Calibration-free blood pressure estimation based on a convolutional neural network.

Psychophysiology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-16 DOI:10.1111/psyp.14480
Jinwoo Cho, Hangsik Shin, Ahyoung Choi
{"title":"Calibration-free blood pressure estimation based on a convolutional neural network.","authors":"Jinwoo Cho, Hangsik Shin, Ahyoung Choi","doi":"10.1111/psyp.14480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we conducted research on a deep learning-based blood pressure (BP) estimation model suitable for wearable environments. To measure BP while wearing a wearable watch, it needs to be considered that computing power for signal processing is limited and the input signals are subject to noise interference. Therefore, we employed a convolutional neural network (CNN) as the BP estimation model and utilized time-series electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals, which are quantifiable in a wearable context. We generated periodic input signals and used differential and thresholding methods to decrease noise in the preprocessing step. We then applied a max-pooling technique with filter sizes of 2 × 1 and 5 × 1 within a 3-layer convolutional neural network to estimate BP. Our method was trained, validated, and tested using 2.4 million data samples from 49 patients in the intensive care unit. These samples, totaling 3.1 GB were obtained from the publicly accessible MIMIC database. As a result of a test with 480,000 data samples, the average root mean square error in BP estimation was 3.41, 5.80, and 2.78 mm Hg in the prediction of pulse pressure, systolic BP (SBP), and diastolic BP (DBP), respectively. The cumulative error percentage less than 5 mm Hg was 68% and 93% for SBP and DBP, respectively. In addition, the cumulative error percentage less than 15 mm Hg was 98% and 99% for SBP and DBP. Subsequently, we evaluated the impact of changes in input signal length (1 cycle vs. 30 s) and the introduction of noise on BP estimation results. The experimental results revealed that the length of the input signal did not significantly affect the performance of CNN-based analysis. When estimating BP using noise-added ECG signals, the mean absolute error (MAE) for SBP and DBP was 9.72 and 6.67 mm Hg, respectively. Meanwhile, when using noise-added PPG signals, the MAE for SBP and DBP was 26.85 and 14.00 mm Hg, respectively. Therefore, this study confirmed that using ECG signals rather than PPG signals is advantageous for noise reduction in a wearable environment. Besides, short sampling frames without calibration can be effective as input signals. Furthermore, it demonstrated that using a model suitable for information extraction rather than a specialized deep learning model for sequential data can yield satisfactory results in BP estimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94182,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we conducted research on a deep learning-based blood pressure (BP) estimation model suitable for wearable environments. To measure BP while wearing a wearable watch, it needs to be considered that computing power for signal processing is limited and the input signals are subject to noise interference. Therefore, we employed a convolutional neural network (CNN) as the BP estimation model and utilized time-series electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals, which are quantifiable in a wearable context. We generated periodic input signals and used differential and thresholding methods to decrease noise in the preprocessing step. We then applied a max-pooling technique with filter sizes of 2 × 1 and 5 × 1 within a 3-layer convolutional neural network to estimate BP. Our method was trained, validated, and tested using 2.4 million data samples from 49 patients in the intensive care unit. These samples, totaling 3.1 GB were obtained from the publicly accessible MIMIC database. As a result of a test with 480,000 data samples, the average root mean square error in BP estimation was 3.41, 5.80, and 2.78 mm Hg in the prediction of pulse pressure, systolic BP (SBP), and diastolic BP (DBP), respectively. The cumulative error percentage less than 5 mm Hg was 68% and 93% for SBP and DBP, respectively. In addition, the cumulative error percentage less than 15 mm Hg was 98% and 99% for SBP and DBP. Subsequently, we evaluated the impact of changes in input signal length (1 cycle vs. 30 s) and the introduction of noise on BP estimation results. The experimental results revealed that the length of the input signal did not significantly affect the performance of CNN-based analysis. When estimating BP using noise-added ECG signals, the mean absolute error (MAE) for SBP and DBP was 9.72 and 6.67 mm Hg, respectively. Meanwhile, when using noise-added PPG signals, the MAE for SBP and DBP was 26.85 and 14.00 mm Hg, respectively. Therefore, this study confirmed that using ECG signals rather than PPG signals is advantageous for noise reduction in a wearable environment. Besides, short sampling frames without calibration can be effective as input signals. Furthermore, it demonstrated that using a model suitable for information extraction rather than a specialized deep learning model for sequential data can yield satisfactory results in BP estimation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于卷积神经网络的无校准血压估计。
在这项研究中,我们研究了一种适用于可穿戴环境的基于深度学习的血压(BP)估计模型。戴着可穿戴手表测量BP,需要考虑信号处理的计算能力有限,输入信号受到噪声干扰。因此,我们采用卷积神经网络(CNN)作为BP估计模型,并利用在可穿戴环境下可量化的时间序列心电图(ECG)和光容积描记图(PPG)信号。我们生成周期输入信号,并在预处理步骤中使用差分和阈值方法来降低噪声。然后,我们在3层卷积神经网络中应用过滤器大小为2 × 1和5 × 1的最大池化技术来估计BP。我们的方法经过了训练、验证和测试,使用了来自重症监护病房49名患者的240万数据样本。这些总共3.1 GB的样本来自可公开访问的MIMIC数据库。在48万个数据样本的检验中,预测脉压、收缩压和舒张压的平均均方根误差分别为3.41、5.80和2.78 mm Hg。收缩压和舒张压小于5 mm Hg的累积误差百分比分别为68%和93%。此外,收缩压和舒张压在15 mm Hg以内的累积误差百分比分别为98%和99%。随后,我们评估了输入信号长度变化(1周期vs. 30秒)和噪声引入对BP估计结果的影响。实验结果表明,输入信号的长度对基于cnn的分析性能没有显著影响。当使用添加噪声的心电信号估计血压时,收缩压和舒张压的平均绝对误差(MAE)分别为9.72和6.67 mm Hg。使用加噪PPG信号时,收缩压和舒张压的MAE分别为26.85和14.00 mm Hg。因此,本研究证实,在可穿戴环境中,使用心电信号而不是PPG信号有利于降噪。此外,无需校准的短采样帧可以作为有效的输入信号。此外,研究表明,在BP估计中,使用适合信息提取的模型而不是专门的深度学习模型来处理序列数据可以获得令人满意的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How effort-based self-interest motivation shapes altruistic donation behavior and brain responses. Beyond peaks and troughs: Multiplexed performance monitoring signals in the EEG. Reduced reward responsiveness and depression vulnerability: Consideration of social contexts and implications for intervention. Moving toward reality: Electrocortical reactivity to naturalistic multimodal emotional videos. Mapping the routes of perception: Hemispheric asymmetries in signal propagation dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1