Which message? Which channel? Which customer? Exploring response rates in multi-channel marketing using short-form advertising

Omar Marzouk , Joni Salminen , Pengyi Zhang , Bernard J. Jansen
{"title":"Which message? Which channel? Which customer? Exploring response rates in multi-channel marketing using short-form advertising","authors":"Omar Marzouk ,&nbsp;Joni Salminen ,&nbsp;Pengyi Zhang ,&nbsp;Bernard J. Jansen","doi":"10.1016/j.dim.2022.100008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Formulating short form advertising messages with little ad content that work and choosing high-performing channels to disseminate them are persistent challenges in multichannel marketing. Drawing on the persuasive systems design model, we conducted an experiment with 33,848 actual customers of an international telecom company. In a real-life setting, we compared the effectiveness of three persuasion strategies (rational, emotional, and social) tested in three marketing channels (short message service, social media advertising, and mobile application), evaluating their effect on influencing customers to purchase international mobile phone credits. Results suggest that companies should send rational messages when using short form advertising messages regardless of the channel to achieve higher response rates. Findings further show that certain customer characteristics are predictive of positive responses and differ by channel but not by message type. Findings from crowdsourced evaluations also indicate that people noticeably disagree on what persuasive strategy was applied to these short messages, which might indicate that consumers are not well-equipped to identify persuasive strategies or that what advertisers see as a ‘pure’ strategy actually involves elements from multiple strategies as interpreted by consumers. The results have implications for the theoretical understanding of persuasive short form commercial messaging in multichannel marketing and practical insights for advertising within limited amount of space and attention afforded by many digital channels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72769,"journal":{"name":"Data and information management","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100008"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925122001061/pdfft?md5=0f74602a782d71e732f7a418e12c68ea&pid=1-s2.0-S2543925122001061-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data and information management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925122001061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Formulating short form advertising messages with little ad content that work and choosing high-performing channels to disseminate them are persistent challenges in multichannel marketing. Drawing on the persuasive systems design model, we conducted an experiment with 33,848 actual customers of an international telecom company. In a real-life setting, we compared the effectiveness of three persuasion strategies (rational, emotional, and social) tested in three marketing channels (short message service, social media advertising, and mobile application), evaluating their effect on influencing customers to purchase international mobile phone credits. Results suggest that companies should send rational messages when using short form advertising messages regardless of the channel to achieve higher response rates. Findings further show that certain customer characteristics are predictive of positive responses and differ by channel but not by message type. Findings from crowdsourced evaluations also indicate that people noticeably disagree on what persuasive strategy was applied to these short messages, which might indicate that consumers are not well-equipped to identify persuasive strategies or that what advertisers see as a ‘pure’ strategy actually involves elements from multiple strategies as interpreted by consumers. The results have implications for the theoretical understanding of persuasive short form commercial messaging in multichannel marketing and practical insights for advertising within limited amount of space and attention afforded by many digital channels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪个消息?哪个频道?哪个客户?探索利用短广告进行多渠道营销的响应率
在多渠道营销中,用很少的广告内容来制定简短的广告信息,并选择高效的渠道来传播这些信息,是长期存在的挑战。利用说服系统设计模型,我们对一家国际电信公司的33,848名实际客户进行了实验。在现实生活中,我们比较了在三种营销渠道(短信服务、社交媒体广告和移动应用)中测试的三种说服策略(理性、情感和社交)的有效性,评估了它们对影响客户购买国际手机积分的效果。结果表明,公司在使用简短的广告信息时,无论通过何种渠道,都应该发送合理的信息,以获得更高的回复率。研究结果进一步表明,某些客户特征可以预测积极的回应,并因渠道而异,而不是因信息类型而异。众包评估的结果还表明,人们对这些短信应用了什么有说服力的策略存在明显的分歧,这可能表明消费者并没有很好地识别有说服力的策略,或者广告商所看到的“纯粹”策略实际上包含了消费者所理解的多种策略的元素。研究结果对多渠道营销中有说服力的短形式商业信息的理论理解以及在有限的空间和注意力范围内由许多数字渠道提供的广告的实践见解具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Data and information management
Data and information management Management Information Systems, Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
Erratum regarding missing Declaration of Competing Interest statements in previously published articles (Volume 6, Issues 1–4) Improved detection of transient events in wide area sky survey using convolutional neural networks An evaluation method of academic output that considers productivity differences Adaptive K-means clustering based under-sampling methods to solve the class imbalance problem Does internet use affect public risk perception? — From the perspective of political participation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1