Perinatal outcome and long-term hospitalization of triplets according to birth order

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1111/birt.12798
David Nadav Sabag BMSc, Gali Pariente MD, Eyal Sheiner MD, PhD, Shayna Miodownik MSc, Tamar Wainstock PhD
{"title":"Perinatal outcome and long-term hospitalization of triplets according to birth order","authors":"David Nadav Sabag BMSc,&nbsp;Gali Pariente MD,&nbsp;Eyal Sheiner MD, PhD,&nbsp;Shayna Miodownik MSc,&nbsp;Tamar Wainstock PhD","doi":"10.1111/birt.12798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The association between birth order and adverse perinatal outcomes has been well studied in twin pregnancies. However, little is known about the differences in immediate perinatal outcomes as well as long-term hospitalization of the offspring in triplet pregnancies according to their birth order. As such, we aimed to assess the differences in immediate perinatal outcomes and long-term hospitalizations among triplets by their birth order.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a retrospective hospital-based cohort study, immediate perinatal outcomes and long-term hospitalizations were compared among triplet siblings according to their birth order. Deliveries occurred between the years 1991 and 2021 in a tertiary medical center. The study groups were followed until 18 years of age for cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, and infection-related hospitalizations. Generalized estimation equation (GEE) models were used to control for confounders. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used to compare cumulative long-term hospitalization incidences and Cox proportional hazards models were performed to control for confounders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 117 triplet deliveries. Rates of small for gestational age (SGA) infants increased linearly by birth order (6.0%, 7.7%, and 15.4% for the first, second, and third siblings, respectively; <i>p</i>-value for trends = 0.035). Using a GEE model controlling for maternal age, being born third in a triplet pregnancy was independently associated with SGA (third vs. first sibling, adjusted OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.38–6.59, <i>p</i> = 0.005). No significant differences in cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, and infection-related hospitalizations were noted among the first, second, and third siblings. Likewise, using Kaplan–Meier survival analyses, no significant differences in the cumulative incidence of long-term pediatric hospitalizations were noted between the siblings. In Cox proportional hazards models, controlling for weight and gender, birth order in a triplet pregnancy did not exhibit an association with long-term hospitalizations of the offspring.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the association between birth order and SGA, birth order in triplets does not seem to have an impact on the risk for long-term offspring hospitalization.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 2","pages":"424-431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/birt.12798","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The association between birth order and adverse perinatal outcomes has been well studied in twin pregnancies. However, little is known about the differences in immediate perinatal outcomes as well as long-term hospitalization of the offspring in triplet pregnancies according to their birth order. As such, we aimed to assess the differences in immediate perinatal outcomes and long-term hospitalizations among triplets by their birth order.

Methods

In a retrospective hospital-based cohort study, immediate perinatal outcomes and long-term hospitalizations were compared among triplet siblings according to their birth order. Deliveries occurred between the years 1991 and 2021 in a tertiary medical center. The study groups were followed until 18 years of age for cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, and infection-related hospitalizations. Generalized estimation equation (GEE) models were used to control for confounders. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used to compare cumulative long-term hospitalization incidences and Cox proportional hazards models were performed to control for confounders.

Results

The study included 117 triplet deliveries. Rates of small for gestational age (SGA) infants increased linearly by birth order (6.0%, 7.7%, and 15.4% for the first, second, and third siblings, respectively; p-value for trends = 0.035). Using a GEE model controlling for maternal age, being born third in a triplet pregnancy was independently associated with SGA (third vs. first sibling, adjusted OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.38–6.59, p = 0.005). No significant differences in cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, and infection-related hospitalizations were noted among the first, second, and third siblings. Likewise, using Kaplan–Meier survival analyses, no significant differences in the cumulative incidence of long-term pediatric hospitalizations were noted between the siblings. In Cox proportional hazards models, controlling for weight and gender, birth order in a triplet pregnancy did not exhibit an association with long-term hospitalizations of the offspring.

Conclusion

Despite the association between birth order and SGA, birth order in triplets does not seem to have an impact on the risk for long-term offspring hospitalization.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三胞胎出生顺序的围产儿结局和长期住院。
目的:在双胎妊娠中,出生顺序与不良围产期结局之间的关系已经得到了很好的研究。然而,根据出生顺序,对三胞胎妊娠的后代的即时围产期结局以及长期住院治疗的差异知之甚少。因此,我们的目的是根据三胞胎的出生顺序来评估其即时围产期结局和长期住院治疗的差异。方法:在一项以医院为基础的回顾性队列研究中,根据出生顺序比较三胞胎兄弟姐妹的即时围产期结局和长期住院情况。1991年至2021年期间在三级医疗中心分娩。研究人员对这些研究组的心血管、呼吸系统、神经系统和感染相关的住院情况进行了随访,直到18岁。采用广义估计方程(GEE)模型控制混杂因素。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线用于比较累积长期住院率,Cox比例风险模型用于控制混杂因素。结果:本研究包括117例三胞胎分娩。胎龄小(SGA)婴儿的比例随出生顺序线性增加(第一、第二和第三兄弟姐妹分别为6.0%、7.7%和15.4%);趋势的p值= 0.035)。使用控制母亲年龄的GEE模型,在三胞胎妊娠中第三个出生与SGA独立相关(第三个vs第一个兄弟姐妹,调整OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.38-6.59, p = 0.005)。在第一、第二和第三兄弟姐妹中,心血管、呼吸、神经系统和感染相关的住院治疗没有显著差异。同样,使用Kaplan-Meier生存分析,兄弟姐妹之间长期儿科住院的累积发生率没有显著差异。在控制体重和性别的Cox比例风险模型中,三胞胎妊娠的出生顺序与后代的长期住院治疗没有关联。结论:尽管出生顺序与SGA之间存在关联,但三胞胎出生顺序似乎对后代长期住院的风险没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care is a multidisciplinary, refereed journal devoted to issues and practices in the care of childbearing women, infants, and families. It is written by and for professionals in maternal and neonatal health, nurses, midwives, physicians, public health workers, doulas, social scientists, childbirth educators, lactation counselors, epidemiologists, and other health caregivers and policymakers in perinatal care.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A History of Cesarean Birth as a Risk Factor for Postpartum Hemorrhage Even After Successful Planned Vaginal Birth. Pregnant Women's Care Needs During Early Labor-A Scoping Review. Sociodemographic and Health-Related Risk Factors Associated With Planned and Emergency Cesarean Births in Mexico. Validating the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care Framework Index: A Global Tool for Quality-of-Care Evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1