"Go ahead and screen" - advice to healthcare systems for routine lynch syndrome screening from interviews with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1186/s13053-023-00270-4
Jennifer L Schneider, Alison J Firemark, Sara Gille, James Davis, Pamala A Pawloski, Su-Ying Liang, Mara M Epstein, Jan Lowery, Christine Y Lu, Ravi N Sharaf, Andrea N Burnett-Hartman, Victoria Schlieder, Zachary M Salvati, Deborah Cragun, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Jessica Ezzell Hunter
{"title":"\"Go ahead and screen\" - advice to healthcare systems for routine lynch syndrome screening from interviews with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients.","authors":"Jennifer L Schneider, Alison J Firemark, Sara Gille, James Davis, Pamala A Pawloski, Su-Ying Liang, Mara M Epstein, Jan Lowery, Christine Y Lu, Ravi N Sharaf, Andrea N Burnett-Hartman, Victoria Schlieder, Zachary M Salvati, Deborah Cragun, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Jessica Ezzell Hunter","doi":"10.1186/s13053-023-00270-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common cause of inherited colorectal cancer (CRC). Universal tumor screening (UTS) of newly diagnosed CRC cases is recommended to aid in diagnosis of LS and reduce cancer-related morbidity and mortality. However, not all health systems have adopted UTS processes and implementation may be inconsistent due to system and patient-level complexities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To identify barriers, facilitators, and suggestions for improvements of the UTS process from the patient perspective, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with patients recently diagnosed with CRC, but not screened for or aware of LS. Patients were recruited from eight regionally diverse US health systems. Interviews were conducted by telephone, 60-minutes, audio-recorded, and transcribed. An inductive, constant comparative analysis approach was employed.  RESULTS: We completed 75 interviews across the eight systems. Most participants were white (79%), about half (52%) were men, and the mean age was 60 years. Most self-reported either no (60%) or minimal (40%) prior awareness of LS. Overall, 96% of patients stated UTS should be a routine standard of care for CRC tumors, consistently citing four primary motivations for wanting to know their LS status and engage in the process for LS identification: \"knowledge is power\"; \"family knowledge\"; \"prevention and detection\"; and \"treatment and surveillance.\" Common concerns pertaining to the process of screening for and identifying LS included: creating anticipatory worry for patients, the potential cost and the accuracy of the genetic test, and possibly having one's health insurance coverage impacted by the LS diagnosis. Patients suggested health systems communicate LS results in-person or by phone from a trained expert in LS; offer proactive verbal and written education about LS, the screening steps, and any follow-up surveillance recommendations; and support patients in communicating their LS screening to any of their blood relatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our qualitative findings demonstrate patients with CRC have a strong desire for healthcare systems to regularly implement and offer UTS. Patients offer key insights for health systems to guide future implementation and optimization of UTS and other LS screening programs and maximize diagnosis of individuals with LS and improve cancer-related surveillance and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not available: not a clinical trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":55058,"journal":{"name":"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13053-023-00270-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common cause of inherited colorectal cancer (CRC). Universal tumor screening (UTS) of newly diagnosed CRC cases is recommended to aid in diagnosis of LS and reduce cancer-related morbidity and mortality. However, not all health systems have adopted UTS processes and implementation may be inconsistent due to system and patient-level complexities.

Methods: To identify barriers, facilitators, and suggestions for improvements of the UTS process from the patient perspective, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with patients recently diagnosed with CRC, but not screened for or aware of LS. Patients were recruited from eight regionally diverse US health systems. Interviews were conducted by telephone, 60-minutes, audio-recorded, and transcribed. An inductive, constant comparative analysis approach was employed.  RESULTS: We completed 75 interviews across the eight systems. Most participants were white (79%), about half (52%) were men, and the mean age was 60 years. Most self-reported either no (60%) or minimal (40%) prior awareness of LS. Overall, 96% of patients stated UTS should be a routine standard of care for CRC tumors, consistently citing four primary motivations for wanting to know their LS status and engage in the process for LS identification: "knowledge is power"; "family knowledge"; "prevention and detection"; and "treatment and surveillance." Common concerns pertaining to the process of screening for and identifying LS included: creating anticipatory worry for patients, the potential cost and the accuracy of the genetic test, and possibly having one's health insurance coverage impacted by the LS diagnosis. Patients suggested health systems communicate LS results in-person or by phone from a trained expert in LS; offer proactive verbal and written education about LS, the screening steps, and any follow-up surveillance recommendations; and support patients in communicating their LS screening to any of their blood relatives.

Conclusion: Our qualitative findings demonstrate patients with CRC have a strong desire for healthcare systems to regularly implement and offer UTS. Patients offer key insights for health systems to guide future implementation and optimization of UTS and other LS screening programs and maximize diagnosis of individuals with LS and improve cancer-related surveillance and outcomes.

Trial registration: Not available: not a clinical trial.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“继续进行筛查”-对新诊断的结直肠癌患者进行常规lynch综合征筛查的医疗保健系统的建议。
背景:Lynch综合征(LS)是遗传性结直肠癌(CRC)最常见的病因。建议对新诊断的CRC病例进行普遍肿瘤筛查(UTS),以帮助诊断LS并降低癌症相关的发病率和死亡率。然而,并非所有卫生系统都采用了UTS流程,由于系统和患者层面的复杂性,实施可能不一致。方法:为了从患者的角度确定障碍、促进因素和改进UTS过程的建议,我们对最近诊断为CRC但未筛查或未意识到LS的患者进行了深入的半结构化访谈。患者从美国8个不同地区的卫生系统中招募。访谈以电话方式进行,时长60分钟,录音并抄写。采用归纳的、恒定的比较分析方法。结果:我们在8个系统中完成了75次访谈。大多数参与者是白人(79%),大约一半(52%)是男性,平均年龄为60岁。大多数自我报告没有(60%)或很少(40%)事先意识到LS。总体而言,96%的患者表示UTS应成为结直肠癌肿瘤的常规护理标准,并一直引用四个主要动机来了解他们的LS状态并参与LS识别过程:“知识就是力量”;“家庭知识”;“预防和发现”;以及“治疗和监视”。与筛查和识别LS过程有关的常见问题包括:为患者带来预期的担忧,潜在的成本和基因测试的准确性,以及可能因LS诊断而影响个人的健康保险范围。患者建议卫生系统亲自或通过训练有素的LS专家电话通报LS结果;提供主动的口头和书面教育,关于LS的筛查步骤,以及任何后续监测建议;并支持患者与任何血亲沟通他们的LS筛查。结论:我们的定性研究结果表明,CRC患者强烈希望医疗保健系统定期实施和提供UTS。患者为卫生系统提供了关键的见解,以指导未来实施和优化UTS和其他LS筛查项目,最大限度地诊断LS患者,改善癌症相关的监测和结果。试验注册:Not available:不是临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice is an open access journal that publishes articles of interest for the cancer genetics community and serves as a discussion forum for the development appropriate healthcare strategies. Cancer genetics encompasses a wide variety of disciplines and knowledge in the field is rapidly growing, especially as the amount of information linking genetic differences to inherited cancer predispositions continues expanding. With the increased knowledge of genetic variability and how this relates to cancer risk there is a growing demand not only to disseminate this information into clinical practice but also to enable competent debate concerning how such information is managed and what it implies for patient care. Topics covered by the journal include but are not limited to: Original research articles on any aspect of inherited predispositions to cancer. Reviews of inherited cancer predispositions. Application of molecular and cytogenetic analysis to clinical decision making. Clinical aspects of the management of hereditary cancers. Genetic counselling issues associated with cancer genetics. The role of registries in improving health care of patients with an inherited predisposition to cancer.
期刊最新文献
Current advances and challenges in Managing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC): a narrative review. PMS2 mutation spectra in Norway and risk of cancer for carriers of pathogenic variants. Blood molybdenum level as a marker of cancer risk on BRCA1 carriers Universal screening of colorectal tumors for lynch syndrome: a survey of patient experiences and opinions. Adrenal tumours in patients with pathogenic APC mutations: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1