Nonconvex multicommodity near equilibrium models: Energy markets perspective

IF 3.7 4区 管理学 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Operations Research Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orp.2022.100243
J. David Fuller, Mehrdad Pirnia
{"title":"Nonconvex multicommodity near equilibrium models: Energy markets perspective","authors":"J. David Fuller,&nbsp;Mehrdad Pirnia","doi":"10.1016/j.orp.2022.100243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper we explore the application of the minimum total opportunity cost (MTOC) model of Fuller and Celebi (2017) to multicommodity market planning models containing binary variables and price sensitive demands, with or without substitution among commodities. We present a greatly simplified derivation of the MTOC approximation of Fuller and Celebi (2017), here called the near equilibrium (NE) model, a mixed integer program with nonlinearities only in the objective function. For some models, the NE solution achieves the MTOC solution exactly, as in an example. We provide a simple example of capacity expansion in gas and electricity markets that are linked through substitution in demand and in the possibility of using gas to produce electricity. In several cases, we compare the NE solution to the social welfare (SW) maximization solution calculated by a sequential optimization algorithm. In one case, the sequential optimization algorithm fails to converge, due to the binary variables. For the other cases, the NE model has smaller producer opportunity costs – in particular, in most cases, smaller make whole payments that bring negative producer profits up to zero – at some sacrifice of social welfare. We suggest that the NE model could be useful to government regulators as a supplementary tool along with SW models, as the NE solution usually reduces subsidies needed for make whole payments, and sometimes benefits consumers compared to the SW solution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38055,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716022000161/pdfft?md5=330a37ae91646562d610ce344a2e5848&pid=1-s2.0-S2214716022000161-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716022000161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we explore the application of the minimum total opportunity cost (MTOC) model of Fuller and Celebi (2017) to multicommodity market planning models containing binary variables and price sensitive demands, with or without substitution among commodities. We present a greatly simplified derivation of the MTOC approximation of Fuller and Celebi (2017), here called the near equilibrium (NE) model, a mixed integer program with nonlinearities only in the objective function. For some models, the NE solution achieves the MTOC solution exactly, as in an example. We provide a simple example of capacity expansion in gas and electricity markets that are linked through substitution in demand and in the possibility of using gas to produce electricity. In several cases, we compare the NE solution to the social welfare (SW) maximization solution calculated by a sequential optimization algorithm. In one case, the sequential optimization algorithm fails to converge, due to the binary variables. For the other cases, the NE model has smaller producer opportunity costs – in particular, in most cases, smaller make whole payments that bring negative producer profits up to zero – at some sacrifice of social welfare. We suggest that the NE model could be useful to government regulators as a supplementary tool along with SW models, as the NE solution usually reduces subsidies needed for make whole payments, and sometimes benefits consumers compared to the SW solution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非凸多商品近均衡模型:能源市场视角
在本文中,我们探讨了Fuller和Celebi(2017)的最小总机会成本(MTOC)模型在包含二元变量和价格敏感需求的多商品市场规划模型中的应用,包括商品之间是否存在替代。我们提出了Fuller和Celebi(2017)的MTOC近似的极大简化推导,这里称为近平衡(NE)模型,这是一个仅在目标函数中具有非线性的混合整数程序。对于某些模型,网元解决方案完全实现了MTOC解决方案,如示例所示。我们提供了一个简单的例子,说明天然气和电力市场的产能扩张是通过需求替代和使用天然气发电的可能性联系在一起的。在一些情况下,我们将NE解决方案与通过顺序优化算法计算的社会福利(SW)最大化解决方案进行了比较。在一种情况下,由于二元变量,顺序优化算法不能收敛。在其他情况下,以牺牲一些社会福利为代价,东北模式的生产者机会成本更小——特别是,在大多数情况下,更少的生产者支付全部费用,使生产者的负利润接近于零。我们建议,作为SW模型的补充工具,NE模型可能对政府监管机构有用,因为NE解决方案通常会减少支付所需的补贴,与SW解决方案相比,有时会使消费者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research Perspectives
Operations Research Perspectives Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
27 days
期刊最新文献
Research on Green Supply Chain Finance Risk Identification based on Two-Stage Deep Learning Editorial Board ESG integration in portfolio selection: A robust preference-based multicriteria approach Ranking-based second stage in data envelopment analysis: An application to research efficiency in higher education Automated machine learning methodology for optimizing production processes in small and medium-sized enterprises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1