A review of the use and clinical effectiveness of touch as a nursing intervention

Madeline Gleeson , Fiona Timmins
{"title":"A review of the use and clinical effectiveness of touch as a nursing intervention","authors":"Madeline Gleeson ,&nbsp;Fiona Timmins","doi":"10.1016/j.cein.2004.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of this literature review is to explore the use and effectiveness of touch as a distinct aspect of nurse patient communication. Nurses’ use of touch, the impact of touch and the experiences of touch are explored. Touching is a regarded as a special type of non-verbal communication. It is an intimate action that implies an invasion of the individuals’ personal and private space. The practice of nursing involves a high level of human contact encompassing many activities such as bathing a patient, that require a physical aspect in their operation. Touch has been muted as a valuable channel of non-verbal communication in nursing and students are advised of its potential theoretical benefits to clients. Touch has been linked to the phenomenon of caring [Clifford, C., 1995. Caring: fitting the concept to nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing (4), 37–41; Chang, S.O., 2001. The conceptual structure of physical touch in caring. Journal of Advanced Nursing 33(6), 820–827; Bassett, C., 2002. Nurses’ perceptions of care and caring. International Journal of Nursing Practice 8, 8–15] and is suggested to enhance the nurse patient relationship [Arnold, E., Underman Boggs, K., 1999. Interpersonal Relationships. Professional Communication Skills for Nurses. third ed. W.B. Saunders Company, London]. However, the evidence base for this practice is less convincing. The objective of this review is to explore the evidence base that underpins the use of touch in nursing practice and use this knowledge to inform practice. The main objective of the review is to examine the use and clinical effectiveness of touch as a nursing intervention. Little empirical evidence exists that supports the use of touch as a nursing intervention per se, and ambiguity exists with regard to its perception by both patients and nurses. Widespread adoption of touch as a caring intervention is discouraged in the absence of research evidence and clear guidelines for practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87580,"journal":{"name":"Clinical effectiveness in nursing","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 69-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cein.2004.12.002","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical effectiveness in nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361900405000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

The objective of this literature review is to explore the use and effectiveness of touch as a distinct aspect of nurse patient communication. Nurses’ use of touch, the impact of touch and the experiences of touch are explored. Touching is a regarded as a special type of non-verbal communication. It is an intimate action that implies an invasion of the individuals’ personal and private space. The practice of nursing involves a high level of human contact encompassing many activities such as bathing a patient, that require a physical aspect in their operation. Touch has been muted as a valuable channel of non-verbal communication in nursing and students are advised of its potential theoretical benefits to clients. Touch has been linked to the phenomenon of caring [Clifford, C., 1995. Caring: fitting the concept to nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing (4), 37–41; Chang, S.O., 2001. The conceptual structure of physical touch in caring. Journal of Advanced Nursing 33(6), 820–827; Bassett, C., 2002. Nurses’ perceptions of care and caring. International Journal of Nursing Practice 8, 8–15] and is suggested to enhance the nurse patient relationship [Arnold, E., Underman Boggs, K., 1999. Interpersonal Relationships. Professional Communication Skills for Nurses. third ed. W.B. Saunders Company, London]. However, the evidence base for this practice is less convincing. The objective of this review is to explore the evidence base that underpins the use of touch in nursing practice and use this knowledge to inform practice. The main objective of the review is to examine the use and clinical effectiveness of touch as a nursing intervention. Little empirical evidence exists that supports the use of touch as a nursing intervention per se, and ambiguity exists with regard to its perception by both patients and nurses. Widespread adoption of touch as a caring intervention is discouraged in the absence of research evidence and clear guidelines for practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
触觉作为一种护理干预的使用和临床效果的综述
本文献综述的目的是探讨触摸作为护患沟通的一个独特方面的使用和有效性。探讨了护士对触摸的使用、触摸的影响和触摸的体验。触摸被认为是一种特殊类型的非语言交流。这是一种亲密的行为,意味着对个人和私人空间的侵犯。护理实践涉及高水平的人类接触,包括许多活动,如给病人洗澡,这在他们的手术中需要身体方面。在护理中,触摸作为一种有价值的非语言交流渠道已经被取消,学生们被告知它对客户的潜在理论好处。触摸与关怀的现象有关[Clifford, C., 1995]。关怀:将理念融入护理实践。高级护理杂志(4),37-41;张素素,2001。关怀中身体接触的概念结构。高级护理杂志33(6),820-827;巴塞特,C., 2002。护士对护理和关怀的认知。国际护理实践杂志8,8 - 15]并建议加强护患关系[Arnold, E., Underman Boggs, K., 1999]。人际关系。护士专业沟通技巧。[3] W.B. Saunders公司,伦敦。然而,这种做法的证据基础不那么令人信服。本综述的目的是探索在护理实践中使用触摸的证据基础,并利用这些知识为实践提供信息。回顾的主要目的是检查触摸作为护理干预的使用和临床效果。很少有经验证据支持触摸作为护理干预本身的使用,并且患者和护士对其感知存在歧义。在缺乏研究证据和明确的实践指南的情况下,不鼓励广泛采用触摸作为护理干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maternal psychosocial predictors of pediatric health care use: Use of the common sense model of health and illness behaviors to extend beyond the usual suspects Does excessive alcohol use in teenagers affect their everyday prospective memory? What is it like to use hip protectors? A qualitative study of the views and experiences of nurses and patients Evaluation of the nature of untoward clinical events in adult high dependency care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1