Provider perspective on use of episiotomy in obstetric practice

Shalini Singh , Tushita Thakur , Nomita Chandhiok , B.S. Dhillon
{"title":"Provider perspective on use of episiotomy in obstetric practice","authors":"Shalini Singh ,&nbsp;Tushita Thakur ,&nbsp;Nomita Chandhiok ,&nbsp;B.S. Dhillon","doi":"10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>A survey of private and public sector maternity care providers was carried out to understand their perspective on use of current guidelines advocating selective use of episiotomy. Nearly 90% of the providers were aware of guidelines on selective episiotomy use but significantly higher proportion (</span><em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03) of private practitioners (56.6%) advocated its use in all nullipara as compared to public sector doctors (23.3%). In actual practice, however, nearly 80% providers reported performing episiotomy in more than 75% nullipara with no difference between private and public sector doctors. Thus, awareness of current evidence was not reflected in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":91915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.02.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214420X1600019X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A survey of private and public sector maternity care providers was carried out to understand their perspective on use of current guidelines advocating selective use of episiotomy. Nearly 90% of the providers were aware of guidelines on selective episiotomy use but significantly higher proportion (p = 0.03) of private practitioners (56.6%) advocated its use in all nullipara as compared to public sector doctors (23.3%). In actual practice, however, nearly 80% providers reported performing episiotomy in more than 75% nullipara with no difference between private and public sector doctors. Thus, awareness of current evidence was not reflected in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
会阴切开术在产科实践中的应用
对私营和公共部门的产科护理提供者进行了调查,以了解他们对使用当前倡导选择性使用会阴切开术的指南的看法。近90%的医护人员了解选择性会阴切开术的使用指南,但主张在所有无产者中使用会阴切开术的私人医生比例(56.6%)明显高于公立医生(23.3%)(p = 0.03)。然而,在实际实践中,近80%的医疗服务提供者报告说,在超过75%的产妇中进行了会阴切开术,私营和公立部门的医生之间没有区别。因此,对现有证据的认识并没有反映在临床实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fate of the germ cells in mammalian ovary: A review Endocrine disruption and female reproductive health: Implications on cross-talk between endocrine and autocrine/paracrine axes in the ovary Cyclic nucleotides regulate oocyte meiotic maturation and quality in mammals Gene profiling the window of implantation: Microarray analyses from human and rodent models Does elevated serum progesterone on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration decrease live birth rates?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1