Biocompatibility Considerations for Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products and Other Drug--Device Combination Products.

Cheryl L M Stults, Christine L Lanning, Lee M Nagao, James Conners
{"title":"Biocompatibility Considerations for Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products and Other Drug--Device Combination Products.","authors":"Cheryl L M Stults, Christine L Lanning, Lee M Nagao, James Conners","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2023.012852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biocompatibility considerations have historically been important for orally inhaled and nasal drug products (OINDPs) and other drug-device combination products, because finished device components and packaging in these products are often in direct contact with formulation and the patient. The International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) discusses, in this article, the current regulatory landscape associated with biocompatibility and how biocompatibility is typically assessed for OINDPs, including risk management considerations and navigation of regulatory requirements. The article also describes current challenges related to alignment of regulatory expectations, particularly for drug-device combination products, and proposes some questions and topics for further discussion with regulatory agencies and other stakeholders to help advance alignment. To further illustrate current challenges and industry approaches to meeting biocompatibility requirements, we also present results of an IPAC-RS benchmarking survey and case studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"125-139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2023.012852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biocompatibility considerations have historically been important for orally inhaled and nasal drug products (OINDPs) and other drug-device combination products, because finished device components and packaging in these products are often in direct contact with formulation and the patient. The International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) discusses, in this article, the current regulatory landscape associated with biocompatibility and how biocompatibility is typically assessed for OINDPs, including risk management considerations and navigation of regulatory requirements. The article also describes current challenges related to alignment of regulatory expectations, particularly for drug-device combination products, and proposes some questions and topics for further discussion with regulatory agencies and other stakeholders to help advance alignment. To further illustrate current challenges and industry approaches to meeting biocompatibility requirements, we also present results of an IPAC-RS benchmarking survey and case studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口服吸入和鼻用药物制品和其他药物器械组合制品的生物相容性考虑。
生物相容性考虑历来对口服吸入和鼻用药物产品(OINDP)和其他药物器械组合产品很重要,因为这些产品中的成品器械组件和包装通常与制剂和患者直接接触。国际医药气雾剂法规与科学联盟(IPAC-RS)在本文中讨论了当前与生物相容性相关的监管格局,以及如何评估OINDP的生物相容性,包括风险管理考虑和监管要求的导航。本文还描述了当前与监管期望一致相关的挑战,特别是对于药物器械组合产品,并提出了一些问题和主题,以便与监管机构和其他利益相关者进一步讨论,以帮助推进一致性。为了进一步说明当前的挑战和满足生物相容性要求的行业方法,我们还介绍了IPAC-RS基准调查和案例研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Addressing Medical Device Extractables and Leachables via Non-Target Analysis (NTA); The Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) and Quantitation. Definition of particle visibility threshold in parenteral drug products - towards standardization of visual inspection operator qualification. Recommendations for Artificial Intelligence Application in Continued Process Verification. Comparing Container Closure Integrity Test Methods-Performance of Headspace Carbon Dioxide Analysis versus Helium Leakage Using Positive Controls. Case Studies on Changes and Proposed Process Development Approaches Reflecting Applicability of PDA Technical Report No. 89: Strategies for Vaccine Development and Lifecycle Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1