technical methods of medical device evaluation in various countries. Attention was focused on applications related to image-guided interventions that have enabled procedures to be performed in a minimally invasive manner, produced superior clinical outcomes, or have become standard of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review provides examples of successful implementations and adoption of image-guided surgical techniques, mostly in the field of neurosurgery. Failures as well as newly developed technologies still undergoing cost-efficacy analysis are discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The field of image-guided surgery has evolved from solely using preoperative images to utilizing highly specific tools and software to provide more information to the interventionalist in real time. While deformations in soft tissue often preclude the use of such instruments outside of neurosurgery, recent developments in optical and radioactive guidance have enabled surgeons to better account for organ motion and provide feedback to the surgeon as tissue is cut. These technologies are currently undergoing value assessments in many countries and hold promise to improve outcomes for patients, surgeons, care teams, payors, and society in general.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06504-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This manuscript aims to provide a better understanding of methods and techniques with which one can better quantify the impact of image-guided surgical technologies.

Methods: A literature review was conducted with regard to economic and technical methods of medical device evaluation in various countries. Attention was focused on applications related to image-guided interventions that have enabled procedures to be performed in a minimally invasive manner, produced superior clinical outcomes, or have become standard of care.

Results: The review provides examples of successful implementations and adoption of image-guided surgical techniques, mostly in the field of neurosurgery. Failures as well as newly developed technologies still undergoing cost-efficacy analysis are discussed.

Conclusion: The field of image-guided surgery has evolved from solely using preoperative images to utilizing highly specific tools and software to provide more information to the interventionalist in real time. While deformations in soft tissue often preclude the use of such instruments outside of neurosurgery, recent developments in optical and radioactive guidance have enabled surgeons to better account for organ motion and provide feedback to the surgeon as tissue is cut. These technologies are currently undergoing value assessments in many countries and hold promise to improve outcomes for patients, surgeons, care teams, payors, and society in general.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何客观评价影像引导手术技术的影响。
目的:本文旨在提供更好的方法和技术的理解,人们可以更好地量化图像引导手术技术的影响。方法:对各国医疗器械评价的经济技术方法进行文献综述。注意力集中在与图像引导干预相关的应用上,这些应用使手术能够以微创方式进行,产生优越的临床结果,或已成为标准护理。结果:本综述提供了成功实施和采用图像引导手术技术的例子,主要是在神经外科领域。讨论了失败以及仍在进行成本效益分析的新开发技术。结论:图像引导手术领域已经从单纯使用术前图像发展到利用高度特异性的工具和软件实时为介入医师提供更多信息。虽然软组织的变形常常使神经外科以外的此类器械无法使用,但光学和放射性引导的最新发展使外科医生能够更好地解释器官运动,并在组织被切割时向外科医生提供反馈。这些技术目前正在许多国家进行价值评估,有望改善患者、外科医生、护理团队、支付方和整个社会的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative assessment of pancreatic cancer with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR versus [18F]-FDG PET/CT plus contrast-enhanced CT: a prospective preliminary study [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT as an early indicator of complete remission in a patient treated with pembrolizumab for stage IV NSCLC αvβ6-integrin targeted [68Ga]Ga-Trivehexin PET/CT imaging of a rare bronchial mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Smaller is better? Compact vs. Conventional gamma camera for sentinel lymph node localization in patients with breast cancer. Combined brain and spinal FDG PET in the differentiation between ALS and ALS mimics - correction and additional validation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1