Differentiation in medulloblastomas: immunohistochemical study of twenty-one cases.

Applied pathology Pub Date : 1989-01-01
D Aguilar, T Alvaro, M Camara, F Nogales, F O'Valle, R G Del Moral, M Gomez-Morales, J Aneiros
{"title":"Differentiation in medulloblastomas: immunohistochemical study of twenty-one cases.","authors":"D Aguilar,&nbsp;T Alvaro,&nbsp;M Camara,&nbsp;F Nogales,&nbsp;F O'Valle,&nbsp;R G Del Moral,&nbsp;M Gomez-Morales,&nbsp;J Aneiros","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twenty-one cases of medulloblastoma (MB), 20 corresponding to the classical type and 1 to the desmoplastic variant (DPM), were studied immunohistochemically with glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S-100 protein (S-100P), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and 200-kd neurofilaments (NF) in order to assess their differentiation potential. Their respective positivities in neoplastic cells were: 42% for GFAP, 47% for S-100P, 61% for NSE and absence of NF. Isolated neoplastic cells (e.g., cells lacking processes and with scanty cytoplasm), appeared positive for neuroglial markers (GFAP and S-100P). Most cases, however, showed positive reactive neuroglial cells. NF were never found in neoplastic cells, but in trapped neuronal processes. In most cases, large numbers of cells had high positivity to NSE. Cells of lucent islands of DPM were positive for GFAP and S-100P, while Homer-Wright type rosettes showed positive only for NSE. The above results support a neuroglial differentiation in MB. NSE was considered a nonspecific marker for neuroblastic cells.</p>","PeriodicalId":77670,"journal":{"name":"Applied pathology","volume":"7 5","pages":"277-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twenty-one cases of medulloblastoma (MB), 20 corresponding to the classical type and 1 to the desmoplastic variant (DPM), were studied immunohistochemically with glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S-100 protein (S-100P), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and 200-kd neurofilaments (NF) in order to assess their differentiation potential. Their respective positivities in neoplastic cells were: 42% for GFAP, 47% for S-100P, 61% for NSE and absence of NF. Isolated neoplastic cells (e.g., cells lacking processes and with scanty cytoplasm), appeared positive for neuroglial markers (GFAP and S-100P). Most cases, however, showed positive reactive neuroglial cells. NF were never found in neoplastic cells, but in trapped neuronal processes. In most cases, large numbers of cells had high positivity to NSE. Cells of lucent islands of DPM were positive for GFAP and S-100P, while Homer-Wright type rosettes showed positive only for NSE. The above results support a neuroglial differentiation in MB. NSE was considered a nonspecific marker for neuroblastic cells.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髓母细胞瘤的分化:21例免疫组化研究。
用神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)、S-100蛋白(S-100P)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)和200-kd神经丝(NF)对21例髓母细胞瘤(MB)进行免疫组化研究,以评估其分化潜力。它们在肿瘤细胞中的阳性率分别为:GFAP为42%,S-100P为47%,NSE和NF缺失为61%。分离的肿瘤细胞(如缺乏突起和细胞质稀少的细胞),神经胶质标记物(GFAP和S-100P)呈阳性。然而,大多数病例显示阳性反应性神经胶质细胞。在肿瘤细胞中未发现NF,但在被困的神经元突中发现。在大多数情况下,大量细胞对NSE呈高阳性。DPM的朗光岛细胞GFAP和S-100P阳性,而Homer-Wright型莲座细胞仅NSE阳性。上述结果支持MB的神经胶质分化。NSE被认为是神经母细胞的非特异性标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cervical neoplasia. Soft tissue tumors. Immunocytochemistry of anaplastic carcinoma of thyroid gland. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors and spindle cell sarcomas: an immunohistochemical analysis of multiple markers. Coexpression of cytokeratin and vimentin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1