Heterogeneous responsibilities of three grassland resource governance modes in Inner Mongolia, China

IF 3.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cjpre.2022.09.009
Duofen Chang
{"title":"Heterogeneous responsibilities of three grassland resource governance modes in Inner Mongolia, China","authors":"Duofen Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.cjpre.2022.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Grassland resource governance is an important part of ecological civilization construction, and it directly affects grassland governance performance. This study deploys principal-agent theory and uses social network analysis to compare grassland resource governance modes in China in terms of institutional settings and institutional network characteristics. This study found three types of grassland resource governance modes: self-designed, docked, and integrated. The self-designed mode forms a network structure with dual centers and multiple members, and has the second-best structural mode of the three types. The docked mode forms a network structure with a single center in which the institution is the absolute core and is relatively divergent. It has the weakest structural advantage of the three types. The integrated mode forms a network structure with a single institution at the core and other institutions distributed evenly throughout the structure. This mode has the strongest structural advantage among the three types. This study offers the practical application of improving the practice of grassland governance in China and is theoretically significant because it can contribute to improving grassland governance modes and enriching the public goods resources governance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45743,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment","volume":"20 3","pages":"Pages 274-284"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2325426222000729/pdfft?md5=e49785419e422f2250684924e719ab56&pid=1-s2.0-S2325426222000729-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2325426222000729","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grassland resource governance is an important part of ecological civilization construction, and it directly affects grassland governance performance. This study deploys principal-agent theory and uses social network analysis to compare grassland resource governance modes in China in terms of institutional settings and institutional network characteristics. This study found three types of grassland resource governance modes: self-designed, docked, and integrated. The self-designed mode forms a network structure with dual centers and multiple members, and has the second-best structural mode of the three types. The docked mode forms a network structure with a single center in which the institution is the absolute core and is relatively divergent. It has the weakest structural advantage of the three types. The integrated mode forms a network structure with a single institution at the core and other institutions distributed evenly throughout the structure. This mode has the strongest structural advantage among the three types. This study offers the practical application of improving the practice of grassland governance in China and is theoretically significant because it can contribute to improving grassland governance modes and enriching the public goods resources governance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内蒙古三种草地资源治理模式的异质性责任分析
草原资源治理是生态文明建设的重要组成部分,直接影响草原治理绩效。本研究运用委托代理理论,运用社会网络分析,从制度设置和制度网络特征两方面比较中国草原资源治理模式。本研究发现了自设计、对接和整合三种草地资源治理模式。自设计模式形成双中心多成员的网状结构,是三种结构模式中次优的结构模式。这种对接模式形成了一个以制度为绝对核心、相对发散的单一中心的网络结构。其结构优势是三种类型中最弱的。一体化模式形成了一个以单一机构为核心,其他机构均匀分布在整个结构中的网络结构。这种模式在三种模式中具有最强的结构优势。本研究为完善中国草原治理实践提供了实践应用,对于完善草原治理模式、丰富公共物品资源治理具有理论意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
791
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment (CJPRE) is a peer-reviewed international academic journal that publishes original research in the fields of economic, population, resource, and environment studies as they relate to sustainable development. The journal aims to address and evaluate theoretical frameworks, capability building initiatives, strategic goals, ethical values, empirical research, methodologies, and techniques in the field. CJPRE began publication in 1992 and is sponsored by the Chinese Society for Sustainable Development (CSSD), the Research Center for Sustainable Development of Shandong Province, the Administrative Center for China's Agenda 21 (ACCA21), and Shandong Normal University. The Chinese title of the journal was inscribed by the former Chinese leader, Mr. Deng Xiaoping. Initially focused on China's advances in sustainable development, CJPRE now also highlights global developments from both developed and developing countries.
期刊最新文献
Spatial network characteristics and drivers of carbon emission reduction capability in urban agglomerations: A case study of Shandong Province Sustainable reputation of lithium-ion battery supplier and its impact on transaction equilibrium in the electric vehicle supply chain Understanding carbon footprint: An evaluation criterion for achieving sustainable development Digital intelligence and synergy of pollution reduction and carbon reduction: “Dividend” or “gap”? Substitutability of urban sustainability assessment indicators: A semantic similarity analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1