Immunoassay testing for barbiturates using alternative matrices in postmortem tissues from cats and dogs.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Journal of analytical toxicology Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1093/jat/bkad087
Courtney Valerio, Megan C Romano, Rupam Sarma, Adam W Stern
{"title":"Immunoassay testing for barbiturates using alternative matrices in postmortem tissues from cats and dogs.","authors":"Courtney Valerio, Megan C Romano, Rupam Sarma, Adam W Stern","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkad087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The barbiturate drug pentobarbital is commonly used by veterinarians for the euthanasia of domestic animals. During the veterinary forensic autopsy, it is sometimes necessary to determine whether the animal was chemically euthanized with pentobarbital. The use of a human immunochromatographic test for barbiturate screening utilizing dog or cat urine has been previously validated; however, the use of alternative matrices for this purpose is yet to be explored when urine is not available. Postmortem heart, liver, spleen, skeletal muscle, blood and/or urine samples from 20 dogs and 26 cats with a reported chemical euthanasia status were processed using two different methods, bead homogenization and sonication, and screened for barbiturates using a human immunochromatographic test. There was 100% agreement of the immunochromatographic test results using the sonication method with the reported euthanasia status of both dogs and cats. Using the bead homogenization method, agreement with the reported euthanasia status was 93.3% and 96.7% for dogs and cats, respectively, due to invalid test results from four dog and two cat samples. A subset of liver samples (10 canine and 10 feline) was analyzed via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and there was 100% agreement between the immunochromatographic test results and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry results for both cats and dogs. Overall, our results support the use of a variety of alternative matrices for barbiturate screening in cats and dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkad087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The barbiturate drug pentobarbital is commonly used by veterinarians for the euthanasia of domestic animals. During the veterinary forensic autopsy, it is sometimes necessary to determine whether the animal was chemically euthanized with pentobarbital. The use of a human immunochromatographic test for barbiturate screening utilizing dog or cat urine has been previously validated; however, the use of alternative matrices for this purpose is yet to be explored when urine is not available. Postmortem heart, liver, spleen, skeletal muscle, blood and/or urine samples from 20 dogs and 26 cats with a reported chemical euthanasia status were processed using two different methods, bead homogenization and sonication, and screened for barbiturates using a human immunochromatographic test. There was 100% agreement of the immunochromatographic test results using the sonication method with the reported euthanasia status of both dogs and cats. Using the bead homogenization method, agreement with the reported euthanasia status was 93.3% and 96.7% for dogs and cats, respectively, due to invalid test results from four dog and two cat samples. A subset of liver samples (10 canine and 10 feline) was analyzed via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and there was 100% agreement between the immunochromatographic test results and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry results for both cats and dogs. Overall, our results support the use of a variety of alternative matrices for barbiturate screening in cats and dogs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在猫和狗的死后组织中使用替代基质进行巴比妥酸盐的免疫测定。
巴比妥类药物戊巴比妥通常被兽医用于家畜安乐死。在兽医法医解剖过程中,有时需要确定动物是否被戊巴比妥化学安乐死。利用狗或猫的尿液进行巴比妥酸盐筛选的人类免疫层析试验先前已得到验证;然而,在没有尿液的情况下,用于这一目的的替代基质的使用尚未探索。20只狗和26只猫的死后心脏、肝脏、脾脏、骨骼肌、血液和/或尿液样本被报告为化学安乐死状态,使用两种不同的方法进行处理,头均质和超声,并使用人类免疫层析测试筛选巴比妥酸盐。使用超声方法的免疫层析测试结果与报告的狗和猫的安乐死状态100%一致。由于4只狗和2只猫的检测结果无效,采用珠粒均质法,狗和猫的安乐死状态与报告的一致性分别为93.3%和96.7%。通过气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)分析了一部分肝脏样本(10只犬和10只猫),猫和狗的免疫层析测试结果与GC-MS结果100%一致。总的来说,我们的结果支持在猫和狗中使用各种替代基质进行巴比妥酸盐筛选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Long-term stability of sufentanil quantified by UPLC-MS-MS in human plasma frozen for 11 years at -20°C. Double Designers: Detection of Bromazolam and Metonitazene in Postmortem Casework. Liquid-Liquid Extraction Solvent Selection for Comparing Illegal Drugs in Whole Blood and Dried Blood Spot with LC-MS/MS. Detection of "smoke powder" etomidate and its metabolite etomidate acid in blood and urine by UHPLC-MS/MS: Application in authentic cases. The Rise of Bromazolam in Postmortem Cases from Travis County, Texas and Surrounding Areas: 2021-2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1